David Clark 1 | 18/01/2013 14:25:30 |
![]() 3357 forum posts 112 photos 10 articles | Hi Blowlamp Yes, I don't want to take the chance. I am struggling to post as the internet is playing up so please excuse me if I can't reply immediately. regards David
Edited By David Clark 1 on 18/01/2013 14:25:49 |
Packmule | 18/01/2013 14:49:17 |
133 forum posts 6 photos | World's gone mad. We can't have a blackboard but you can have a whiteboard ? etc stop the world I want to get off . Black is black just as white will always be white |
MadMike | 18/01/2013 16:08:02 |
265 forum posts 4 photos | As a ocassional poster on here my view is simply that the Moderators rules are the Moderators rules. He makes them and we comply. David if you feel that the sort of comments you have described are not acceptable ten that is really the end to it. At least you have made a positive decision and for that I applaud you. |
Stub Mandrel | 18/01/2013 17:59:42 |
![]() 4318 forum posts 291 photos 1 articles | I don't know the details but I if I'm right I CAN understand why David is sensitive about this. There are some folks who would be delighted to get an opportunity to sling mud. Neil |
Sandy Morton | 18/01/2013 20:09:53 |
104 forum posts | David I feel that any posts about the weather by people who have local knowledge are very helpful. I live about 400 miles away to the north, where we have no snow, but I would be very unhappy if I tried to travel to London and found that there were insurmountable problems. I therefore appreciate all the local posts and I have also phoned my sister in law who lives at the bottom of the hill below AllyPally. |
NJH | 18/01/2013 21:40:55 |
![]() 2314 forum posts 139 photos | This forum is the "property" of the owners of Model Engineer. The Present London exhibition is associated with the other regular model engineering publication. I can appreciate good reason for not posting comments about a competitors event whilst it is in progress - comments that might affect that competitors business. We should remember that we do not "own" this forum and this small restriction is, to my mind, a small inconvenience to pay for a great facility. I'm more than happy to accept David's judgement in this matter Regards Norman Edited By NJH on 18/01/2013 21:42:44 |
David Clark 1 | 18/01/2013 21:46:45 |
![]() 3357 forum posts 112 photos 10 articles | Hi Norman Exactly right. regards David |
Robert Dodds | 18/01/2013 21:58:25 |
324 forum posts 63 photos | Don't blame Carol Kirkwood, she tells it like it is!
The Beeb's Breakfast told me more though, It was all tabletop railways, plastic helicopters and R/C trucks- not a machine tool in sight. Bob D |
Steve Withnell | 18/01/2013 22:51:15 |
![]() 858 forum posts 215 photos | All posts on this forum are branded "Model Engineer". It's Model Engineer sponsored. POsts here are effectively "Letters to the editor'. David's the editor. That's it.
There are loads of other forums which are not "sponsored" and some not moderated. They are all free.
|
jason udall | 19/01/2013 00:05:45 |
2032 forum posts 41 photos |
Posted by Stub Mandrel on 18/01/2013 17:59:42:
I don't know the details but I if I'm right I CAN understand why David is sensitive about this. There are some folks who would be delighted to get an opportunity to sling mud. Neil I think I too remember..last year I think...But I support DC1 in this...his action and the reason behind it say something about the editors of the respected magazines.....nuff said.
|
Chris Trice | 19/01/2013 01:37:14 |
![]() 1376 forum posts 10 photos | What NJH said. No one is entitled to free speech in a forum. We are all guests of the forum host. The host can legislate as he likes. If you go to a friends house and he deems you are annoying his neighbours, whether you are or not, he's entitled to ask you to stop. Whether there is a legal case to answer or not is probably a good debating point but it makes no difference if David wants to pull the plug on a thread. I always used to get narked as a kid when I got pulled in by my mother when there was trouble outside even if I was nothing to do with it. The fact is that it's often simpler for the parent to avoid the problem all together than debate the actions with the recalcitrant child. |
Springbok | 19/01/2013 06:45:07 |
![]() 879 forum posts 34 photos |
Hi gentlemen thanks Bob |
Nicholas Farr | 19/01/2013 08:48:34 |
![]() 3988 forum posts 1799 photos | Hi Bob, if you have a copy of the March 2012 EIM, read the editorial, as I believe there is a clue under the second heading. I didn't see the postings before the moderation, but I guess they may have been in a similar vein. I do believe that David said last year that unwelcome comments made relating to this situation would be removed. Anyway I now off to the the Ally Pally to see an exhibition. Regards Nick. |
chris j | 19/01/2013 09:34:32 |
338 forum posts 17 photos |
Posted by Springbok on 19/01/2013 06:45:07:
Hi gentlemen thanks Bob
Hi Bob |
chris j | 19/01/2013 09:35:09 |
338 forum posts 17 photos |
Part 2
That was it !!
Next time I logged on David has posted "This thread has been Moderated" and so I posted "Why is that David". That post then got deleted. I guess there is a slim possibility that someone posted something offensive after me, but why not just delete that and allow us to discuss the travel situation. If I do go Sunday and get involved in a fender bender I may have to sue him for depriving me of a traffic warning ![]()
Chris
|
IanT | 19/01/2013 11:39:18 |
2147 forum posts 222 photos | Given the history from last year (yes, I do read the Editorials), I'm really not suprised that a little caution was exercised here. In Davids place, I would have done exactly the same. This is not censorship or a 'freedom of spech' issue or anything else - it's simply commercial caution. We live in an age of litigation, ambulance chasers and other blights that were unknown in this Country just 10-15 years ago. Fear of legal action is the reason many ME Society's have taken Limited Company status after all. There are many ways to check weaher conditions (Web, TV, Radio) - so I don't see this as a real problem for the Gentleman - but I'm sure MHS don't want any more agrevation in this area - so let's be a bit more understanding and get this Forum back to Model Engineering please. Regards, IanT |
chris j | 19/01/2013 11:44:41 |
338 forum posts 17 photos |
Posted by IanT on 19/01/2013 11:39:18:
Given the history from last year (yes, I do read the Editorials), I'm really not suprised that a little caution was exercised here. In Davids place, I would have done exactly the same. This is not censorship or a 'freedom of spech' issue or anything else - it's simply commercial caution. We live in an age of litigation, ambulance chasers and other blights that were unknown in this Country just 10-15 years ago. Fear of legal action is the reason many ME Society's have taken Limited Company status after all. There are many ways to check weaher conditions (Web, TV, Radio) - so I don't see this as a real problem for the Gentleman - but I'm sure MHS don't want any more agrevation in this area - so let's be a bit more understanding and get this Forum back to Model Engineering please. Regards, IanT Ian You may be correct in most of what you say but I can assure you that the best way of checking the weather situation at a specific place is to converse with someone who is actually there. Anyway I will withdraw having stated what happened to me for those interested. |
blowlamp | 19/01/2013 12:35:19 |
![]() 1885 forum posts 111 photos |
Posted by chris j on 19/01/2013 09:35:09
...If I do go Sunday and get involved in a fender bender I may have to sue him for depriving me of a traffic warning ![]()
Chris
That's one of the most valid comments so far. No one would ever sue this site because of peoples opinion of the weather and it's difficult to believe anything other than this 'moderation' being done for commercial reasons. There are advertisements on here that can influence a person away from one company towards another - so by this logic all the businesses that don't make a sale can sue DC1 when the public don't support them because DC1 allowed someone else's advert to exist here.
Martin. |
David Clark 1 | 19/01/2013 12:54:49 |
![]() 3357 forum posts 112 photos 10 articles | Hi There Any good comments about Alexander Palace will be approved. I have no wish to see this exhibition suffer. However, comments about the bad weather stopping someone from going or the car park might be dangerous will not be approved. regards David
|
blowlamp | 19/01/2013 13:06:51 |
![]() 1885 forum posts 111 photos |
Posted by David Clark 1 on 19/01/2013 12:54:49:
Hi There Any good comments about Alexander Palace will be approved. I have no wish to see this exhibition suffer. However, comments about the bad weather stopping someone from going or the car park might be dangerous will not be approved. regards David
I don't want anyone or any thing to suffer, but the idea that you would actively prevent us from having truthful information is not on. How is withholding the information you cite (above) helpful to us?
Martin. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.