By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
Forum sponsored by:
Forum sponsored by Forum House Ad Zone

Not a "modeller"!

All Topics | Latest Posts

Search for:  in Thread Title in  
Russell Eberhardt27/08/2014 10:12:44
avatar
2785 forum posts
87 photos

Posted by Neil Wyatt on 26/08/2014 21:51:18:

As for the increasing breadth of content? The publishers have specifically asked me to include more content of relevance to the wider readership of the magazine which goes far beyond model engineers to car restorers, light engineering companies and 'makers' etc. I am hoping to do this in a way that doesn't alienate existing readers.

Quite right too.

Keep up the good work Neil.

Russell.

Neil Wyatt27/08/2014 11:28:22
avatar
19226 forum posts
749 photos
86 articles

The stuff about professional engineers and chartered status may seem irelevant, but I'm a bit of a sucker for the magazine's heritage.

It's interesting to look at not just the old titles, but also a few of the old straplines, which are, in a sense, 'mission statements' for the titles:

  • The Model Engineer and Amateur Electrician. A journal of mechanics and electricity for amateurs and students.
  • The Model Engineer. A journal of small power engineering.
  • Model Engineer. The Magazine for the mechanically minded.

A journal of mechanics and electricity for amateurs and students.

These days the word 'amateur' has become rather undervalued, take the word 'amateurish'.

In the past 'amateur' was not a dirty word. There was even a degree of 'snobbery' attached to it as an amateur did things for the love of it, while a 'professional' was paid. In sports gentlemen were the 'amateurs'.

So if we want to look at the term 'model engineer' from a 1999 perspective, the distinction between the 'amateur engineers' the magazine was aimed at and 'professional engineers' becomes a very simple and clear one.

In comparison, MEW has almost always been 'the practical hobby magazine' which suggests an enormously wide remit!

Neil

P.S. The general public have a very vague understanding, if any, of what 'chartered status' is, but Chartered Engineers have a much better deal than some professions...

Ian S C27/08/2014 11:53:51
avatar
7468 forum posts
230 photos

Don't know, but I think I must be a model engineer, a good many years ago I answered an add in ME, and received a little round badge, it's blue and gold, with a micrometre on it, and the letters I, ME, the mic forming a G, International Guild of Model Engineers. I don't mind wearing it when I'm displaying my Hot Air Engines, they are not models, just small hot air engines. Even the Stuart Turner is not a model, but a small steam engine. But if Percival Marshall thought it was OK, so be it, people told him the magazine wouldn't last more than a year or two.

Ian S C

Martin Kyte27/08/2014 12:28:53
avatar
3445 forum posts
62 photos

Niel

In my book the opposite of Amateur is Mercenary. The one does it for the love the other for the money. Similarly the opposite of Professional should be Incompetent.

Martin

Russell Eberhardt27/08/2014 13:53:52
avatar
2785 forum posts
87 photos
Posted by Martin Kyte on 27/08/2014 12:28:53:
The one does it for the love the other for the money.

Not necessariliy. I was an amateur engineer when at school. I then studied and trained to become a professional engineer because I was hooked on engineering. I could have made much more money in accounting or law with easier qualifications so I didn't do it for the money.

Russell.

Martin Kyte27/08/2014 14:06:19
avatar
3445 forum posts
62 photos

Exactly, if you did it for the money you would be a mercenary professional.

If your motivation was love of engineering you would be an amateur professional who got paid as well.

When you were at school you were an amateur tyro-engineer.

Martin

Neil Wyatt27/08/2014 15:46:55
avatar
19226 forum posts
749 photos
86 articles

Those look like Humpty-Dumpty definitions to me...

Neil

Martin Kyte27/08/2014 16:32:49
avatar
3445 forum posts
62 photos

I'm just trying to illustrate that professional relates to competence and amateur relates to motivation in a light-hearted way.

Martin

Neil Wyatt27/08/2014 17:01:36
avatar
19226 forum posts
749 photos
86 articles

I was being light hearted too- Humpty Dumpty: "When I use a word it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less."

Neil

Hopper01/09/2014 01:40:54
avatar
7881 forum posts
397 photos

"Engineering: Combining art & science to create artifacts from dreams"

(Henry Petroski)

Sounds like what we do, dunnit?

Bill Pudney01/09/2014 06:18:23
622 forum posts
24 photos

This is all taking semantics and pedantry to a new high level. I'm not a bit surprised at the playing with words and the pedantry, but it is highly entertaining.

cheers

Bill

Edited By Bill Pudney on 01/09/2014 06:18:54

Oompa Lumpa01/09/2014 08:27:49
888 forum posts
36 photos

When I read or hear the comparisons between Professional/Amateur it always brings to mind a "Which?" report I read many years ago comparing Computer Operating Systems. You have to first grasp that the report was for the 'general public' to make a decision about which operating system and therefore which type of computer it was they would look to purchase.

The list went on, Sun Solaris the type of application it was used and who would use it, the Mac OS, type of application and so on, MS Dos... And when we finally reached Linux the description said something like: "Only really suitable for the Amateur Hobbyist or Serious Professional user."

Says it all really and has been a sort of yardstick for me ever since. I really wish I had kept that article.

graham.

Edited By Oompa Lumpa on 01/09/2014 08:29:09

Russell Eberhardt01/09/2014 10:15:09
avatar
2785 forum posts
87 photos

Don't let's get started on operating systems - they are even more contentiousdevil

Russell.

Ian P01/09/2014 10:48:05
avatar
2747 forum posts
123 photos
Posted by Russell Eberhardt on 01/09/2014 10:15:09:

Don't let's get started on operating systems - they are even more contentiousdevil

Russell.

I don't think Graham was bringing operating systems into the discussion. He just used it as an example of the Am/Pro definition.

Its all rubbish really, we can argue/discuss till the cows come home but we wont be able to reach a consensus that applies to all fields of activity.

Ian

John Stevenson01/09/2014 10:53:05
avatar
5068 forum posts
3 photos

Yabut you have to agree that whinging and whining is far better than cutting any metal isn't it ?

Must be or there would be less of it and more show and tell posts.

The local hospitals have some fluid for parting fingers etc when stuck together with superglue, wonder if they have something for getting moleskin trousers unwelded from armchairs ?

Chris Trice01/09/2014 11:24:06
avatar
1376 forum posts
10 photos

I used to restore Triumph Sportscars professionally for nearly ten years. I should've charged myself when working on my own car because otherwise, I would never have let an incompetent loose on it. Under no circumstances let any friends or family do things for you for free because you'll also get an incompetent doing the work.

What a dumb definition.

I'm sure we all have many examples where people charging for services in no way makes them competent to do the job they're doing.

Edited By Chris Trice on 01/09/2014 11:25:36

JA01/09/2014 11:53:32
avatar
1605 forum posts
83 photos

When things go wrong:

  • Amateur (or favour at work) = not legal complaints system = possible dissatisfaction but no loss of money.
  • Professional = receipt = recourse to law = possible satisfaction which could cost a lot of money.

You take your choice, simple.

JA

Chris Trice01/09/2014 12:19:46
avatar
1376 forum posts
10 photos

The definition of competent is not defined by the ability to sue and in nearly all cases, you can sue an individual whether they charged or not if it led to damage.

Edited By Chris Trice on 01/09/2014 12:20:21

Ian P01/09/2014 13:38:30
avatar
2747 forum posts
123 photos
Posted by Chris Trice on 01/09/2014 11:24:06:

I used to restore Triumph Sportscars professionally for nearly ten years. I should've charged myself when working on my own car because otherwise, I would never have let an incompetent loose on it. Under no circumstances let any friends or family do things for you for free because you'll also get an incompetent doing the work.

What a dumb definition.

I'm sure we all have many examples where people charging for services in no way makes them competent to do the job they're doing.

Edited By Chris Trice on 01/09/2014 11:25:36

I'm not sure which part of your posting was a quote or whether the dumb definition is your own? either way I am left confused!

Ian P

Thomas Gude01/09/2014 14:08:13
106 forum posts
26 photos

Way TL;DR!! I don't think I'm gunna return to this site any time soon. Bunch of bickering nit pickers.

(sorry forgot the hyphen: nit-pickers)

All Topics | Latest Posts

Please login to post a reply.

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!

Find Model Engineer & Model Engineers' Workshop

Sign up to our Newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.

You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
cowells
Sarik
MERIDIENNE EXHIBITIONS LTD
Subscription Offer

Latest "For Sale" Ads
Latest "Wanted" Ads
Get In Touch!

Do you want to contact the Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop team?

You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.

Click THIS LINK for full contact details.

For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.

Digital Back Issues

Social Media online

'Like' us on Facebook
Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter
 Twitter Logo

Pin us on Pinterest

 

Donate

donate