sparky mike | 20/08/2012 07:43:40 |
259 forum posts 77 photos | What is the correct size for the shanks for Myford lathe turning tools. Does it vary per model? I am interested in Super 7 tools and wish to purchase a set of indexable type tools and don't want to buy the wrong size. (I can't measure the lathe as it is still in bits !!) Mike. |
Alain Faget | 20/08/2012 08:45:01 |
8 forum posts | Hi Mike, I use 5/16 shanks with the S7 (Dickson tool post). keep safe, Alain |
Roderick Jenkins | 20/08/2012 09:24:55 |
![]() 2376 forum posts 800 photos | Mike, 10mm or 3/8" tools are usually recommended but with a Dickson toolpost I have had problems in not being able to get the tip low enough. Buying indexible tools is a bit of a minefield, with metric or imperial equivalents being a bit nominal. Milling the base off a toughened tool, even a far east one, is no fun! Like Alain, I would go for 8mm or 5/16" to be on the safe side - they will be plenty stiff enough provided you do not have excessive overhang. HTH Rod |
JohnF | 20/08/2012 11:20:47 |
![]() 1243 forum posts 202 photos | Mike , I have had my S7 for nearly 40 years and use a dickson tool post, I would strongly recommend 3/8 or 10mm shanks. That is what I use and no problems with height, the stiffer the tool the better results you will get.. Also worth getting a couple of the Dickson "Piddington style" extended tool holders to use when supporting work with the tailstock centre. I also recently purchased a tipped parting tool but I do prefer the original Dickson one with Eclipse HSS tool bit --- mainly due to the excessive overhang created due to the design of the tipped one I purchased [Glanze] -- not knocking Glanze I think their other tools are very good and probably this design is OK on larger machines. Might re-jig it with a dedicated holder when I get round to it !!! |
David Littlewood | 20/08/2012 12:33:47 |
533 forum posts | Mike, This subject was discussed extensively in this thread*: In brief, you should have no trouble with 3/8" (9.5 mm) tool shanks. I find no problem with 10 mm ones, but the spare room below the holder is vanishingly small, and some people find they just can't quite get the tool low enough. David *This shows the benefits of choosing a useful informative title when you start a new thread! Edited By David Littlewood on 20/08/2012 12:37:32 |
JohnF | 20/08/2012 13:47:28 |
![]() 1243 forum posts 202 photos |
Posted by JohnF on 20/08/2012 11:20:47:
Mike , I have had my S7 for nearly 40 years and use a dickson tool post, I would strongly recommend 3/8 or 10mm shanks. That is what I use and no problems with height, the stiffer the tool the better results you will get.. Also worth getting a couple of the Dickson "Piddington style" extended tool holders to use when supporting work with the tailstock centre. I also recently purchased a tipped parting tool but I do prefer the original Dickson one with Eclipse HSS tool bit --- mainly due to the excessive overhang created due to the design of the tipped one I purchased [Glanze] -- not knocking Glanze I think their other tools are very good and probably this design is OK on larger machines. Might re-jig it with a dedicated holder when I get round to it !!! Another point to watch the original Myford / Dickson tool holders were 0.225 thick at the bottom most of the import clones are 6mm 0.236" and some are 0.250. Worth measuring before buying . Look at A & R Precision they have been making for Myford and the holders are top quality.
|
Roderick Jenkins | 20/08/2012 17:23:54 |
![]() 2376 forum posts 800 photos | Well, I have two SCLCR 10mm tools( left and right handed) that will not bring the tip low enough on a Myford Dickson toolpost with the original Myford Dickson holder on my S7. I guess it is to do with the the thickness of the tip and the way it sits in the holder - both tips are above the plane of the tool top surface. This would not be an issue with a ground 10mm/3/8" HSS tool. Rod |
sparky mike | 20/08/2012 18:15:40 |
259 forum posts 77 photos | Thanks for the help on this subject. I will now know what to buy. Mike. |
sparky mike | 26/08/2012 18:51:26 |
259 forum posts 77 photos | Well I am now totally confused !! Myford are selling lathe tools for the Super 7 and they list them with 1/2" shank. Is Myford wrong? Mike. |
blowlamp | 26/08/2012 18:59:07 |
![]() 1885 forum posts 111 photos |
Posted by sparky mike on 26/08/2012 18:51:26:
Well I am now totally confused !! Myford are selling lathe tools for the Super 7 and they list them with 1/2" shank. Is Myford wrong? Mike. You can use 1/2" shank tools, but not with a Dickson type of toolholder. They are commonly used with a Myford toolboat for setting to centre height.
Martin. |
Neil Greenaway | 26/08/2012 23:11:05 |
75 forum posts 3 photos | hi all, there was mention of A&R precision engineering quick change holders.I got 4 of them in an ebay auction and theyre great.I wouldnt mind more but havent seen them on sale since.Wondered if they still make them for general sale? Neil. |
Clive Foster | 26/08/2012 23:49:02 |
3630 forum posts 128 photos |
No point in using a Dickson, or other QC system, with indexable carbide tip tooling. If the set is of half decent or better quality the cutting edges will be at the same height over the shank base for all holders so the "easy" height setting of a QC system is wasted. Just make a suitable number of two slot blocks with the correct base thickness and load up. 3 piece screw'n glue construction from stock sizes material works fine, just make sure that the top is thick enough not to bend when the tools are clamped in. Make the block narrow enough that the bottom is fully supported by the top-slide. If you are feeling creative devise some sort of loosen and quick release for the top clamp nut but spinning off a few turns with a fixed handle on the nut is no great bother when it comes to swopping blocks. Do buy ISO standard tip holders to give a choice of readily available high quality tips. Some of the cheaper offerings take unique sizes and are, often, pretty pants at the cutting end of things to. Allegedly there are some sets out there for which replacement tips cannot be found at all. On a small machine Dickson and other QC systems can be an unmitigated nuisance. The side offset means the tool has to divine its support at considerable distance and the extra joints reduce the stiffness. None of the small machines has stiffness to spare at the best of times. The large block gets in the way too so excess tool overhang is often essential for tail-stock poppet clearance. Clive |
Springbok | 27/08/2012 05:01:35 |
![]() 879 forum posts 34 photos | Myford went bust 2 years ago. |
Rufus Roughcut | 27/08/2012 15:01:32 |
83 forum posts 20 photos | Hi Gents I'm currently running two ML10s both using Dixon quick change tool posts and 1/2", 3/8" 12mm and 10mm tools of index and cobalt steels I simply skimmed the topslides under the tool post and solved all tooling issues in one go, although I could have skimmed a small section under tool holders at 45º to save on topslide metals.
Springbok Myford is now under RDG Tools ownership
|
David Clark 1 | 27/08/2012 20:12:40 |
![]() 3357 forum posts 112 photos 10 articles | Hi There Just before they went under, Myford were considering a new top slide for the ML10. The tool post stud was going to be offset so that the quick change tool posts would miss the top slide. regards david |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.