...or why is life so difficult?
Kiwi Bloke | 26/11/2020 08:53:37 |
912 forum posts 3 photos | Has anyone got access to more detailed bearing specs than seems to be readily available off the 'net? I'm going slowly nuts trying to discover whether there is any difference between single-row, deep groove bearings type 99502H and 1623 2RS. They appear to be dimensionally identical (5/8" X 1 3/8" X 7/16" . 99502H appears in various sources to be a 'special agricultural bearing', but why, or how, it's 'special' isn't stated. Published material spec. seems similar, although 99502H seems to be made of Unobtainium here in NZ. Detailed seal design doesn't appear to be standardised across manufacturers. One might expect an ag bearing to have better muck-excluding seals, but is that the case? I'm faced with having to replace a couple of 99502H which have failed as a result of dust ingress (ultra-fine loess clay dust), so seal performance is important. Is this a case of manufacturers promoting illusory differences, or are there real differences - and, if so, what? If the bearings are in fact the same, why the different identification codes? [edited to remove stupid winking face thingy - when will this bug be fixed?] Edited By Kiwi Bloke on 26/11/2020 08:55:07 |
Ronald Morrison | 26/11/2020 09:53:39 |
98 forum posts 4 photos | Wild guess? Speed of operation. Most bearings in agricultural use are slow turning. Other bearings might need better quality as speed is much higher. Now you need to explain where the bearings are used. What kind of agricultural equipment and where on that equipment? |
Ady1 | 26/11/2020 10:05:47 |
![]() 6137 forum posts 893 photos | You're looking for detailed opinions/experiences and not really giving anyone much detail |
pgk pgk | 26/11/2020 10:21:41 |
2661 forum posts 294 photos | Digging about on google- One site Link suggests that they are an imperial bearing with a metric ID 11mm whereas 7/16ths works out as 11.11mm. In which case they aren't the same as 1623 2RS..???? pgk |
Emgee | 26/11/2020 10:31:34 |
2610 forum posts 312 photos | 99502H Bearing 16232RS Rubber Sealed Deep Groove Ball Bearing 0.625x1.375x0.4375 inch, almost the same description as above. Seems either will be suitable for your use but best to have spares in stock to replace as required, a similar type of use in an agressive environment was discussed in this forum some time ago. Emgee
|
Hopper | 26/11/2020 10:46:56 |
![]() 7881 forum posts 397 photos | It's in the suffixes. XXXX2H indicates the inner and outer races are made from a special high temperature tool steel. XXXXX2RS indicates its a both-sides rubber sealed bearing, of the standard type. So your original would be a heavy duty bearing for higher temp operation, such as heavy load without recirculating oil lubrication etc. to keep temperature down. Chart here has all the standard codes: **LINK** 2H is way way down the bottom. |
David Jupp | 26/11/2020 11:27:14 |
978 forum posts 26 photos | 99502H Sealed Deep Groove Ball Bearing with Special Bore 5/8"x35mmx11mm
So not quite identical sizes. Edited By David Jupp on 26/11/2020 11:27:29 |
Hopper | 26/11/2020 11:46:34 |
![]() 7881 forum posts 397 photos | Imperial. That might be why it's "unobtainium" in New Zealand then. Those imperial sizes are going that way. Seems to be plenty of them on US lawnmower parts websites though. |
JasonB | 26/11/2020 11:52:00 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | Some sites show the 99502H as all imperial rather than just the 5/8 bore so be careful what you need. |
Michael Gilligan | 26/11/2020 12:14:10 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Kiwi Bloke on 26/11/2020 08:53:37:
[…] [edited to remove stupid winking face thingy - when will this bug be fixed?] Edited By Kiwi Bloke on 26/11/2020 08:55:07 . Now that the big question is answered ... may I just address your edit ? It is not a bug ... it is an optional feature in the forum software, which can be activated or de-activated by a logical switch. Our problem is that MTM elects to have this ‘convenient feature’ active.
MichaelG. |
DC31k | 26/11/2020 17:56:51 |
1186 forum posts 11 photos | Posted by Hopper on 26/11/2020 10:46:56:
It's in the suffixes. XXXX2H indicates the inner and outer races are made from a special high temperature tool steel. XXXXX2RS indicates its a both-sides rubber sealed bearing, of the standard type. So your original would be a heavy duty bearing for higher temp operation, such as heavy load without recirculating oil lubrication etc. to keep temperature down. The suffix is only true if the XXXX in both cases is in the same language. In the case of the bearing under discussion, 99502 is not an ISO designation (I have failed to determine to which, if any, naming standard it does belong), whereas 1632 is ISO and the chart to which you link is specifically for NTN bearings*. Other references, and indeed the original poster, refer to it as an agricultural bearing. Many of the listed applications are ride-on mowers, hardly an application for high temperature tool steel. (https://bearingsdirect.com/agricultural-ball-bearings/99502h-agricultural-ball-bearing-5-8x1-3-8x7-16-sealed-sc0228lu) It is interesting that some of the descriptions of the 99502 bearing market themselves as being made from a special chrome tool steel, which, when you check the standard mentioned (SAE-52100) is a standard bearing steel. The snake oil is marketing this bearing to mower people is probably the same as that marketing gold plated plugs to hifi people. * I particularly want to buy a C2 bearing off them, to check it the table is correct. |
J Hancock | 26/11/2020 18:08:26 |
869 forum posts | Lip seals won't last long in that situation. Any chance of putting an automatic greaser into the bearing housing via the grease point, or an air bleed ? Anything to keep the clay dust out. |
Kiwi Bloke | 27/11/2020 10:27:39 |
912 forum posts 3 photos | Well, thanks for trying to help, folks, but the mystery remains. The bearing manufacturers and suppliers publish information on the 'net, but don't provide enlightenment. Both types seem to be chrome-steel construction, and have the same imperial major dimensions, but some sources translate imperial into metric, with variable rounding or truncation, or are quote correct to the nearest micron. Impressive precision, but, of course, illusory - the work of someone who knows not what they are doing. I've even seen one of these described as a 6202 (a standard metric size: 15 X 35 X 11 mm), but with a 5/8" bore. I still want to know what the difference is - if any! |
Hopper | 27/11/2020 10:42:31 |
![]() 7881 forum posts 397 photos | All you can do really is order a couple with the same number as what you have, off one of the many websites supplying them for lawn mowers and fit them to your machine. They cost a whole $3.70 each on some of those sites and seem to be as common as muck. Chinese sites will probably ship for free but the US ones probably want the usual $60 minimum. |
Ronald Morrison | 27/11/2020 11:08:49 |
98 forum posts 4 photos | if you spend enough time on bearing manufacturers websites trying to sort out the terminology the use so you can compare the various bearings between suppliers you will become more confused and frustrated. Unless the bearing is a very special application that requires high precision and high speed operation, just measure the ID, OD, and width and pick a bearing. If the lip seals won't keep the dust out, nothing will. Greasing the bearing won't be of much help as you can't push out all the dust that is in the bearing but simply dilute the grease/dust mix that is in there. Hopefully the location of the bearing will make for easy replacement. Buy 2 or more and store the spares where you can find them. |
Andy_G | 27/11/2020 14:18:07 |
![]() 260 forum posts | Posted by Kiwi Bloke on 27/11/2020 10:27:39:
I still want to know what the difference is - if any! The 99502H seems to have imperial ID & OD, but metric width: This lists both (pdf file) 99502H ID 0.6250" / 15.875mm OD 1.375" / 34.925mm Width 0.4331" / 11mm 1623 ID 0.6250" OD 1.375" Width 0.4375" (7/16" ) = (11.113 mm) Edited By Andy Gray 3 on 27/11/2020 14:18:53 |
mark costello 1 | 27/11/2020 20:35:42 |
![]() 800 forum posts 16 photos | As a hint for All Who grace this forum, I have a dollup of advice to add. It's best not to order bearings by number alone. I work with a Friend Who worked the Customer counter at a Bearing house for years and He agrees with My experience. Some bearings are stock sizes used for customization. A 6202 bearing can have the OD or ID changed to make it a different size and They WILL NOT change the numbers on the bearing. It's best to measure every dimension to see if it agrees with Your expectations. |
Bill Dawes | 27/11/2020 20:56:29 |
605 forum posts | I thought the last two digits gave an indication of the od. eg a 6202, 6203, 6205 etc would be the same bore but bigger od as far as I know. Have a look at the SKF website if you have a strong constitution, bearing manufacturers world wide use similar codes for standard bearings at least. (ISO I believe) 'Specials' are likely to be ones made for a specific customer, what we call a special is probably in their 'standard' catalogue range but not off the shelf. I do not work for a bearing manufacurer but have used a lot over the years in my industry of industrial fan engineering. Good luck Bill D. |
RMA | 27/11/2020 21:20:40 |
332 forum posts 4 photos | Posted by Kiwi Bloke on 26/11/2020 08:53:37:
Has anyone got access to more detailed bearing specs than seems to be readily available off the 'net? I'm going slowly nuts trying to discover whether there is any difference between single-row, deep groove bearings type 99502H and 1623 2RS. They appear to be dimensionally identical (5/8" X 1 3/8" X 7/16" . 99502H appears in various sources to be a 'special agricultural bearing', but why, or how, it's 'special' isn't stated. Published material spec. seems similar, although 99502H seems to be made of Unobtainium here in NZ. Detailed seal design doesn't appear to be standardised across manufacturers. One might expect an ag bearing to have better muck-excluding seals, but is that the case? I'm faced with having to replace a couple of 99502H which have failed as a result of dust ingress (ultra-fine loess clay dust), so seal performance is important. Is this a case of manufacturers promoting illusory differences, or are there real differences - and, if so, what? If the bearings are in fact the same, why the different identification codes? [edited to remove stupid winking face thingy - when will this bug be fixed?] Edited By Kiwi Bloke on 26/11/2020 08:55:07 I can't help you with the specs of the bearings, but it would appear that the premature failure is due to poor seals and I would suggest putting an additional seal to prevent the dust getting to the normal seal. A seal to protect a seal in effect. Many years ago when I worked for Timken Bearings we specified metal seals which cut into the edge of the bearing. I can't remember the trade name now but they were very thin, so didn't take up much room in the assembly. They proved very effective in hostile environments. Having done a quick search I found Nilos rings, which appear to do the same thing. I hope that has been of some help. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.