Ady1 | 30/12/2015 01:33:47 |
![]() 6137 forum posts 893 photos | A toolmaker who built his own flood defences, including pumps and a flood gate, has demonstrated how they are protecting his house.
|
J Hancock | 30/12/2015 08:18:20 |
869 forum posts | An admirable effort but I much prefer Stalin's method of dealing with the failure of State officials to do their job properly !
|
Douglas Johnston | 30/12/2015 09:39:16 |
![]() 814 forum posts 36 photos | There seems to be a lot of criticism about flood defences, some of it probably justified, but when nature throws millions of tons of water at us in a very short space of time even the best flood defences can be overwhelmed. No government can prevent floods, all they can do is minimise the problem. My heart goes out to those who have been flooded, it must be dreadful, but I'm afraid it is something we have to live with. Doug |
David Clark 1 | 30/12/2015 09:54:57 |
![]() 3357 forum posts 112 photos 10 articles | I don't see how the government can justify spending millions on flood prevention until the house has been flooded at least once to prove they are lin danger.
|
Tony Pratt 1 | 30/12/2015 10:21:06 |
2319 forum posts 13 photos | Most if not all the flooded homes/premise have been flooded before & yes it must be dreadful. What I can't understand is given the much heralded flood warnings some people didn't bother to get their prized possessions upstairs? Tony
|
speelwerk | 30/12/2015 10:27:52 |
464 forum posts 2 photos | Posted by David Clark 1 on 30/12/2015 09:54:57:
I don't see how the government can justify spending millions on flood prevention until the house has been flooded at least once to prove they are lin danger.
When the whole of the Netherlands is flooded the area where I live will be an island, still I have to pay taxes for flood defences. Niko. |
JA | 30/12/2015 11:01:05 |
![]() 1605 forum posts 83 photos | Posted by David Clark 1 on 30/12/2015 09:54:57:
I don't see how the government can justify spending millions on flood prevention until the house has been flooded at least once to prove they are lin danger.
Most homes never get flooded. I guess that most homes on flood planes never flood. I have lived on a flood plane for over twenty years and even in the worst rain the local river, 40 yards away, has remained within its banks. Even if it overtopped it would have to rise a further five feet to reach me. Even so some insurers will not give me house insurance. JA
|
Neil Wyatt | 30/12/2015 11:09:18 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | The stupidity is allowing new developments and other actions that make the problem worse. Near our house a large industrial park is going into the Trent floodplain and six miles away my mother-in-laws village has an going planning battle about a new housing development proposed for right next to the river. Insurers have already said they won't cover the homes if they are built. If there was more woodland and heathland in the Lake District and other upland areas, along with restoration of the natural floodplain woodland along the length of the rivers, it would have held the flood peaks back, reducing the height and extent of the damage at the expense of slightly lengthening the duration of the flooding. The cost of doing this is miniscule compared to increasing hard defences, By rewarding farmers for the reduction in harm resulting from increased capacity of their land, rather than compensating them for profits forgone the changes in land use become a positive for all of society (and widllife) rather than an unwelcome imposition. These ideas aren't new - I remember discussing issues around this with both Chris Baines and George Peterken about 25 years ago... Neil |
Ady1 | 30/12/2015 11:19:10 |
![]() 6137 forum posts 893 photos | An admirable effort but I much prefer Stalin's method of dealing with the failure of State officials to do their job properly ! Hadrians wall is 73 miles long, took about 6 years, was the largest structure in the Northern Roman Empire, and was built by hand Edinburghs Trams are 9 miles long, took 7 years, are 2/3 complete, and are 100% overbudget so far, plus they used power machinery to do most of the work The removal of public crucifixion for failure definitely hampered progress on the Edinburgh job |
the artfull-codger | 30/12/2015 11:36:20 |
![]() 304 forum posts 28 photos | Couldn't have put it better Neil, & to add to that, we used to get our local river[the tees] dredged when I was a lad but never seen a dredger for years, a lot of the new houses get their "gardens" concreted because they don't like gardening thus adding to the surplus water. Graham [with a large veg ,fruit & orchard garden] & workshop of course!! |
Muzzer | 30/12/2015 12:19:52 |
![]() 2904 forum posts 448 photos | Politicians are like schoolchildren who have been caught stealing. Rather than own up they try to distract attention and simply lie. Facts are rather thin on the ground of course. Funny thing is that we can't bring ourselves to claim disaster relief from the EU for fear of hypocrisy. |
Roger Williams 2 | 30/12/2015 13:12:42 |
368 forum posts 7 photos | Douglas, + 1. Climate has been changing for millions of years, nothing we can do about it but put up up with it. Much of North Africa was green 1000 odd years ago, trees , vegitation, rivers and lakes etc,then the wind changed, and everything dried up. Then the morons in government say we must do something about climate change, like what ?. |
David Clark 1 | 30/12/2015 13:15:19 |
![]() 3357 forum posts 112 photos 10 articles | What happens if the flood relief problem is at the lower end of the river? Wil this just move the problem upstream rather than curing it? Might be cheaper to build new houses off the flood plain and give one free to each affected house! |
Colin Johnson 3 | 30/12/2015 13:19:32 |
1 forum posts | Yes extreme weather is a major cause. However the European Water Framework Directive has prevented us almost completely from dredging our rivers. For several hundred years our rivers have been dredged by the local communities. EWFD now requires us to allow our river to follow their own natural way. In particular to allow them to flood the flood plains. This has been the case since 2002. Government will not mention this as it is a major reason to get out of the mad house that Europe has become. |
duncan webster | 30/12/2015 13:40:13 |
5307 forum posts 83 photos | If we must build on flood plains why not put houses on stilts? Park the car underneath, and then when you get a flood warning just drive to hight ground. Government is in a no win situation. They have been roundly criticised for building flood defences in my home town where it has never flooded in 100 years. Trouble is last week it did, and they haven't finished the work yet. |
John Stevenson | 30/12/2015 14:19:14 |
![]() 5068 forum posts 3 photos | We have a problem in this country with land fill, or lack of it. We have a problem with flooding, especially the Severn, but when you see it flooded it's all in farmland.
Why can't they tip non-bio land fill like rubble along side the banks of a river. It's a win-win situation, the developers ? have to pay handsomely to tip rubble, the farmer gets paid and someone else builds the flood defences for the area |
the artfull-codger | 30/12/2015 15:14:41 |
![]() 304 forum posts 28 photos | Well put Muzzer, the first sign of disaster in another country & this country's sending millions of aid over,do anyone ever send our unfortunate victims anything I wonder??? just a thought. |
JA | 30/12/2015 15:24:53 |
![]() 1605 forum posts 83 photos | Posted by John Stevenson on 30/12/2015 14:19:14:
Why can't they tip non-bio land fill like rubble along side the banks of a river. It's a win-win situation, the developers ? have to pay handsomely to tip rubble, the farmer gets paid and someone else builds the flood defences for the area Clean land fill is a very valuable "product" for filling holes. Locally we have a number of quarries that have gone through the water table. Therefore, fortunately, they cannot be filled with ordinary land fill, only inert land fill. One quarry, about ten miles away, is slowly being filled with the chalk from the Cannel Tunnel. So far it has taken 15 years. I don't disagree with you, though. JA |
Nick_G | 30/12/2015 16:42:03 |
![]() 1808 forum posts 744 photos | Posted by Douglas Johnston on 30/12/2015 09:39:16:
but when nature throws millions of tons of water at us in a very short space of time even the best flood defences can be overwhelmed.
Doug
This. I am also thinking that perhaps that El Nino guy may be something to do with it all even in the northern hemisphere. Nick |
JohnF | 30/12/2015 18:12:33 |
![]() 1243 forum posts 202 photos | Part of the problem is we can't run our own country, see the link below. We live in an artificial landscape shaped and run by man and you can't take man out of the equation which is what some polititions and academics seem to want. We have interfered in nature for millennia and the fact is we cannot stop, local people have run and shaped the land for generations and understand how it works best. Dredging and clearing watercourses may well not have solved the problems entirely in this case but would certainly have helped if the EU had not interfered! That said the level of flooding here in the north has been unprecedented and beyond anything any of us have seen, our local river exceeded the record level by over 5ft that's a serious amount of water and we have tides that are higher than most which if they happen to coincide with the peak river level it compounds the problem. Locally this is what happened and the water level rose extremely quickly. Aha! Just seen that Colin J3 has beaten me to the EU rules 🤔 Edited By JohnF on 30/12/2015 18:17:19 |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.