Wolfie | 27/01/2012 16:53:44 |
![]() 502 forum posts | Oh man don't any of you lot give up the day job ![]() ![]() Anyway I spent this aft cleaning the old thing up and its come up OK. Its a Moore and Wright and my mam reckons it was my granddads. And being as he's been dead for nearly 30 years its probably laid there all that time. Looking at Terrys handy photos I have a 1" micrometer in 0.001 increments. It cleaned up OK but its stiff-ish especially in the lower half inch and I can't use the little ratchet thing to turn it. The faces look ok and square. Also it has some kind of deposits on the outer barrel which make it a bit difficult to read. You can see them in the pic, a sort of dark mottling. Incidentally I checked it out against my digital vernier and the vernier was within half a thou every time. Edited By Wolfie on 27/01/2012 16:55:57 |
Billy Mills | 27/01/2012 17:22:56 |
377 forum posts | Peter what do you want for £8.00 a NPL certificate as well? Electronic calipers use mass produced printed circuits to produce the two electrode patterns so you can knock them out cheaply. Some makers select the best and junk the rest. Rework is not going to happen at the low cost end of the market. The capacitance sensing and counting circuits often run all of the time that the battery is installed, the on/off switch may only disable the display so there is a small battery drain with some types. The cheaper models seem to have a higher drain than some high end models. If that is a worry pop out the coin cell between uses. The batteries are worth buying at MEX, last year you could buy 5 silver oxide cells for £1.99. Wolfie- try unscrewing the barrel and a drop of light oil on the thread. |
Brian Dickinson | 27/01/2012 18:56:29 |
![]() 62 forum posts 13 photos | I just love how everybody tries to outdo the last post.
Keep em coming.
Bri
|
Speedy Builder5 | 27/01/2012 19:02:35 |
2878 forum posts 248 photos | I have a fraction marked vernier calliper measuring to the nearest 1/128" (0.0078") on one side and mm on the other side. Sometimes helps with the old imperial fractional inch drawings. |
Andrew Johnston | 27/01/2012 19:26:46 |
![]() 7061 forum posts 719 photos | I was under the impression that the early Mitutoyo digital calipers used two optical gratings at a slight angle to each other. So the Moire fringes were a true optical effect and nothing to do with verniers. Of course I could be wrong. ![]() The reason I rarely use vernier calipers is because I have a full set of micrometers from 1" to 16" and nearly a full set of the metric equivalents. Where's the smiley for a smug bar steward? Regards, Andrew On a bit of a swerve I do use a vernier protractor occasionally, although I don't find it that easy to use for measuring, as opposed to marking out. |
Stub Mandrel | 27/01/2012 20:41:17 |
![]() 4318 forum posts 291 photos 1 articles | Referring WAAAAY back to my comment about .250" and .251" is that you really need something reading to ten times better than that (micrometer) to be sure... That said all my vernier calipers (including a Workzone one) read 1.000 on the 1" test bar for my 1-2" micrometer. Finally I think the correct description for the digital spanners is not "moire" but "quadrature" - generating an ouput through the comparison of two signals 90 degrees out of phase. Neil |
Ian Abbott | 27/01/2012 21:19:47 |
![]() 279 forum posts 21 photos | "...interfering sinusoidal inputs..."
Isn't that when you stick your nose in where it 'aint wanted?
And
Over the years, I've accumulated digital, vernier, dial and fractional callipers in metric and Imperial, and inside and outside mics. up to 6".
Now, I can't read any of them without a x10 loupe!
Ian
|
Steve Garnett | 28/01/2012 00:05:51 |
837 forum posts 27 photos | Posted by Andrew Johnston on 27/01/2012 19:26:46: I was under the impression that the early Mitutoyo digital calipers used two optical gratings at a slight angle to each other. So the Moire fringes were a true optical effect and nothing to do with verniers. Of course I could be wrong. ![]() I don't know - I've never been able to justify buying any of Mitutoyo's calipers! But along those lines, there's one more interesting patent from 1987, which uses the word Vernier in the title, and works on both rotary and linear scales. Much clearer to understand, too. |
Nicholas Farr | 28/01/2012 05:01:56 |
![]() 3988 forum posts 1799 photos | Posted by Versaboss on 27/01/2012 10:02:12:
Hmm, I wonder what the subtle differences are between - clalipers - claipers - clipers and - calipers. (N. Farr; 27. 1., 02:08 (too late or too early???) ) I only own the last type I believe, but I'm sure Wolfie would like to know also Greetings, Hansrudolf Hi Hansrudolf, opps!
![]() Regards Nick. |
Terryd | 28/01/2012 05:47:22 |
![]() 1946 forum posts 179 photos | Posted by Steve Garnett on 28/01/2012 00:05:51: Posted by Andrew Johnston on 27/01/2012 19:26:46: I was under the impression that the early Mitutoyo digital calipers used two optical gratings at a slight angle to each other. So the Moire fringes were a true optical effect and nothing to do with verniers. Of course I could be wrong. ![]() I don't know - I've never been able to justify buying any of Mitutoyo's calipers! But along those lines, there's one more interesting patent from 1987, which uses the word Vernier in the title, and works on both rotary and linear scales. Much clearer to understand, too. Hi Steve, That is a vernier system and of course the petition is much easier to read and comprehend the underlying theory. Best regards Terry |
Terryd | 28/01/2012 06:00:52 |
![]() 1946 forum posts 179 photos | Posted by Wolfie on 27/01/2012 16:53:44: Oh man don't any of you lot give up the day job ![]() ![]() Anyway I spent this aft cleaning the old thing up and its come up OK. Its a Moore and Wright and my mam reckons it was my granddads. And being as he's been dead for nearly 30 years its probably laid there all that time. Looking at Terrys handy photos I have a 1" micrometer in 0.001 increments. It cleaned up OK but its stiff-ish especially in the lower half inch and I can't use the little ratchet thing to turn it. The faces look ok and square. Also it has some kind of deposits on the outer barrel which make it a bit difficult to read. You can see them in the pic, a sort of dark mottling. Incidentally I checked it out against my digital vernier and the vernier was within half a thou every time. Edited By Wolfie on 27/01/2012 16:55:57 Hi Wolfie, I hope I'm not being too obvious, but the knurled ring in the cutout in the frame is a locking ring. Have you tried twisting that? Looking from the 'Anvil' end it turns clockwise to free it. The micrometer can be cleaned, adjusted and re-set, it is not complicated as they are quite simple instruments. Inside the 'barrel' is a spindle with a screw and nut which adjusts the amount of play and stiffness of it. Here are some pictures and instructions. There is a special spanner provided with each micrometer to do this work. It is usually kept in the 'spectacle case' that the micrometer is provided with, basically a small 'C' spanner. Regards Terry |
Gordon W | 28/01/2012 10:18:09 |
2011 forum posts | Wolfie, you can clean it up no problem, when you get it right try and find somebody to show you how to hold it when in use, ie. one handed. Also try not to use the ratchet at the end, they are more trouble than they are worth. Try to get a feel for it, it will all come . |
Wolfie | 28/01/2012 11:13:17 |
![]() 502 forum posts | Yes I discovered the adjusting nut and also the locking ring. It seems to be the locking ring thats the problem. Without that in its very smooth. I've had it to pieces and liberally added clock oil and worked it. The piece that screws right out doesn't seem to come apart apart from the clicky bit at the top. The biggest hassle is the discoloured barrel can hardly read it in places ![]() |
Terryd | 28/01/2012 11:39:50 |
![]() 1946 forum posts 179 photos | Posted by Wolfie on 28/01/2012 11:13:17: Yes I discovered the adjusting nut and also the locking ring. It seems to be the locking ring thats the problem. Without that in its very smooth. I've had it to pieces and liberally added clock oil and worked it. The piece that screws right out doesn't seem to come apart apart from the clicky bit at the top. The biggest hassle is the discoloured barrel can hardly read it in places ![]() Hi Wolfie, at least you have a nice heritage piece in memory of your grandad. New ones aren't too expensive and are quite accurate due to teh way they are made and the basic screw concept. There are usually loads on eBay as well. Best regards Terry |
Ian S C | 28/01/2012 12:40:46 |
![]() 7468 forum posts 230 photos | Got a 0 to 1 mike here that I bought for 2/6 back in 1962, it's a DCMT, as avertised in Model Engineer of the time, and before, it's simple, no lock, no ratchet, and the adjustment is via a screw under the fixed anvil, but it seems quite accurate. I bought it at about the same time as I bought my Super Adept lathe. Since then I have got fancier mikes Starret, and Mitutoyo, and a 50 to 75 mm Russian one from a second hand shop. The Russian sailors sell just about anything on their ships that can be moved, its a wonder they manage to ever get home. I do have a 150 and a 200 mm digital calipers, and one thats quite handy for rough jobs, columbus gauge/ calipers, looks like vernier calipers but much cheaper. Ian S C |
The Merry Miller | 28/01/2012 12:57:34 |
![]() 484 forum posts 97 photos | Ian, I have two of the DCMT mikes been languishing in my tool cupboard for centuries. I did consider chopping them down and using the barrel sections as a micro stops on the Myford, this I still may do. Len. P. |
Peter G. Shaw | 28/01/2012 14:27:50 |
![]() 1531 forum posts 44 photos | Billy, Yes a NPL certificate would be nice - at least then I'd have some idea about it's calibration! Seriously though, yes I am aware that they don't necessarily switch off - there is an internet article somewhere about this in which Mitutoyo came out best by a long way in this respect. What I do NOT accept is that the degree of variability is not consistent, ie the Aldi digital caliper gives varying readings both plus & minus of nominal such that it is impossible to interpolate with any hope of being anywhere near. The Rolson digital caliper is incorrect but more or less linear which means that it is usable as long as the user is aware of the discrepancy. Taking the battery out is what I now do, but lets face it, even the given specification of the Rolson digital caliper is somewhat poorer than the Starrett dial caliper yet both have the same nominal resolution and capacity. Hence, given the problems of inserting/removing the battery together with the poorer specification means that for this rank amateur, "manual rules OK!" Regards, Peter G. Shaw |
Martin W | 28/01/2012 19:37:40 |
940 forum posts 30 photos | Hi
While browsing I found this site that sells callipers, micrometers etc from the bargain basement range to stuff that costs more than my lathe. They have kit with a resolution of 1 micron/accuracy 2 microns at very reasonable prices. So if its accuracy you want then
![]() Martin |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.