Forum sponsored by:

MEW 162 - Phoenix Battery Drills

Is this dangerous or what?

Search for: in Thread Title in

Steve Garnett	17/03/2010 20:21:47
837 forum posts 27 photos	I don't have any problems with the concept of converting battery drills to being 'corded' ones - I've been doing it for years, for exactly the reasons given in the article. What does worry me quite a lot though is that Martin appears to have used IEC 16A sockets on the drills. As a result of this, I'm starting a book - who's going to be the first to admit to having the mains plugged straight into a 12v DC Drill, probably by a completely unsuspecting third party? The other things I'm wondering are; how big the almost inevitable bang will be, and whether anybody's insurance will cover the potential consequences? On the drills I've done, I left the cord permanently attached to the drill, and had a connector on the other end only. Is there a more sensible connector to use? Of course there is. For years, there's been an XLR standard for using 4-pin connectors for battery power, and CPC sell them, so there's no problem there. Each pin is rated at 10A, and if you double up the positive and negative wires so that each uses two pins in the connector, then you've got a greater current rating than the IEC connector has anyway - and also, it latches so it won't keep falling out, as the IEC ones are prone to do in anything mobile - which is why, even with mains appliances, they aren't recommended for this type of application. No, it's not just me - this really is a bit crazy.
David Clark 1	17/03/2010 20:25:13
3357 forum posts 112 photos 10 articles	Hi There The original drills used mains connectors. The article conversion is done with low voltage ones. regards David
John Shepherd	17/03/2010 20:45:49
222 forum posts 7 photos	I sent this email to David Clark as soon as I read the article - In the interests of safety I'm sure he wont mind me repeating it here. I read with interest the 'Phoenix Battery Drills' article by Martin Gearing. I would certainly not subject him to a flogging for connecting a 9v Drill to a 12v battery as he fears some would but I might (metaphorically) suggest it for showing his use of IEC mains connectors. I accept that Martin has moved on to Speakon plugs and I have no problem with those but there is a real danger that someone could plug a mains lead into a battery powered drill modified with a IEC socket. This has the potential to cause serious or even fatal injury. I urge you to warn your readers not to follow this example at the earliest opportunity. John Shepherd
Steve Garnett	17/03/2010 20:59:53
837 forum posts 27 photos	Despite what David implies, the article doesn't suggest using Speakons for anything other than the battery box - I've just read it again and it's pretty specific about this: In the first paragraph on P44 it says "The other end of the lead has to have a Speakon plug fitted", directly implying that this isn't the case at the drill end, even though the later pictures show perhaps something different. Say what you like, but this really isn't made clear in the text. In fact, it's not even mentioned anywhere that I can find. So if both John and I have clearly been given this impression from the article, I'd say that there's a pretty good chance that others will be too. Edited By Steve Garnett on 17/03/2010 21:01:15
David Clark 1	17/03/2010 21:15:35
3357 forum posts 112 photos 10 articles	Hi There When I first saw the article I thought the same as you, mains socket - no. Then I read the rest and looked at the photos and list of components and it clearly says on photo 4 caption Strain relief bushes in place with cables installed. Photos 9 and 10 clearly show strain relief cables and Speakon plugs and sockets. The text in column 1 on page 44 says A filler piece to allow the installation to the handle of a cable bush, preferably with strain releif. I don't see a problem with the article. regards David Edited By David Clark 1 on 17/03/2010 21:16:06
Steve Garnett	17/03/2010 21:24:38
837 forum posts 27 photos	Sorry, I still think that I'd have liked to have seen a specific statement about this, and that certainly isn't there; nowhere does it specifically say that using IEC sockets is a distinctly bad idea, and I think it should. I know it's your call, but even so...
Brian Still	17/03/2010 21:40:46
13 forum posts	Hi I think that the problem with the article is that it shows photos of an early version that is definitely poor design. I have no problem with using the drills with an external battery if it is carried out to the later design. It's a pity that three photos show the earlier version. It is difficult to prevent this kind of thing happening as we perceive dangers differently to each other. David, I am impressed with the way both magazines are now being produced so please carry on with the good work despite criticism. Regards Brian
David Clark 1	17/03/2010 21:50:39
3357 forum posts 112 photos 10 articles	Hi There I will put something in the magazine next issue but how far do I dumb down the content? We are talking all sorts of dangers in every issue. Do I treat everyone like an idiot until they prove otherwise? regards David
Steve Garnett	17/03/2010 22:43:55
837 forum posts 27 photos	Okay, my take on it: I don't think it's about dumbing down at all. You can put all the dangerous stuff you like in the mag, but you are still morally obliged, I feel, to point out dangers, especially ones that aren't perhaps quite so obvious. And this probably applies most to tooling that could be used outside the workshop, potentially by almost anybody else. So I'd say that really, what needs to be said about any particular situation is simply a matter of risk assessment. If there's electricity involved, then err on the side of caution, simply because it's invisible. If something's visible, then there's a far greater chance of common sense coming into play anyway, so I'd say that it was less of an issue. I think that intelligent people will appreciate almost any comment about safety for exactly what it is - because they are intelligent. If the idiots have anything about them at all, then they should be grateful that somebody is looking out for them. I'm sorry if that sounds patronising - I can't immediately think of a better way of putting it. Oh, and I agree utterly with the comments about good work in the mag production. This is meant to be positive criticism, not the negative stuff - I hope that's clear, because that's entirely the way it's meant. Edited By Steve Garnett on 17/03/2010 22:46:21
KWIL	18/03/2010 09:04:59
3681 forum posts 70 photos	Rather than being specific about which connector to use, etc. the ones used could be stated as being an example (hopefully of being good practice), HOWEVER an overiding statement such as " Electricity can kill, if you do not fully understand what you are doing, consult somebody for advice who does understand, "
Steve Garnett	18/03/2010 09:31:18
837 forum posts 27 photos	Okay, I can think of perhaps a slightly better way of putting this into a bit of context. When Martin, who is clearly an intelligent guy, first did this conversion he was clearly concerned with getting a result - by whatever means was to hand. And in the circumstances in which he was operating (presumably surrounded by other intelligent people), what he did, he may not have been considered to be too much of a risk. But nevertheless, he did it. And if he makes even the suggestion that it's perfectly possible to get it working like this, then other people might consider the same course of action, perhaps without assessing the risks in the same way. That doesn't make them idiots - it's just that not all things occur to all intelligent people at the same time. And not all intelligent people are intelligent in the same way, either, and the potential consequences may simply have escaped them. It happens - probably more often than one would like to think... And that's just the intelligent people. You can work your way down from there.
DMB	18/03/2010 09:49:44
1585 forum posts 1 photos	I think that David really ought to put in a warning such as `KWILL` suggests, in front of every copy of MEW if not ME as well, just to cover himself and proprietors. Maybe something like what appears in the front of many re-printed American books on mechanical / electrical subjects. Well done David, for vastly improving 2 already good mags. - keep it up!!! John.
Ian S C	18/03/2010 10:44:03
7468 forum posts 230 photos	John, the warnings are not only on books but on web sites too, usually worded so a kindergarten kids would understand it.My 9.6V drill ($2 with dead battery)died after 2 years use on my workshop low volt DC line-18V, must get another one,maybe 12/14v.I use the plug and socket from an old transistor radio, and wire permanantly wired into the drill.Ian S C
Circlip	18/03/2010 11:09:56
1723 forum posts	WARNING! If you stand in front of a bus you are likely to DIE if it hits you. Anyone attempting electrical work without knowing what the're doing or obeying basic safety rules deserves to be rushed into hospital for another cell to be implanted. Trouble is, it would probably be lonely. If the HSE entered ANY of our workshops they would put a closure notice on them, we ALL "Risk" it at times as has been proved many times on THIS forum. Sadly the words COMMON SENSE seem to have dissapeared from our vocabulary. Far better, on the cover of BOTH M/E and MEW, in 120 point, David should insist the words CAVEAT EMPTOR be printed in bright red. Regards Ian.
David Clark 1	18/03/2010 11:25:19
3357 forum posts 112 photos 10 articles	Hi There No matter what is done, someone will mess it up or cause something to happen. Reminds me of a youth opportunity lad we had many years ago. Will put the story in Ed's Bench in the next issue. regards David
KWIL	18/03/2010 11:39:07
3681 forum posts 70 photos	Reminds me of a youth, [not me I hasten to say], who, standing by a machine planer (wood), which was making its usual high pitched rotational noise, passed his flattened hand across the blade area, saying "is it working??" Tables were set flat and the guard was in place fortunately. You never can tell, intelligence does not enter into it.
KWIL	18/03/2010 11:39:29
3681 forum posts 70 photos	Edited By KWIL on 18/03/2010 11:52:16
David Clark 1	18/03/2010 11:45:48
3357 forum posts 112 photos 10 articles	Hi There I remeber once, just before christmas, it was very cold, the labourer was wandering around without a shirt or vest on. I thought it was strange. He had been moving a large tumbling barrel from one factory to another. Reassembled it and switched it on. He had lost a grub screw from the main shaft and had replaced it with a standard Allen screw. His overall had caught in the machine, it was nylon as well. The machine ripped of his overall, shirt and vest. He spent about a fortnight in hospital over Christmas. He was about 60 years old and had been working with machinery most of his life. regards David
Peter G. Shaw	18/03/2010 12:21:48
1531 forum posts 44 photos	Ok, this is my take on it. I think a lot of you are going well over the top on this. It is a suggestion of what could be done. It does not give full constructional details of how to do it, merely ideas. I think we should all accept that in any design there will always be experimental phases leading to improved designs: the fact that he has used mains connectors, and then later used something else is an example of this. Let's face it, just who is likely to use such a device? Joe Soap down the street who doesn't know one end of drill bit from another? No, it is going to be people who already have some mechanical/electrical/everything else skill. And we should, nay must, learn to trust people to know their own limitations and abilities. If we don't then we are going to end up doing nothing because of fear that someone else may do something daft. That way leads stagnation, and Lord knows, we have enough of that already in this country. Let me put it another way. My five year old grandson saw me inserting plastic plugs in a wall with a hammer. "Can I do that Grandad?". "Of course you can." And I gave him the plugs and the hammer. Now should I have done that? After all. he may have dropped the hammer onto his 5 year old toes! Or hit his 5 year old hand whilst holding the plug. That grandson, now getting on for 15 and doing an engineering course at school (and for that matter trusted by his teacher to act responsibly which is more than the teacher can say about other pupils), is now considering, and talking to his dad to see if they have a 14.4v drill for modification! With my blessing, and support! Come on people, lets apply some common sense to all of this. We are not (yet) ruled by 'Elf 'n' Safety' in which case nothing like this would ever see light of day. Incidently, whilst I haven't looked at the idea in any great detail, just suppose, the mains plugs and sockets used for the drill were wired the opposite way round to normal, ie the socket wired to the drill. This would mean that it was impossible to connect such a drill directly to the mains, would it not? Peter G. Shaw
Circlip	18/03/2010 12:29:08
1723 forum posts	Certainly make it easier to test the line connection

1 2 3 Next > Last >>

All Topics | Latest Posts

This thread is closed.

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!

Find Model Engineer & Model Engineers' Workshop

You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy

Latest Forum Posts

*Oct 2023: FORUM MIGRATION TIMELINE*
05/10/2023 07:57:11
Making ER11 collet chuck
05/10/2023 07:56:24
What did you do today? 2023
05/10/2023 07:25:01
Orrery
05/10/2023 06:00:41
Wera hand-tools
05/10/2023 05:47:07
New member
05/10/2023 04:40:11
Problems with external pot on at1 vfd
05/10/2023 00:06:32
Drain plug
04/10/2023 23:36:17
digi phase converter for 10 machines.....
04/10/2023 23:13:48
Winter Storage Of Locomotives
04/10/2023 21:02:11
More Latest Posts...
View All Topics

Support Our Partners

Shopping Partners

Subscription Offer

Latest "For Sale" Ads

Reeves** - Rebuilt Royal Scot by Martin Evans
by John Broughton
£300.00
BRITANNIA 5" GAUGE James Perrier
by Jon Seabright 1
£2,500.00
Drill Grinder - for restoration
by Nigel Graham 2
£0.00
WARCO WM18 MILLING MACHINE
by Alex Chudley
£1,200.00
MYFORD SUPER 7 LATHE
by Alex Chudley
£2,000.00
More "For Sale" Ads...

Latest "Wanted" Ads

D1-3 backplate
by Michael Horley
Price Not Specified
fixed steady for a Colchester bantam mark1 800
by George Jervis
Price Not Specified
lbsc pansy
by JACK SIDEBOTHAM
Price Not Specified
Pratt Burnerd multifit chuck key.
by Tim Riome
Price Not Specified
BANDSAW BLADE WELDER
by HUGH
Price Not Specified
More "Wanted" Ads...

Get In Touch!

Do you want to contact the Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop team?

You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.

Click THIS LINK for full contact details.

For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.

Digital Back Issues