By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
Forum sponsored by:
Forum sponsored by Forum House Ad Zone

Screwcutting Crashes -

All Topics | Latest Posts

Search for:  in Thread Title in  
SillyOldDuffer10/05/2017 20:43:23
10668 forum posts
2415 photos

I'm back at the bottom of the class again.

Whilst screw-cutting on my metric WM280 I crashed the saddle into the headstock. (Actually the end of the spring guard over the leadscrew,) Again!

I've set the top-slide at 60° (to give a 30° approach with the top-slide) as shown in the picture. With a 4-way toolpost you can see this means that it's very difficult to get the tool close to the chuck without hitting something.

dsc04393.jpg

What I don't like:

  • The rod being threaded has to be further out from the chuck than normal
  • The end of the top-slide is close to outside of the chuck jaws
  • The square top of the tool-post is close to a the inside of the jaws
  • The saddle is very close to the lathe stop, or, if this is removed, to the end of the telescopic lead-screw protector. Which is the same size and the lather-stop
  • The 4 way tool-post is clamped down with the indexing lock inoperative.
  • It's only a matter of time before something breaks!

I find threads cut with the top-slide at an angle are much less likely to tear than when I wind the tool in at a right-angle with the cross-slide. But the downside is that I crash if I'm slightly late disengaging the half-nut.

This isn't ideal! Am I doing something wrong?

Dave

PS. Sorry about the sideways photo. I can't work out how to rotate pictures once they're on the forum.

Roger Williams 210/05/2017 21:00:59
368 forum posts
7 photos

Dave, have a look on utube for Joe Pieczynski, hes done a video about screwcutting the other way round, ie, from headstock outwards . Saves crashing ! I think its called, " Threading, best teqnique ever "

Edited By Roger Williams 2 on 10/05/2017 21:04:54

Gray6210/05/2017 21:08:16
1058 forum posts
16 photos

I've rotated the pic so it's a bit easier to see what is going on. I don't have any suggestions to help other than to say that on my WM250V and on my bigger GH1330 gear head lathe, I removed the leadscrew covers as I found that because of the way they are mounted, they prevent working close to the headstock, particularly when working on thin pieces mounted on the faceplate. ( in fact on both lathes it was impossible to skim the faceplates without having a ridiculous tool overhang.)

screwcuttingpic.jpg

Russell Eberhardt10/05/2017 21:22:46
avatar
2785 forum posts
87 photos

A quick change toolpost would move the tool further left or you could make an extension piece to fit your existing four way toolpost.

Russell.

Andrew Johnston10/05/2017 21:29:23
avatar
7061 forum posts
719 photos

I always screwcut with the topslide parallel to the lathe axis and locked, so clearance isn't a problem. I've not generally had a problem with tearing, but find that a spring pass or two can get rid of any roughness. Mind you I tend to use inserts for standard threads. It might be worth looking at an insert and trying to grind a HSS tool copy.

Andrew

Tony Pratt 110/05/2017 22:10:22
2319 forum posts
13 photos

Do a 'dry run' without the spindle moving to check for possible collisions, slow your rpm to allow more time to react.

Tony

SillyOldDuffer10/05/2017 22:13:37
10668 forum posts
2415 photos

Many thanks for the replies and to Graeme for rotating the photo. (Makes a big difference!)

I've just watched a couple of Joe Pieczynski videos - very interesting. He made cutting threads out from the headstock in reverse look dead easy so I shall give that a try tomorrow. I'm almost convinced I need a quick-change tool-post as well, gosh they're handy. Shame about spending money - I have deep pockets and short arms. I shall see if extending the tool-post can be done out of my junk box.

Despite being very mean careful with money I think I ought to try carbide for threading. I get on well with inserts and, at the right speed, find they produce a good finish. That might fix the tearing problem.

Ta,

Dave

Clive Foster10/05/2017 22:38:32
3630 forum posts
128 photos

There are a number of less costly ways than a QC tool post of getting round this problem. Here are three examples:-

1) Revise the tool grind so that the tool post can be set square to the top slide. Essentially you move the tool shape round by 30° instead of the tool post. Disadvantage is that the tool post is no longer parallel to the lathe axis so the overhanging corner could come into contact with the job on longer threads.

2) Make an offset carrier for the threading tool. Basically a slotted block with a bar on the back to clamp in the tool post slot. Similar to the common carrier for insert parting tool blades.

3) Make a larger tool post with its base reaching out to the corner. This is the way I'd go having used a bunch of 4 way posts as a poor boys QC substitute in SouthBend driving days. Built up construction from two plates and a centre block glued'n screwed together is quite satisfactory so relatively simple to do using stock materials. Ideally you need something faster than the usual nut holding everything down. Especially if you find, as I did, that a fully loaded four way tends to have unacceptable vampire, or even carnivorous, inclinations so a two slot block is much safer.

There are several other perfectly acceptable methods but those are enough for a forum post. I started to do an article for Neil on various less costly and easily made methods of adding most of the virtues of a QC system to a basic top slide. Nearly all the concepts covered would have solved your problem. Unfortunately it got a bit out of hand. Maybe I'll finish it and do as serious edit this winter!

Clive

JA10/05/2017 23:03:08
avatar
1605 forum posts
83 photos

Dave

The only reason for going to the bottom of the class is that you failed to check the clearance between the chuck and everything else through the whole machining operation before starting the lathe.

I do not know the lathe you are using but you need more space. As far as I can see from the photograph there are two ways of doing this:

  1. Increase the overhang of the tool. One is advised to keep the overhang small but the cuts during thread cutting are light and any roughness can be removed by using a die as a thread chaser.
  2. Move the work further away from the chuck. This will probably necessitate the use of a centre in the tailstock which may give you a few difficulties.

I have frequently cut threads, externally and internally, and always quite a bit of thought is required in setting up the job. As you have done I have always angle the top slide.

I feel that the successful cutting of an external thread is the second right of passage with a lathe (the first being setting up a round bar in an independent four jaw chuck).

You won't be bottom of the class for long.

JA

Thor 🇳🇴11/05/2017 05:45:48
avatar
1766 forum posts
46 photos

Hi Dave,

Sorry to hear about your crash. I have a 290 lathe with a 3-phase motor and inverter. I made some special toolholders for my simple QCTPwith a narrow slot so the HSS toolbit just fit. I can also turn down the speed as I am approaching the end of the thread, if I am very close to the chuck I stop the lathe and turn the chuck by hand for the last turn or so, at least for small diameter work.

Thor

not done it yet11/05/2017 06:13:19
7517 forum posts
20 photos

Yet another couple of possible alternatives.

Use a smaller chuck or thread with a die.

Speedy Builder511/05/2017 06:57:20
2878 forum posts
248 photos

Suggestions:-
1/ Don't use the 4 way post, use a single tool mount (in this case)
2/ Extend the tool further away from the tool post, giving more clearance from the chuck
3/ Use a handle attached to the mandrel and turn the spindle by hand (Useful for short threads right up to a face). (Don't forget to remove the handle once the thread is cut)
4/ Buy a set of thread chasers from tracy Tools and use them at 90 degrees to thread axis - super finish every time.
5/ Use a smaller chuck (If you have one) or better still, collets.
6/ Ignore suggested cutting speeds for the material, because you and the lathe can't stop quickly enough to miss the chuck.
Don't get despondent, as others have said, once you have mastered this, you will look back and wonder what the fuss was all about. Its a bit like parting off - scary at first.
BobH

JasonB11/05/2017 07:43:43
avatar
25215 forum posts
3105 photos
1 articles

You could get yourself a 5Ccollet chuck then the topslide will pass under it, also puts the work slightly further from the headstock/screw cover.

I use the left to right method quite often as when working to a step you can run the lathe as fast as you like without having to wory about disengaging the feed in a split second.

john carruthers11/05/2017 07:57:03
avatar
617 forum posts
180 photos

How about using an L shaped tool, like an internal threading tool?( the cutting tip would be at the top of the L from above).
Or the work could always be pulled round by hand but it would be laborious?

richardandtracy11/05/2017 08:35:11
avatar
943 forum posts
10 photos

Thanks Jason, you have just helped me hugely.

My WMT300 has no half nut, so there is no way I can release it coming up to a shoulder. Means I have always done threading by turning the spindle by hand and the cutter moving towards the headstock, which takes ages. Never occurred to me to do it the way that you showed in your photo. May have to return it to position by hand for subsequent cuts, but that's a 50% time saving.

Now, if I put a cam lever on the end of the spindle handle I made up to make it 'very quick release', that'll be it sorted both ways.

Regards,

Richard.

SillyOldDuffer11/05/2017 09:57:29
10668 forum posts
2415 photos
Posted by JA on 10/05/2017 23:03:08:

Dave

The only reason for going to the bottom of the class is that you failed to check the clearance between the chuck and everything else through the whole machining operation before starting the lathe.

...

You won't be bottom of the class for long.

JA

Might be worse than that! I did check the clearances before starting. I also managed to cut the first thread without getting it wrong and was in a state of unjustified confidence.

The cutting towards the chuck method goes horribly wrong for me because I'm likely to be too slow disengaging the lead-screw when the tool reaches the end slot. When that happens the half-nut is milliseconds away from a jam after which the only way out is to hit the big red button whilst praying that nothing has broken.

I can disengage reliably with the lathe screw-cutting at 30rpm but not at 150rpm. The higher speed makes a cleaner cut as well as being faster. (In one of Joe Pieczynski's Youtubes he screw cuts in towards the chuck at 235rpm, his fault is to disengage too early, for which reason he recommends cutting out left to right. )

Anyway, lots more suggestions to think about were posted whilst I was asleep. I'm starting to understand why people invest in 'luxuries' like 5C collets and quick change tool-posts. Many thanks chaps, now I'm more educated I should do better this morning.

Ta,

Dave

Hopper11/05/2017 11:24:45
avatar
7881 forum posts
397 photos
Posted by SillyOldDuffer on 10/05/2017 20:43:23:...

...I find threads cut with the top-slide at an angle are much less likely to tear than when I wind the tool in at a right-angle with the cross-slide. But the downside is that I crash if I'm slightly late disengaging the half-nut.

This isn't ideal! Am I doing something wrong?

Dave, there is no need to angle the topslide. You can leave it at a right-angle to the cross slide but still not have to feed the tool straight in. All you do is advance the top slide by half the amount you wind the cross-slide in. EG, if you take a .010" cut by winding the cross slide in by .010", you wind the top-slide toward the chuck by .005".

This moves the tool .010" inwards and .005" sideways, resulting in a tool movement equivalent to just under 30 degrees and results in the tool cutting on the one edge only, with a super light clean up cut on the other edge.

Using this method also means that once you get to full thread depth with your cut, but the nut still won't screw on, you can take a clean up cut or two by advancing the top slide a thou or two, then pulling it back a thou or two, so the both flanks of the thread are cleaned up without increasing depth. This method is commonly used in industry.

No, you dont have to calculate exact ratios to suit BSW profile etc. 1 unit inwards, half a unit sideways will work perfectly for both 60 degree and 55 degree threads. For Acme threads, you advance the top slide one quarter of the amount you wind in the cross slide.

duncan webster11/05/2017 11:44:10
5307 forum posts
83 photos

+1 for Hopper's method, just remember that on a metric lathe the crosslide reads diameter (ie twice the slide movement) whereas the top slide reads actual movement. Set top slide to zero, move cross slide till tool just touches job, set to zero, back off saddle clear of job, advance cross slide say 0.4mm, advance topslide 0.1 mm and take first cut, repeat ad nauseam. By initially setting everything to zero, the topslide reading keeps track of where you are, Oh yes I can forget!

I grind screwing tools so that the point is to the left of centre, and unless you're mass producing I wouldn't bother with carbide

Edited By duncan webster on 11/05/2017 11:44:31

JA11/05/2017 11:47:04
avatar
1605 forum posts
83 photos

Dave

Is this a first attempt or is for a specific job?

If it is the first, it would be far better to start with a something like a 1/2" mild steel bar. Put it in the chuck, face and centre drill the end. Then turn down the bar to the core thread diameter for a short distance. Next Release the bar and move it about to give about six inches of length, reclamp the chuck. Support the free end with a centre in the tailstock. Using a parting off tool at low speed cut a groove to the same diameter as the thread core close to the chuck.

Now everything is of a sensible size and you will have a run-out at either end of the thread for the tool.

Quick comment after reading Duncan's reply. If numbers are involved write them down on a piece of paper first.

JA

Edited By JA on 11/05/2017 11:49:36

Hopper11/05/2017 12:46:33
avatar
7881 forum posts
397 photos
Posted by JA on 11/05/2017 11:47:04:....
..If numbers are involved write them down on a piece of paper first....

Felt pen marks on the graduated handwheels work well too. Be sure to rub them off afterwards so they don't cause confusion on the next job.

All Topics | Latest Posts

Please login to post a reply.

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!

Find Model Engineer & Model Engineers' Workshop

Sign up to our Newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.

You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
cowells
Sarik
MERIDIENNE EXHIBITIONS LTD
Subscription Offer

Latest "For Sale" Ads
Latest "Wanted" Ads
Get In Touch!

Do you want to contact the Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop team?

You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.

Click THIS LINK for full contact details.

For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.

Digital Back Issues

Social Media online

'Like' us on Facebook
Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter
 Twitter Logo

Pin us on Pinterest

 

Donate

donate