Forum sponsored by:
MEW, would less be more?
| JouniP | 06/11/2011 11:04:36 |
| 18 forum posts 5 photos | First, I like to say that David Clark has made great job as a editor of Model Engineer's Workshop magazine. However, there is one thing I personally don't like and I like to start discussion about that. When I startated my subscription a few years ago there were eight issues each year and weeks between two numbers were long. Later, number of issues were increased to ten and then twelve and thirteen, if I remember correctly. In my opinion thirteen number per year is too much. I have another activities than just read MEW, I have to find to be in workshop also. Sometimes I have two or three issues I have not read yet. I know thats partly becouse english is not my mother language, and I am a little bit slow reader. But I also feel that nowadays magazine is not as interesting as it used to be. Sometimes I find myself thinking that are some articles just to fill those several pages? Some articles seems to be quite empty, I would say. I know that reason for thirteen issues is schelude of ME and MEW is easier to maintain. Week 1: ME Week 2: MEW Week 3: ME Week:4: to be rest then start again from week 1 But should there allways be a week 2? What if two or three times per year week 2 does not exist at all? If there would be just 10 to 11 MEW issues each year, would they be thicker and better. Would Mr Clark find time and force make those numbers even better than they are now? Would Mr Clark find time to do something just for himself and his family? Would we all be more satisfied to MEW magazine? Yours Jouni |
| John Coates | 06/11/2011 11:51:44 |
 558 forum posts 28 photos | As someone who only gets MEW I wouldn't want any less issues. I can see what you mean when you include ME into the equation but I think you just need to lobby for fewer ME's or read quicker
 |
| John Stevenson | 06/11/2011 12:28:29 |
 5068 forum posts 3 photos | For Christs sake don't upset everything, we have only just got over decimalisation and having to put the clocks forward............. John S. |
| keithmart | 06/11/2011 13:32:55 |
 165 forum posts | Hi
I would rather see more magazine and less adverts.
Yes I know they are supposed to cut the cost of publication, but do they just contribute to the profit???
keith
Leeds UK |
| Peter G. Shaw | 06/11/2011 15:18:01 |
 1531 forum posts 44 photos | To an extent I agree with Jouni in that it does take some time to read and consider the contents, followed by adding relevant entries into my home-made database of articles of possible future interest. And yes, I often have the last two, or even three issues on my desk awaiting entry into my database. And I do not take Model Engineer! When the idea of moving to 13 issues was being considered, the editor asked what we, the readers, thought. The eventual result of the survey, if it can be called that, was that one person, me as it happens, was against it for various reasons, and so the change went ahead. It also transpired that the reason for 13 issues was so that it would fit in with the ME schedule. Here are the comments I made then: 1. It takes time to read and digest. 2. The extra issue will involve extra payments to writers. 3. Would advertisers be willing to pay for the extra issue? 4. Direct debit payments are taken quarterly. This means that one of the quarters has an extra magazine, hence the average cost per issue is lower in that particular quarter. 5. Individual purchasers from, eg WHSmiths, have to remember that in one month there will be two issues. 6. There is increased storage requirements. I think it is possibly too late now to have a change, but if a change was to be forthcoming, I would be happy to see it reduced to 12 issues per annum, similar to other (non-engineering) magazines. At least then I wouldn't be taken by surprise when the latest issue is designated Autumn 2011 rather than October 2011 - ok, ok, I know there has already been an October issue, but I am sure you know what I mean. Would it result in more articles per issue and less advertising? Somehow I doubt it. Would it result in a lower subscription cost? Again I doubt it, but it might just defer that inevitable day when the cost does indeed increase. Regards, Peter G. Shaw |
| mgnbuk | 06/11/2011 16:03:19 |
| 1394 forum posts 103 photos | I agree. The current 13 issue arrangement provides no more "content" than the old 8 issue arrangement, but includes far more advertisements - most of which are of no interest & of little relevance to me. I have not not happy with the current content/advert ratio for some time now and, as I see no chance of any change for my idea of better, I cancelled my DD subscription a couple of issues ago. I guess you can't please all of the people all of the time though, as I have subscribed since very early on (and have all bar a couple of early issues), it is a shame non the less. I stopped getting ME many years ago, as I have no interest in steam models or railways - maybe time to have another look at HSM ? £0.02 Nigel B. |
| Billy Mills | 06/11/2011 17:23:48 |
| 377 forum posts | I agree with Sir John, stick with 13 per year if DC1 can keep it up. I cannot understand how you can get a new issue and not read it the same day. How do you explain that the adverts help pay for the printing costs, without the ads the cover price rise would make MEW unaffordable for many retired people [which is possibly the majority of readers].
Very much hope that DC1 is better now.
Billy.
|
| Steve Garnett | 06/11/2011 19:08:20 |
| 837 forum posts 27 photos | If this wasn't an economical/sensible way to run the editing of multiple mags, then I'm sure that the management wouldn't do it this way. It wouldn't worry me whether it was 12 or 13, but I don't think that going back to 8 or whatever would be very helpful. If it were to go down that route, then probably 4 a year (quarterly) would be the way to go, but it would inevitably get more expensive... As it is, it's not ludicrously expensive, but I think that it probably would be if the advert to content ratio went up in favour of content, which is what would inevitably happen in the quarterly scenario. And nobody is obliged to read all of the adverts, are they? I certainly don't. (Oops, perhaps I shouldn't admit that just in case any of the advertisers are reading this!) |
| NJH | 06/11/2011 19:15:14 |
 2314 forum posts 139 photos | Well Guys Wish for what you like but I suspect the number of issues per year of the magazines is purely a commercial judgement by the magazine owners. If they could sell a copy of each every week and make a greater profit (after allowing for the extra costs) or if they could only make a profit by printing ME one month and MEW the next they would do so. And why not - they are surely in business to make money. Advertising is necessary - the price of the publications would be prohibitive without it . Regards Norman |
| Lawrie Alush-Jaggs | 07/11/2011 10:08:42 |
 118 forum posts 32 photos | Personally I rather like thirteen issues. It doesn't take long to digest, two hours to read from cover to cover. I would not go so far as to want more issues a year but I would prefer not to go back to eight.
Lawrie |
| Eddie | 07/11/2011 12:31:18 |
 56 forum posts | I agree with Lawrie. Got my issue on friday and will finish it by tonight. Read through it a couple of times and made the mental notes about the content.
Eddie |
| martin perman | 01/12/2011 09:39:34 |
 2095 forum posts 75 photos | Gentlemen,
I enjoy MEW and dont find a problem with the number each year and I find all of the articles interesting even though I may not use them.
As to reading the magazine it does not take me very long at all particularly as I also have Practical Classics, stationary Engine and Steam Railway to read each month as I have interests in these and run a classic car and collect Stationary engines.
Martin P |
| colin hawes | 01/12/2011 10:25:55 |
| 570 forum posts 18 photos | Never be negative about things. I am happy to read more than one mag. a day ,it,s just a case of prioritising things.Read the bits of immediate interest for motivation ,get out to the workshop if you can afford to heat it, but read the mags. when you have just scrapped the latest part or lost that tiny bit that you have just parted off.Above all, try to get something done each day. The longest journey and little steps!
Colin |
| steamdave | 01/12/2011 10:48:20 |
| 526 forum posts 45 photos | Talking of advertising. Remember the days in ME when the adverts were all grouped at the front and back of the magazine and you could read the contents Without distraction? Dave The Emerald Isle |
| David Clark 1 | 01/12/2011 10:55:41 |
 3357 forum posts 112 photos 10 articles | Hi Dave
The adverts still are at the front and back of ME.
Does this mean that you don't buy it anymore?
regards David |
| John Coates | 01/12/2011 12:25:25 |
558 forum posts 28 photos | Having been collecting back issues of MEW for the past six months it strikes me that we got more content back in the 90's when it started. I think this is because a lot of the content was about making things which we now find it easier/more convenient to buy. Many an article started off with "I then looked into the price of one of these things and decided it was too high for me so I made one and here's how to do the same yourself"
They are a rich mine of material and ideas which I now thoroughly enjoy perusing at my leisure. Particularly so since I have an old lathe (1947) and mill/drill (90's) which do not possess DRO's or anything CNC.
It is surprising how well equipped the workshops of some contributors to MEW and on here are, way beyond what the writers of those early MEW's could ever hope for. In the absence of finance they made do and mended.
Looking over recent issues I feel that there is less and less for me so when the renewal comes round in Feb next year I might not take it up. I'm not interested in new technology (beyond DRO's which I have plenty of articles in the back issues about how to fit) and CNC leaves me cold.
Anyway just some lunchtime musings so don't flame me too hard!
PS. I am only missing MEW's 2,3 and 16 if anyone can help me out
John |
| martin perman | 01/12/2011 12:43:11 |
2095 forum posts 75 photos | I have only been getting MEW for the last couple of years as I find it useful to help me with ideas i.e. how people go about setting up or overcoming a problem. I would love in the future to obtain back no's to read.
I must say I do enjoy " making do and mending " also as its an acheivement to get something back up and running again and it does save money as well
 ) hence running a classic car and restoring old stationary engines.Martin P
|
| Billy Mills | 02/12/2011 11:42:43 |
| 377 forum posts | Martin, If you subscribe to MEW then you do have access to all of the MEW's ever published. Scroll to the green tab bar at the top of this page, click on "EXTRA" then go down until you see "go to digital archive" then click on that.
Billy.
|
| martin perman | 02/12/2011 13:21:05 |
2095 forum posts 75 photos | Billy,
Thanks for that, I do subscribe, I'm accused by my wife of spending to much time on my computers, what with writing articles for another magazine and editing a club newsletter, she will have a fit when I show her MEW from No 1 to read
An excellent Data Base.
Martin P |
| Robert Dodds | 02/12/2011 18:20:14 |
| 324 forum posts 63 photos | David Clark 1 I realize you have been under the weather recently and sincerely hope you will be back to normal duties soon.but don't be too hard on Dave from the Emerald Isle. Whilst your eye was off MEW 184 14 whole pages of adverts snucked into the middle of my mag so he does have a point Bob D |
Please login to post a reply.
Magazine Locator
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our Newsletter
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
Latest Forum Posts
- hemingway ball turner
04/07/2025 14:40:26 - *Oct 2023: FORUM MIGRATION TIMELINE*
05/10/2023 07:57:11 - Making ER11 collet chuck
05/10/2023 07:56:24 - What did you do today? 2023
05/10/2023 07:25:01 - Orrery
05/10/2023 06:00:41 - Wera hand-tools
05/10/2023 05:47:07 - New member
05/10/2023 04:40:11 - Problems with external pot on at1 vfd
05/10/2023 00:06:32 - Drain plug
04/10/2023 23:36:17 - digi phase converter for 10 machines.....
04/10/2023 23:13:48 - More Latest Posts...
- View All Topics
Support Our Partners
Shopping Partners
Subscription Offer
Latest "For Sale" Ads
- Reeves** - Rebuilt Royal Scot by Martin Evans
by John Broughton
£300.00 - BRITANNIA 5" GAUGE James Perrier
by Jon Seabright 1
£2,500.00 - Drill Grinder - for restoration
by Nigel Graham 2
£0.00 - WARCO WM18 MILLING MACHINE
by Alex Chudley
£1,200.00 - MYFORD SUPER 7 LATHE
by Alex Chudley
£2,000.00 - More "For Sale" Ads...
Latest "Wanted" Ads
- D1-3 backplate
by Michael Horley
Price Not Specified - fixed steady for a Colchester bantam mark1 800
by George Jervis
Price Not Specified - lbsc pansy
by JACK SIDEBOTHAM
Price Not Specified - Pratt Burnerd multifit chuck key.
by Tim Riome
Price Not Specified - BANDSAW BLADE WELDER
by HUGH
Price Not Specified - More "Wanted" Ads...
Get In Touch!
Do you want to contact the Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop team?
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.
Digital Back Issues
Donate
Register
Log-in
Model Engineer Magazine
- Percival Marshall
- M.E. History
- LittleLEC
- M.E. Clock
ME Workshop
- An Adcock
- & Shipley
- Horizontal
- Mill
Subscribe Now
- Great savings
- Delivered to your door
Pre-order your copy!
- Delivered to your doorstep!
- Free UK delivery!
All Forum Topics > Model Engineers' Workshop. > MEW, would less be more?