YAK | 22/02/2014 21:55:08 |
58 forum posts 2 photos | I have just taken delivery of a Toolco 1130GV lathe. Similar to the Warco 280VF except it has a 38mm clearance through the headstock. It is held down with four bolts on the head stock and two bolts at the tail stock. How would I go about leveling? |
Gary Wooding | 22/02/2014 22:23:30 |
1074 forum posts 290 photos | The objective in levelling is to ensure that the lathe bed is not twisted; if the bed is twisted then everything you cut on the lathe will be tapered to some extent. Perhaps the easiest way is by the use of a precision level. You place the level, at right angles to the bed, somewhere convenient on the saddle which you then carefully move from one end of the bed to the other while observing the bubble. There is no requirement to centralise the level, but you must ensure that it doesn't vary along the bed. Any movement in the bubble indicates a twisted bed. You adjust the bolts and or shims until you are satisfied. Unfortunately, precision levels are not exactly cheap, and are not needed very often, so its probably best to borrow one if you can. There are methods that don't need a precision level, but they are not so straightforward. |
NJH | 22/02/2014 22:54:39 |
![]() 2314 forum posts 139 photos | Lots of information out there and a subject that has been discussed here a few times. One snag with this forum however is that I find it very difficult to look back through old threads for information. So ..I did an internet search and quickly found some info. For a starter then click HERE and/ or HERE Good luck! Norman
|
MattK | 22/02/2014 22:56:26 |
![]() 39 forum posts 7 photos | This has been covered a number of times. When I have done it I have turned a test bar and measured the diameters at each end. Google "Rollies Dads method" for a way to do this with a minimum of kit or look at Harold Hall's site who explains how he does this. I used both these methods and got good results. |
DMB | 23/02/2014 09:03:34 |
1585 forum posts 1 photos | I recollect seeing piccy + text somewhere, of a novel method which I wish I could find again to study it and decide on its accuracy. It was I think an arrangement of wood base on lathe bed with an upright of timber securely fixed to base and a string-and-weight secured to the top of the upright. Obviously, the greater the height of pendulum suspension the more sensitive this would be. Cannot understand why I have not seen any mention of this recently. I dont think it was in a book or mag. Does anyone else recall seeing this on this or another forum? |
Gary Wooding | 23/02/2014 09:44:11 |
1074 forum posts 290 photos | The divisions on a typical precision precision level are marked as 0.05mm/mtr. or 0.0005"/10". A plumb bob displacement of 0.5mm (which is about as accurate as you could hope to be) would need a suspension string about 10mtrs long for equivalent accuracy. |
maurice bennie | 23/02/2014 10:10:45 |
164 forum posts 1 photos | Hi DMB I have a "plum bob" or is it plomb bob of my grandfather .It is a plank of wood 3ft x4"x3/4" a 2" hole at each end ,joined by a 1/2" slot. string fastened inside the hole opposite the slot ( slot is parallel to outer edge of plank) in the hole at other end ,a lump of lead hangs on string .When plank is held against wall it will show if it is upright Easy to make and easier to see than a spirit level. Sorry I cannot give you a picture camera bust. Hope you can understand my description. Maurice |
Ian S C | 23/02/2014 10:18:16 |
![]() 7468 forum posts 230 photos | Maurice, you could make a modern version from a bit of box section aluminium extrusion. Ian S C |
Philrob27 | 23/02/2014 10:26:31 |
16 forum posts | If you have a iphone/Ipad down load the free Clinometer app from I store did the job when I set up my lathe. |
mgnbuk | 23/02/2014 10:36:10 |
1394 forum posts 103 photos | £50 delivered for a 200mm 0.02/M level on Ebay (291067274469) Or for £55 delivered a 150mm box level (271385670211) - will be more useful when you get a milling machine. Neither are that expensive when compared with a new machine. If "Rollies Dad's Method" is so great, why does industry use levels ? Regards, Nigel B. |
Gary Wooding | 23/02/2014 11:37:50 |
1074 forum posts 290 photos | The Android/IOS clinometer apps I've looked at imply a resolution of 0.1 degrees, which corresponds to approx. 1.75mm/mtr. Not really precision, or am I looking at the wrong apps? |
YAK | 23/02/2014 20:21:07 |
58 forum posts 2 photos | Thanks all, I have a suitable level and I set up my ML7 with it's leveling screws with no problem at all. It is just that this lathe has 4 bolting holes on the headstock itself. All in close proximency to each other with the tail stock mounting much further away. I think, what I am trying to say is does it 6 adjuster bolts?
Terry |
YAK | 23/02/2014 20:38:46 |
58 forum posts 2 photos | Jason B, you have a Warco 280, how did you do yours?
Terry. |
Michael Gilligan | 23/02/2014 20:57:04 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Terry, Looking at the photo , it doesn't really appear that they had levelling in mind. The headstock, with a bolt at each corner shouln't move far, and the support at the tailstock end [despite having only two bolts] has an uncommonly large footprint. ... Sorry, that doesn't really help; it's just an observation. MichaelG. |
John Hewes | 23/02/2014 22:20:29 |
22 forum posts 2 photos | Hi, this is timely for me as I am just about to reinstall my Boxford, and want to do it properly this time. I don't have a precision level and was wondering if anyone in or around N.E.Northants (I live near Thrapston), has one they would be prepared to lend me to help out. I'd be happy to leave a deposit and would only need it for a couple of days.
Fingers crossed, Kind regards
John |
Thor 🇳🇴 | 24/02/2014 05:44:32 |
![]() 1766 forum posts 46 photos | Hi Terry, I have a 290 lathe and used two 15mm thick steel plates with holes for bolting to the bottom of the headstock and tailstock. At front end rear end I drilled a hole and tapped MF 14 x 1 and made four leveling screws. The first photo shows a sketch (not my lathe, just to illustrate the idea): Here are a couple of photos from my 290F lathe: The height adjustment is done with a suitable spanner underneath the grey steel plate - the head of the leveling screw is underneath the steel plate and has a square head. I drilled 8mm dia. holes through the leveling screws and use M8 bolts to tighten them down after adjustment. Thor
Edited By Thor on 24/02/2014 05:55:55 |
Bazyle | 24/02/2014 09:01:42 |
![]() 6956 forum posts 229 photos | If you have 4 bolts at the headstock end you just tighten them down first to something flat and do all the adjustment at the tailstock end. Unless you are bolting the headstock to a random lump of stone that is far from flat you will not be applying any twist or distortion there. If in doubt check under each headstock hole before bolting with a feeler gauge and shim with drinks can. Remember you are not adjusting for 'level' as in surface of a pond but 'no twist' in the bed. So it doesn't matter if if the headstock starts off not perfectlly level. |
Douglas Johnston | 24/02/2014 09:37:32 |
![]() 814 forum posts 36 photos | With all the fancy electronic stuff available these days it would be great if someone could come up with a cheap level with high repeatable resolution. For setting up a lathe or mill one would only need a range of a few degrees and this might make the construction easier. I have one of the square electronic levels that cost about £20 and find it useful at times but the resolution is not good enopugh for this task. Doug |
Michael Gilligan | 24/02/2014 10:16:27 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Bazyle on 24/02/2014 09:01:42:
If you have 4 bolts at the headstock end you just tighten them down first to something flat and do all the adjustment at the tailstock end. Unless you are bolting the headstock to a random lump of stone that is far from flat you will not be applying any twist or distortion there. If in doubt check under each headstock hole before bolting with a feeler gauge and shim with drinks can. Remember you are not adjusting for 'level' as in surface of a pond but 'no twist' in the bed. So it doesn't matter if if the headstock starts off not perfectlly level. . Bazyle, I think we're on the same wavelength [see my earlier comment] Your approach seems entirely reasonable, with one small caveat; When the headstock end is first bolted-down, there needs to be a small gap under the foot at the tailstock end [otherwise the bed might already be being stressed]. If it were mine, I would first insert a thin spacer [a piece of Gauge Plate with four clearance holes] under the headstock. MichaelG. |
Gary Wooding | 24/02/2014 11:41:43 |
1074 forum posts 290 photos | Yak, It's not necessary to level both ends of the lathe - it's sufficient to adjust one end (choose the easiest) so that it matches the other. A lathe doesn't need to be actually level - lathes on ships can't be level, but they work OK because they have no twist in the bed. If the headstock end is the most difficult to adjust, run the carriage up the headstock and place the level on it. Move the carriage towards the tailstock and watch the level. If it moves more than you like, adjust the tailstock end to compensate. When the bubble movement is acceptable, tighten the bolts and check again. If it's still OK, you're done. You're not seeking to level the bubble, you're only trying to make it the same all along the bed. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.