Cornish Jack | 18/08/2017 11:26:21 |
1228 forum posts 172 photos | G'dy all. I'm sure there has recently been a thread dealing with heavy metals but I can't find it. Heavily into workshop tidying/clearing and found, in my toolbox, a 2.25" x 5/8"(That's fradections!! rgds Bill |
duncan webster | 18/08/2017 11:50:08 |
5307 forum posts 83 photos | measure it's specific gravity by weighing it in air then submerged in water. The difference gives you the weight of water displaced, and 1 kg of water weighs 1 kg, so you can work out the volume. Divide the weight in air by the volume and hey presto. If you suspect it is uranium, don't be tempted to cut it, it is an alpha emitter and a heavy metal poison, so inhaling the dust would not be a good idea. Uranium is 18.9 kg/litre, tungsten is 19.6. The difference is enough if you're careful with your measurements. Freshly machined Uranium is silvery white, but it oxidises fairly quickly to a dull dark grey colour. Search wikipedia for a photo. Just hope it isn't Uranium as getting rid of it safely and legally will probably be a nightmare |
Henry Artist | 18/08/2017 12:06:46 |
![]() 121 forum posts 46 photos | A Geiger counter might be useful... They're not cheap to buy though quartz fiber dosimeters can be obtained for a reasonable sum. If it turns out to be a ferrous metal you could do a Spark Test. Section 7.4 of "The Model Engineer's Handbook" by Tubal Cain has the details for this. The next test would be to determine the specific weight and density of the material. For this you need to know the weight (easy enough to determine) and the volume it occupies. To calculate the volume either measure it or immerse it in a liquid and see what volume it displaces. Then it's just a matter of looking up the density of the material you have. If it happens to burst into flames when immersed in water then there's a good chance it was a bar of sodium... |
Hopper | 18/08/2017 12:12:00 |
![]() 7881 forum posts 397 photos | Uraniium? Yikes. Seems like it's more common to use either tungsten or Mallory metal for crank balancing. Are you sure it's not one of those? |
Swarf, Mostly! | 18/08/2017 13:36:32 |
753 forum posts 80 photos | There used to be an alloy called 'GEC Heavy Metal' (made by guess who?!) that was intended to be used for counter-weights to balance aircraft flight surfaces (elevators, ailerons & rudders). Dense was good as the counter-weights balanced at a shorter radius giving a smaller swept volume and so not needing as much space within the non-moving parts of the airframe. I've no idea of its constitution. Perhaps Andrew knows? Best regards, Swarf, Mostly! |
Geoff Theasby | 18/08/2017 13:49:01 |
615 forum posts 21 photos | Depleted uranium WAS used, but now Tungsten, I believe. Geoff
|
Geoff Theasby | 18/08/2017 13:57:12 |
615 forum posts 21 photos | From PPPrune - "RUDDER/ELEVATOR BALANCE WEIGHT - REMOVAL/INSTALLATION |
Muzzer | 18/08/2017 14:21:30 |
![]() 2904 forum posts 448 photos | Posted by duncan webster on 18/08/2017 11:50:08:
measure it's specific gravity by weighing it in air then submerged in water. The difference gives you the weight of water displaced, and 1 kg of water weighs 1 kg, so you can work out the volume. Divide the weight in air by the volume and hey presto. Surely you will get a much more accurate measure of its volume if you simply measure the diameter and length with precision tools, given that it is a length of round bar. I would expect the weight measurement to be the least accurate of the 2 unless you have some snazzy precision scales. The difference you cite between the densities is less than 4%, so your scales would need to be better than +/- 2% or so to be reasonably certain. Murray |
Cornish Jack | 18/08/2017 18:14:51 |
1228 forum posts 172 photos | Thank you to all for the responses. I'll do the S.G. calcs and see what gives. I'll also see if I can find the Matador 60 series in ME 'cos I think that I was trying to 'build to spec' and it would, presumably, have suggested appropriate material. Not sure if DU was regarded with such horror back then. rgds Bill |
Mark P. | 18/08/2017 18:57:38 |
![]() 634 forum posts 9 photos | We used to make really good riveting blocks from 707 ballance weights! These were I think DU. Mark P |
Roderick Jenkins | 18/08/2017 19:34:56 |
![]() 2376 forum posts 800 photos | Bill, The Matador 60 was published in RCM&E. I don't recall any requirement for extra weights for balancing, there's room for an adequately sized crank web. Cheers, Rod
|
Neil Wyatt | 18/08/2017 19:51:06 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Why does this make me think of Repo Man...
Advice is to wear gloves to handle and don't try machining it. Personally, I wouldn't walk around with it in my trouser pocket. You can probably sell it for a hefty sum to a company that knows how and is able to use it safely. Neil |
Ian S C | 19/08/2017 12:15:10 |
![]() 7468 forum posts 230 photos | If it's Uranium there will be little magnetic attraction, probably too small to be noticed. If it's Tungsten Carbide, it will possibly have either Nickle, or Cobalt in it and will be magnetic. Ian S C |
Hevanscc | 22/08/2017 20:25:12 |
89 forum posts 33 photos | Depleted uranium has the most radioactive U-235 isotope removed, leaving the much less radioactive part behind, so you are more in danger of radiation from bits of Dartmoor granite. Having said that, uranium is a toxic heavy metal like lead so avoid inhaling the dust. Hywel Edited By Hevanscc on 22/08/2017 20:25:44 |
not done it yet | 22/08/2017 21:26:19 |
7517 forum posts 20 photos | uranium is a toxic heavy metal like lead so avoid inhaling the dust. Except that uranium is radioactive and will be decaying inside you - not like lead which is just a nuisance and can be readily cleared from the system if diagnosed as a problem.
Alpha particles don't travel far, but are very destructive to dna etc due to their mass (compared with, say a beta particle which, while faster, has a mass of only 1/7000th of that of an alpha particle). Cannon ball versus ping pong ball comes to mind.
|
Phil Boyland | 23/08/2017 07:48:22 |
![]() 49 forum posts 13 photos | If you can file off a tiny pioece and pop it in the post I can chemically analyse it for you in work. You will knoiw then exactly what it is. |
duncan webster | 23/08/2017 17:09:48 |
5307 forum posts 83 photos | Posted by Hevanscc on 22/08/2017 20:25:12:
Depleted uranium has the most radioactive U-235 isotope removed, leaving the much less radioactive part behind, so you are more in danger of radiation from bits of Dartmoor granite. Having said that, uranium is a toxic heavy metal like lead so avoid inhaling the dust. Hywel Edited By Hevanscc on 22/08/2017 20:25:44 Natural Uranium is typically 0.7% U235, depleted is typically 0.25% . Granite can be 20ppm natural U, which is plainly a lot less U235 than DU This website is very informative. I strongly recommend you don't file a bit off until you know it isn't Uranium. |
Neil Wyatt | 23/08/2017 18:04:35 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | I strongly recommend you don't file a bit off until you know it isn't Uranium. Ditto. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.