KWIL | 22/08/2013 11:36:59 |
3681 forum posts 70 photos | My answer is also simple and quite straigt forward, I am not a member of any "social media" site and what is more, never will be. No further comments will be made. |
JA | 22/08/2013 12:11:27 |
![]() 1605 forum posts 83 photos | Patrick Since this is a market research exercise by a respected organisation: I am not a member of Facebook, Twitter etc. I see no reason to do so, I like carving lumps of metal etc, trying to make models, messing around with old vehicles and using them. This is for my own satisfaction and, if I want to, I can show the fruits of my labour by using the items or displaying them in public. I may even meet real people. I will go as far as saying I used to have doubts about forums in general but I have found this one some use with its members giving encouragement and words of wisedom. JA |
Bill Starling | 22/08/2013 12:21:35 |
102 forum posts 7 photos | This topic has raised so much comment that I can't resist adding my tuppence worth. Although I am a regular reader of the forum and beneficiary of the wisdom of others, I usually feel I lack the experience to contribute. However please don't go down the populist route of 'social media', particularly now that it is becoming so discredited. Most of the discussion on here is seeking or offering practical advice, not idle chatter. By all means try to involve more people in model engineering, but not by lowering your own standards and alienating your core followers. The reources would be better spent correcting the frequently mentioned snags with this website, which might of itself bring in more people. Bill PS Thanks to all those who continue to educate me. |
NJH | 22/08/2013 13:01:09 |
![]() 2314 forum posts 139 photos | Bill Thank you - words of wisdom indeed. Regards Norman |
JasonB | 22/08/2013 13:43:05 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | Posted by John McNamara on 22/08/2013 10:24:45:
Hello JasonB Your reply as a moderator to "Springbock", Bob's (Yes....rather direct) post. was harsh in my view, not businesslike. Why should my reply be business like? I am just a forum member like anybody else but have been asked to act as a moderator which I do on a voluntary basis. I am not employed by MTM. If I make a specific post as a Moderator I tend to sign it "Jason (Mod) " Not withstanding the rights and claims ambit or otherwise that the forum terms and conditions try to assert; conditions which may or may not conflict with the common law rights of the forum members. One instance being the UK Human rights act of 1998 and the right of privacy for individuals. The way I personally see it is if you wanted privicy why post on a public forum and by doing so agree to others having rights over what you have posted I think a less forceful and blunt response was in order. Thats upto you and your View and I'm entitled to mine I note Bob has made over 750 contributions to this forum. Clearly a conscientious and sincere effort to model making and light engineering. He deserves better. It is regular posters that make up the backbone of a forum, these are the people that attract "Views", and these viewers eyes are are what the paid advertisers on this site need to attract business. Unfortunately this forum does not have the facility to "view members posts" if it did and you were to read through the 750+ you may have a different view, I have PM'd you some reasons as I don't feel it right to post on the open forum I am assuming that you have discussed your written response with senior management, and that they support your wording. If not may I refer you to the following: As above I have no links to MTM so cannot discuss my replies with them and why would I as it was not a Moderators issue just stating the obvious one forum member to another. Moderation is also a principle of life. In ancient Greece, the temple of Apollo at Delphi bore the inscription Meden Agan (μηδὲν ἄγα&nu - 'Nothing in excess'. Doing something "in moderation" means not doing it excessively. Believe me my reply was moderate to what I was thinking ............................................................
Jason (replying as a forum member not a Moderator) |
John Stevenson | 22/08/2013 14:20:00 |
![]() 5068 forum posts 3 photos | Way to go Jason
John S. Posting as a bald headed, grumply old twat and not even as a forum member, let alone a moderator.
PS> Forgot the fat prefix. |
Jo | 22/08/2013 14:31:58 |
198 forum posts | Yes there seems to be a bit of confusion here where employees of the website owners are now apearing left right and centre as "moderators". In my view this is not correct and degrading the excellent work that the likes of JasonB and John Stevenson are doing for us out of the goodness of their hearts. On other forums there is a clearer distinction made between owners/employees and moderators, maybe they should make it clearer here. Jo |
John McNamara | 22/08/2013 14:35:47 |
![]() 1377 forum posts 133 photos | Hello Jason I was unaware that you were not employed by the magazine publishers. That was a mistake on my part. 3000+ posts is a big community effort on your part. My reason for posting was an attempt to prompt management into addressing some of the issues that were mentioned. it was not intended to attack you directly rather a wake up for the company. Unfortunately you were swept up in the argument. Knowing now that you are not connected to the company it would have been worded differently. It is surprising that the management has not addressed the failures of the website, it has generated a very large number of complaining threads over several years. I fail to understand why they wish to claim unilateral ownership of users postings. Why upset the website membership and the magazine readership? Gee.... they are the companies bread and butter. Regards Edited By John McNamara on 22/08/2013 14:39:08 |
Russell Eberhardt | 22/08/2013 15:05:09 |
![]() 2785 forum posts 87 photos | Posted by JasonB on 22/08/2013 08:12:20:
Your use of this Website constitutes your agreement to all such terms................................"
Hi Jason, I'm not sure that a statement like that means anything. There is no guanantee that a user of the site has read it and thus had an opertunity to agree or disagree. Besides which it is hidden away in a link in the small print that few people read. Russell |
jason udall | 22/08/2013 15:17:46 |
2032 forum posts 41 photos | Just my opinion The heat in this thread ( and "new website templates") is probably due partly to the "unrest" thar the new subs/. Demise of the free archive, has stirred up , coupled with the frustrations of the forum software...... If the content of the facebook page is going to continue in the vein it has so far.. ( advertising bill board)..then the regulars here can safely ignore it. If the publishers think that advertising to hopefully a much wider audience via social media will be less trouble than the maintance ( yes I am sure there is some even if it doesn't always show) of this site/forum then maybe thats for them to judge. .I do wonder just what arceuro as sponsors think. Edited By jason udall on 22/08/2013 15:20:35 |
Michael Gilligan | 22/08/2013 16:38:35 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Russell Eberhardt on 22/08/2013 15:05:09:
Posted by JasonB on 22/08/2013 08:12:20:
Your use of this Website constitutes your agreement to all such terms................................"
Hi Jason, I'm not sure that a statement like that means anything. There is no guanantee that a user of the site has read it and thus had an opertunity to agree or disagree. Besides which it is hidden away in a link in the small print that few people read. Russell . Russell, Few people read the EULA [End User License Agreement] when they install software ... but that doesn't stop it being a legal agreement. Caveat Emptor, et Caveat Utilitor MichaelG.
Edited By Michael Gilligan on 22/08/2013 16:41:52 |
Russell Eberhardt | 22/08/2013 17:01:07 |
![]() 2785 forum posts 87 photos | Posted by Michael Gilligan on 22/08/2013 16:38:35:
Few people read the EULA [End User License Agreement] when they install software ... but that doesn't stop it being a legal agreement. Agreed, but you do usually have to tick a box to say that you agree to it. Russell. |
Springbok | 22/08/2013 17:43:54 |
![]() 879 forum posts 34 photos | As a grumpy old git of well over 70 and a lot of people on this forum have met me I stick to my WW2 guns |
mick | 22/08/2013 17:53:12 |
421 forum posts 49 photos | Hi Patrick and welcome. I only started following your thread this morning, but I bet your glad you didn't mention CNC machining in your opening post, as that would have really provoked a response!!!!! |
Springbok | 22/08/2013 19:41:08 |
![]() 879 forum posts 34 photos | Mick |
Peter Tucker | 22/08/2013 19:42:04 |
185 forum posts | For the purposes of market research I will not be joining face book, twitter, ect. Peter.
|
Stub Mandrel | 22/08/2013 19:53:33 |
![]() 4318 forum posts 291 photos 1 articles | As a youthful 50 year old We are all on the same side, aren't we? Twenty years ago we all would have mocked the idea that a forum like this might take up as much of our time as reading a magazine. We would never have believed in home cnc and 3 d printers. I think some of us are being a bit too conservative, we might not want to use 'social media' (but if so why are we on this site?) We are like any like-minded group and suspicious of anything that might attract in others. The odd vistor who looks for advice and stumbles in gets a good welcome, but we all would worry at the idea of hundreds of GCSE students seeking 'help with their project' suddenly descending. Truth is, in 40 years most of us will be dead and the model engineering flame will be carried on by some of today's youngsters. I wonder what they will make, but I bet the standards will be just as high. No doubt they will be equally worried that their 3-D interactive virtual club will be invaded by spotty teenagers in 2053. Let's all relax, look around and realise that those who get the most out of model engineering interactions on facebook are as unlikely to want to be here as we want to be there - but there will be some open minded elders and inquiring younsters who make the transition. Neil |
Springbok | 22/08/2013 19:56:54 |
![]() 879 forum posts 34 photos | Jason'
|
Michael Gilligan | 22/08/2013 22:05:36 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Russell Eberhardt on 22/08/2013 17:01:07:
Posted by Michael Gilligan on 22/08/2013 16:38:35:
Few people read the EULA [End User License Agreement] when they install software ... but that doesn't stop it being a legal agreement. Agreed, but you do usually have to tick a box to say that you agree to it. Russell. . Russell, Your point is very well made !! I thought I would point you to the Join Forum page ... BUT you are absolutely right: The Terms & Conditions are "Hidden in Plain Sight" MichaelG.
Note to the Forum Administrators: Please update this page, to make it clear that joining the Forum constitutes acceptance of the Terms & Conditions.
|
pcb1962 | 23/08/2013 10:35:28 |
65 forum posts | Patrick, as others have said, you really have been handed a poisoned chalice here, it's hard to imagine a demographic less likely to engage with facebook and twitter than model engineers. Since you don't seem to be a model engineer yourself (apologies if I'm mistaken) it might be a good idea to get out and meet a few at your local society and at some of the exhibitions and find out what the typical
|
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.