Full size digital download
This useful and well-designed Tailstock Turret by Alex du Pre accompanied issue 253 of Model Engineers' Workshop. Subscribers Only
Neil Wyatt | 15/03/2017 16:45:36 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Because Digital-Only subscribers may have difficulty accessing and viewing such a large plan, we have made it available as a PDF through the subscriber-only article linked here. www.model-engineer.co.uk/news/article/free-plan-for-subscribers-to-accompany-mew-253 Please note you must have a valid subscriber number entered in your profile to view the article and download the plan. Purchasers & subscribers of papers magazines will get the full size paper version. Paper subscribers may also download the electronic version from the above link. Please respect our copyright and do not circulate the plan to others. Neil |
Journeyman | 15/03/2017 16:57:07 |
![]() 1257 forum posts 264 photos | Downloaded the PDF nice design unfortunately not much good for my lathe as no hole through the tailstock for a draw-bar. Would it work just relying on friction to keep it in place? Any other cunning retention plan? John |
John Stevenson | 15/03/2017 16:57:08 |
![]() 5068 forum posts 3 photos | Neil, First page reads Issue 2653 and not 253. Thank you for the plans. |
Michael Gilligan | 15/03/2017 16:57:51 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Isn't WiFi 'bus technology wonderful ... I'm on the 'bus going home from Manchester, and have just downloaded the plan in about fifteen seconds, and saved it to GoodReader on the iPad. Thanks, Neil MichaelG. |
Michael Gilligan | 15/03/2017 17:00:38 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Journeyman on 15/03/2017 16:57:07: ... Any other cunning retention plan? . 638 Loctite MichaelG. |
Journeyman | 15/03/2017 17:04:05 |
![]() 1257 forum posts 264 photos | Michael, Ah yes but a trifle permanent if you need to use the tailstock for something else |
John Stevenson | 15/03/2017 17:13:07 |
![]() 5068 forum posts 3 photos | I already have a couple of these but commercial units and they just stay in by the grip of the Morse taper. I can't fit a drawbar either so I cannot see any problem with this design at all.
End of the day bearing in mind we have the drawings only, you drill and ream the holes in the turret from the headstock so you guarantee alignment. |
Neil Wyatt | 15/03/2017 17:54:01 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | If you think about it, the loads are no different than on tooling held direct in the tailstock. My lathe hasn't got a drawbar hole either. Neil <edit> Actually the Adept has got a drawbar hole, which I suppose underlines its superiority Or perhaps it's where you thread the anchor rope. Edited By Neil Wyatt on 15/03/2017 17:55:13 |
John Stevenson | 15/03/2017 17:59:34 |
![]() 5068 forum posts 3 photos | Posted by Neil Wyatt on 15/03/2017 17:54:01:
<edit> Actually the Adept has got a drawbar hole, which I suppose underlines its superiority Or perhaps it's where you thread the anchor rope. Edited By Neil Wyatt on 15/03/2017 17:55:13 .
LOL. |
Journeyman | 15/03/2017 18:12:39 |
![]() 1257 forum posts 264 photos | Posted by John Stevenson on 15/03/2017 17:13:07:
I already have a couple of these but commercial units and they just stay in by the grip of the Morse taper. I can't fit a drawbar either so I cannot see any problem with this design at all. Thats alright then, might give it a go once I have read the article. John |
JasonB | 15/03/2017 18:26:39 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | That has worked out quite well as a PDF, better than having "fold" lines where you don't want them has it been done on digital. Even though A2 it is easy enough to zoom and scroll to the part you want and print "actual view" and get it on bits of A4. Also does not get pixilated when you zoom in like it would as a mag page.
J PS. Now you just need to work out a way to cut and past that 252 red triangle |
Neil Wyatt | 15/03/2017 18:53:59 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | |
Mark Rand | 23/03/2017 00:12:06 |
1505 forum posts 56 photos | Just noticed that the (printed) drawing shows an M12 thread for the MT2 arbor and angle piece that it attaches to, whereas the article text quotes M10 for both.
Not near a measuring stick at the moment so haven't attempted to scale from the drawing. |
mgnbuk | 23/03/2017 08:31:46 |
1394 forum posts 103 photos | I cannot see any problem with this design at all There are a couple of points that don't seem great to me : The index pin is parallel - this will have some play when new & will wear looser. Commercial designs use a tapered pin to take up wear ? The angled block is located with countersunk screws only - better to have made the angled block with a bigger footprint & use pins for location, or to have fitted the block into a closely machined recess in the back of the body ? Unless using fitted bolts to give a location and fastening in one, isn't it usual to use fasteners to hold things together and pins, tenons, spigots etc, to give a positive location ? Nigel B |
JasonB | 23/03/2017 08:59:45 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | Posted by John Stevenson on 15/03/2017 17:13:07:
I can't fit a drawbar either so I cannot see any problem with this design at all. Quoted out of context, John was refering to retaining the tool by the MT alone not the whole design. |
Gary Wooding | 23/03/2017 10:02:48 |
1074 forum posts 290 photos | I got 4 copies of the plans with my subscription. |
John Flack | 23/03/2017 10:30:49 |
171 forum posts | As no more than an amateur, whose lathe is no more than modelling eqpt, with no intention of professional usage, thus my time is free. Purchasing several tail stock chucks and inserting tooling for sequential use seems a simpler solution. No doubt the great and the good will inform this sinner otherwise. But it works for me |
Neil Wyatt | 23/03/2017 11:09:02 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Posted by John Flack on 23/03/2017 10:30:49:
As no more than an amateur, whose lathe is no more than modelling eqpt, with no intention of professional usage, thus my time is free. Purchasing several tail stock chucks and inserting tooling for sequential use seems a simpler solution. No doubt the great and the good will inform this sinner otherwise. But it works for me It won't suit everyone, the more operations and the more parts you need to do, the more useful it becomes. Obviously when you get to a certain point you might then think of moving up to a capstan lathe, and beyond that an automatic or CNC. If you don't do a lot of repetitive work and have plenty of time, it's not for you. Neil |
Neil Wyatt | 23/03/2017 11:09:29 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Posted by Gary Wooding on 23/03/2017 10:02:48:
I got 4 copies of the plans with my subscription. Will you be returning them or shall I send you and invoice? Neil |
Flying Fifer | 23/03/2017 15:53:11 |
180 forum posts | Neil, I`m struggling to make the detent assembly from the detail parts shown on the drawing. Can you also tell me what the purpose of the "finger" and the "flag" please. Regards, Puzzled Essex |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.