Forum sponsored by:
What lathe to get?
Just would like some advise on lathes you have/use and why you recommend them.
Articles
| Romeo R.L | 11/02/2012 15:03:08 |
 17 forum posts 3 photos |
Hello Everyone,
I was just wondering what lathes you use, and what you would recommend if you were buying a lathe.
I am thinking of building 7 1/4" loco''s steam and others, also 5 inch.
I have narrowed it down size wise:
-Harrison M300 / T300
-Colchester Bantam (old one as they are cheaper)
-Boxford sts 10.20
-Myford ML7
I have heard high regard for all of these lathes branding, i have the facility of club lathes but i need to get my own workshop to actually finish something.
So give me your thoughts on what lathe i should look for, preferably i am looking for a metric one aswell.
Regards,
Romeo
Edited By Romeo R.L on 11/02/2012 15:14:03 |
| JasonB | 11/02/2012 17:07:04 |
 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | You don't make any mention of what you will be doing for milling in your workshop, if you intend to use the lathe to do the milling as well then the Myford is the best bet.
M300 may be a bit big but a Bantam preferably a later 1600 or 2000 or the similar sized M250 would be a good machine.
J |
| Roderick Jenkins | 11/02/2012 17:40:54 |
 2376 forum posts 800 photos | Romeo, The Myford evolved into the ideal lathe for model engineering, the slotted cross slide and speed range together with the variety of attachments that have been designed for it make it hard to beat in my humble opinion. However, the size is probably a bit restricted for 7 1/4" locos but if you have occasional access to larger lathes then this might not be an issue. As your brand list suggests you wish to buy a 2nd hand British machine then I guess the question is really, why would I not buy a Myford? You do realise that you have started a religous discussion here, don't you?  cheers, Rod |
| David Littlewood | 11/02/2012 19:32:28 |
| 533 forum posts | Romeo,
I am in the fortunate position of having both a Myford Super 7B (30 years) and a Harrison M300 (4 years) so I am in a good position to compare them.
The M300 has a 6.5" centre height, power cross feed, metric and imperial screwcutting in the same gearbox, and (often overlooked but extremely useful) a headstock bore of 38mm compared with the puny 5/8" or so of the Myford. The latter means that if I want to make a part from a small length of say 1.5" MS, I can just chuck a whole length, do the turning, and then part off, without generating a load of offcuts too small to be useful. Obviously, the M300 can do a whole lot of larger jobs impossible on the Myford.
Having said that, the Myford is generally more pleasant to use; the various carriages and handwheels are much lighter in action and closer to hand, and generally I much prefer to use it for the majority of jobs provided they are within its scope. (The fact that it is in a workshop inside the house whereas the M300 is in an attached garage with only a little background heating for rust prevention may have something to do with that.)
One thing I have done to both machines is to fit VFDs, and this also makes them much more flexible to use; the ability to increase speed on the fly during a large facing job is very advantageous. Obviously the M300 comes with a 3-phase motor, so you would have to fit some form of 3-phase conversion if you chose that option, and I would say a VFD is far and away the best.
Most M300s I see for sale are cosmetically a little challenged, but if it is mechanically sound this should not put you off. They do weight over 680 kg though, so unlike the Myford it is not an easy job to move it around.
The Yahoo Harrison Lathe group is a very useful source of advice, if you choose to get one.
David |
| Ady1 | 11/02/2012 20:06:17 |
 6137 forum posts 893 photos | I'd stick with the old school stuff Got a drummond/Myford M series but those boxfords and colchesters look the biz Imperial/metric is irrelevant, DRO eliminates these issues, DRO also eliminates backlash issues. All the old names...now long gone...God bless 'em...would have used DRO IMHO The old stuff was built to do amateur AND professional work. |
| mgnbuk | 12/02/2012 10:58:14 |
| 1394 forum posts 103 photos | DRO also eliminates backlash issues. No it doesn't - the backlash and many of it's effects are still present. "All" the DRO will do is allow positioning to be set independant of any wear or backlash that may be present in the leadscrew. Which lathe ? Looking for a machine of M300 size I'd buy a new Warco / Chester Chinese machine - belt drive or geared according to pocket depth. Reports on these machine suggest reasonable build quality & good accuracy. The come fully equiped with chucks & steadies - ready to run "out of the box". Any "issues" - they are covered with a warranty. If you were to splash out a 3 times or more greater sum on a new M250 or M300 you would still be getting an imported machine, as the manual Harrisons have not been made here for many years. FWIW I didn't like using an M300 - the one we had at the last employment (which was a mint ex-model engineer's machine, never used in industry before we got it) had a restricted speed range & the dual reading dials on cross-slide & top slide robbed them of "feel". The well-worn Harrison 140 it replaced was a nicer machine to use. I have no experience of "small" Colchesters - a long bed Mastiff at work was nothing special, though. And a former supplier was less than impressed to find his new "Colchester" was actually a Colchester-badged TOS at a premium price. An ex-education Boxford might be a reasonable bet - if you can find a later style one (they do not appear to be thick on the ground !). I would not discount an earlier Boxford if you could find a good one - though the CUD I started with was plagued with belt slip problems on the awful link belt final drive demanded of passing the belt through the bed casting. An ME10 or VSL-L00 would be my preference (though the VSL still has the link belt). Emco Maximats (V10, V11) have always looked good to me, but seem to come up rarely. When Mercer Bros. in Cleckheaton were still with us (much missed), I regularly hankered after the new V11 they had is stock. Way outside my budget, unfortunately. A Super 7 does most of what I require - the spindle bore restriction being my only real gripe. I do have the ability to take any larger stuff I may want to do in to work, though (up to a metre diameter chucked, or 600 dia x 3.5metres between centres if required !). £0.02 Nigel B. Edited By Nigel Barraclough on 12/02/2012 11:26:24 |
| KWIL | 12/02/2012 11:14:57 |
| 3681 forum posts 70 photos | Like David I have both Harrison M300 and Myford S7 (and a ML7). It is horses for courses really. If you have only the space for 1 and it is mainly model engineering, then the Myford S7 for all the reasons stated. On 71/4" gauge, probably only the drivers will be a problem (9"+) although I have machined drivers on the Myford, they are a bit tight in the gap and on a faceplate. Whichever one you choose, go down the VFD route if you can. |
| Ian S C | 12/02/2012 11:35:26 |
 7468 forum posts 230 photos | Whats wrong with link belts? Ian S C |
| mgnbuk | 12/02/2012 12:20:11 |
| 1394 forum posts 103 photos | Whats wrong with link belts? Great at slipping - not so good at driving ! Even when bow-string tight. May be down to the modern, slippery plastic link material - the original belts were more of a canvas-like construction. Had similar problems on a grinder project at the last employment, where link belts were recommended for smooth running. Yes, they ran smoothly, but the spindle stopped when a load was applied ! I have, once, seen a Vee belt that could be split. It had a series of holes perpendicular to the driving axis & was joined with short steel link plates (placed inside & outside the belt) screwed together through the holes. I was unable to track down a supplier, unfortuately. |
| _Paul_ | 12/02/2012 13:27:53 |
 543 forum posts 31 photos | Something with a gearbox is much better that having to sort out changegears to alter screwcutting pitches/fine feeds. Power crossfeed nice to have also. Variable speed a machine fitted with a 3 phase motor running off an inverter will give you all the control you need. Personally I would suggest a Boxford "A" or "AUD" (imperial) should do pretty much anything you want, I see Ebay has some currently advertised there are normally one or two on Homeworkshop too. Or (more expensive) a Myford Super 7 with power crossfeed. Both machines are not incredibly heavy to move around and can be part stripped relatively easily for transportation. Regards Paul |
| David Littlewood | 12/02/2012 13:35:44 |
| 533 forum posts | Nigel,
You have a point about the feel of the M300 - indeed I made a similar reference above - but I take issue with your claim that it has a limited speed range. Mine - and I assume they are all the same - has marked speeds on the speed selector of 40 - 2500 rpm; with the VFD, the lowest setting gives about a 4 rpm speed, and since VFDs typically give a 10 -20% increase at their maximum it probably goes up to 2750 - 3000 rpm, at which point it gets quite scary and you have to check the maximum permitted speed for your chucks. What more do you want?
I did seriously consider getting a Warco geared head machine of about the same paper spec and price, and I'm still not sure why I went the way I did. One factor (not too important to me, might be to my heirs) is that a Warco 6.5" lathe will lose over half its value the moment you buy it; a good second hand European lathe of the period when lathes were actually made here will have done all its depreciation and should still be worth a large fraction of what you paid for it.
David |
| mgnbuk | 12/02/2012 14:00:54 |
| 1394 forum posts 103 photos | I take issue with your claim that it has a limited speed range No VFD on the ex-work one, but IIRC it only had 8 speeds & wide variations between them ? I no longer have access to the machine (so cannot check to be certain) but I do recall having to run faster or slower that I wanted to on occasions. (A quick Googling says 12 speeds, 40-2500 rpm, but "our" machine has been modified by it's original model engineer owner to run more slowly. 28 - 1750 rings a bell but, as above, I can no longer check for certain). So maybe my original comment was not altogether warranted. Price drops on Chinese imports of this size used ? Seem to hold up pretty well on Ebay - probably helped by the quite large price increases on the new ones in recent years. A Warco BH600 has gone on today - will be interesting to see how it goes ! The difficulty with used European machines is getting a decent one (i.e. one not flogged to death in industry) for reasonable money. |
| Jon | 13/02/2012 00:58:31 |
| 1001 forum posts 49 photos | The simple answer then is to bide your time finding the right English or US machine. No chinese import can compete with a 600 Group made machine in terms of thread cutting with or without the Ainjest. Having had a seriously modded ML7 for 9 years then a Harrison 140 which was a total revelation, i could actually do something. I shoved a 16mm masonary drill down the ML7 to i could get above 14mm, still very limited and a right pain. The Harrison 140/11" has a clutch and is made as a metric machine up to 1965, a total joy to use really miss it. The M300 is what the chinese made ones try to emulate but cant. Decent strong castings in fact every item is quality certainly on the older ones built to last and take abuse. Parts are available but expensive. Times may change when the chinese finally after 20 odd years start producing the 600 Groups best asset. One gearbox and no change wheels to faff around with, just dial it in, pitch and whether metric or imperial TPI, easy. Likewise parts are mainly not available, have to be ordered and charged exorbitant rates such as £266 for a 3/4HP motor, Machine Mart price at time was £56. Transfer mini gearbox for mill £244 plus del, i only paid £930 for whole mill. The point being its the same price structure across the board. All i can say is i am glad i didnt buy either the Crusader or the lesser BH600 belt driven jobby with various common metric pitches it cant do 12 years ago. Criminal! |
| mgnbuk | 13/02/2012 07:49:00 |
| 1394 forum posts 103 photos | The M300 is what the chinese made ones try to emulate but cant.
It is my understanding that the current M300 (along with other 600 manual lathes) is a Chinese made lathe, and has been for some time.
The M250 was at one time a Russian built machine, rebuilt in Cleckheaton with a new bed casting (the Russian iron would not harden to the required hardness, I understand) and a couple of gears changed in the headstock to get quieter running.
Pity the M300 didn't get the clutch that was standard on the 140 - as I said earlier, I found the 140 a nicer machine to use than the M300 |
| Jon | 13/02/2012 10:56:09 |
| 1001 forum posts 49 photos | Probably right current M300 etc made in china, mines good ole English when Britain was great. What i cant understand and quite frankly find it unbelievable, is no asian producer even in the reknowned copying capital of the world has to date made a machine with literally a dial in screwcutting box. ie most squarer Colchesters/Clausing and Harrisons from the 50's on. As you know on M300 its only a total of 4 knobs/levers to select any pitch whether metric to 3.5mm or imperial up to 3 1/4 TPI plus modular etc with no missed pitches, thats my point. Its only above 3.5mm pitch the two change wheels 44 and an 88 are reversed to go up to 14mm pitch. There are loads of disgruntle customers having bought a supposed full spec machine to find out they cant cut certain pitches. BH600 is one, many missing. The 140 was made as a metric machine though could do imperial with faffing about with change wheels, i had a full hard to get set but no reversible pitch plate. I swear blind the smaller 140 had a larger width to top slide and definately more travel on the cross feed. Mine was a rare single phase 1 1/2hp motor, believe it or not could put bigger cuts on than 3hp M300. |
| Nigel Bennett | 13/02/2012 13:05:36 |
 500 forum posts 31 photos | Going back to the original question:
1. Do you have the physical space in your workshop for the M300 - and space around it to open all the access covers as well as work at it? And is your floor strong enuff?
2. Presuming you are running on single phase, what power do you have available? If you're running at the end of a single 2,5mm^2 twin-and-earth cable, the amperage you can safely get out of it will seriously limit the size of motor you can drive. (Driving a 3 phase 3hp motor from this via an inverter would not be a Good Plan.)
3. Can you actually man-handle over half a ton of machinery into your workshop? Yes, Mr Cox from Landylift could no doubt help you, but moving it down a long flight of stairs into a cellar would make even him draw in his breath rather sharply.
4. Myford lathes do hold their prices very well - ridiculously so if you look at dealers selling almost new ones - so for a bigger bang for your buck, I'd suggest you go for a Boxford, as a minimum for 7.1/4"g stuff.
5. Don't discount the Colchester Chipmaster, either; it's similarly-sized to the Bantam but does more in the way of screwcutting, if you need that. Again, though, as standard it comes with a 3hp motor.
Good luck with your quest! |
| graham howe | 13/02/2012 14:05:20 |
| 16 forum posts | quote Jon There are loads of disgruntle customers having bought a supposed full
spec machine to find out they cant cut certain pitches. BH600 is one,
many missing. The addition of 2 gears provides all pitches and more. I am unsure why they are not supplied as normal, in my case Warco did supply them. If you have the time to select a used lathe that is in good condition then clearly that is the way forward but if the used lathe requires new parts these can cost more than the purchase price. The Chinese lathes provide an adequate machine especially in the home workshop environment but not a production one but then again that applies to used machines made in UK as they are old designs and don't talk cnc. |
| elanman | 13/02/2012 14:38:38 |
| 47 forum posts 4 photos | Romeo, M300 yes. T300 no, it has no screw cutting. Also for Mod and DP worms you do need the 56T gearwheel supplied with a new M300. As others have said imp or metric is not important, get a DRO. Cheers John |
| David Littlewood | 13/02/2012 16:40:09 |
| 533 forum posts | In answer to Nigel's comments above:
(1) The only access actually required to the innards of the M300 is the two doors to the left of the headstock - the upper one (actually a removable panel) for changing gears (never needed to do it in 4 years) and the lower one to get to the wiring (did it once when wiring up, never opened since. To be fair, to get the best advantage of the large spindle bore, you also need access to get bar material in. In summar, yes it needs a couple of feet the right, nothing else is necessary.
(2) My 3 HP motor and suitable VFD works perfectly well from a normal ring main socket. I actually checked the power consumption with a wattmeter, and the most I could get it up to was 1 kW (i.e. a third of what a typical electric kettle takes).
(3) True; however, I was deeply impressed when Andy (I think) from Home & Workshop Machinery actually lifted the headstock end by himself to move it into position. Note the thing weighs about 680 kg, rather concentrated at the headstock end, and he didn't even want to remove any of the fittings....
(4) True.
(5) Not familiar with them - but see 3 above re power requirements.
In answer to John, I agree that a DRO system is so impressively useful on a milling machine (in fact, having fitted one, I would never again have a mill without one), but I have never felt it to be quite so useful on a lathe so have not fitted one to either of mine. The precision on the leadscrew handwheel on the S7 helps enormously hwere of course.
David Edited By David Littlewood on 13/02/2012 16:43:03 |
| David Littlewood | 13/02/2012 18:39:12 |
| 533 forum posts | Sorry, (1) above should of course say "a couple of feet to the left".
I find the inability to edit mistakes in one's own post on this forum (at least after you have left and come back) is completely daft.
David Edited By David Littlewood on 13/02/2012 18:39:29 |
Please login to post a reply.
Magazine Locator
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our Newsletter
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
Latest Forum Posts
- hemingway ball turner
04/07/2025 14:40:26 - *Oct 2023: FORUM MIGRATION TIMELINE*
05/10/2023 07:57:11 - Making ER11 collet chuck
05/10/2023 07:56:24 - What did you do today? 2023
05/10/2023 07:25:01 - Orrery
05/10/2023 06:00:41 - Wera hand-tools
05/10/2023 05:47:07 - New member
05/10/2023 04:40:11 - Problems with external pot on at1 vfd
05/10/2023 00:06:32 - Drain plug
04/10/2023 23:36:17 - digi phase converter for 10 machines.....
04/10/2023 23:13:48 - More Latest Posts...
- View All Topics
Support Our Partners
Shopping Partners
Subscription Offer
Latest "For Sale" Ads
- Reeves** - Rebuilt Royal Scot by Martin Evans
by John Broughton
£300.00 - BRITANNIA 5" GAUGE James Perrier
by Jon Seabright 1
£2,500.00 - Drill Grinder - for restoration
by Nigel Graham 2
£0.00 - WARCO WM18 MILLING MACHINE
by Alex Chudley
£1,200.00 - MYFORD SUPER 7 LATHE
by Alex Chudley
£2,000.00 - More "For Sale" Ads...
Latest "Wanted" Ads
- D1-3 backplate
by Michael Horley
Price Not Specified - fixed steady for a Colchester bantam mark1 800
by George Jervis
Price Not Specified - lbsc pansy
by JACK SIDEBOTHAM
Price Not Specified - Pratt Burnerd multifit chuck key.
by Tim Riome
Price Not Specified - BANDSAW BLADE WELDER
by HUGH
Price Not Specified - More "Wanted" Ads...
Get In Touch!
Do you want to contact the Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop team?
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.
Digital Back Issues
Donate
Register
Log-in
Model Engineer Magazine
- Percival Marshall
- M.E. History
- LittleLEC
- M.E. Clock
ME Workshop
- An Adcock
- & Shipley
- Horizontal
- Mill
Subscribe Now
- Great savings
- Delivered to your door
Pre-order your copy!
- Delivered to your doorstep!
- Free UK delivery!
All Forum Topics > Manual machine tools > What lathe to get?