Robin Graham | 13/07/2023 01:12:22 |
1089 forum posts 345 photos | It's perhaps a daft question but it's been bugging me and I haven't so far found an answer. If you wanted to measure the 'calorific value' of, say, a portion of bacon you'd bung it in a bomb calorimeter, fill it with compressed oxygen and measure the energy released by complete combustion. Would that be the same as the 'calories per portion' listed on the packet? Obviously what we excrete can be burned and release more energy. Do the numbers on the packets refer to total energy (referred to the baseline of completely oxidised bacon) or to energy released by metabolism? Someone must know! Robin |
Cabinet Enforcer | 13/07/2023 01:33:55 |
121 forum posts 4 photos | Fourth link on my google search, your google-fu is weak Robin-san. Edited By Cabinet Enforcer on 13/07/2023 01:34:20 Edited By Cabinet Enforcer on 13/07/2023 01:34:38 |
Kiwi Bloke | 13/07/2023 02:37:23 |
912 forum posts 3 photos | Food calories only really mean something to dieticians. Conversion factor: 1 calorie = $ n |
Michael Gilligan | 13/07/2023 05:19:21 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | The page linked by Cabinet Enforcer is spot-on [let’s just accept the American spelling], and it includes the important fact that [quote] A food calorie is actually a “kilocalorie” …. [/quote] MichaelG. Edited By Michael Gilligan on 13/07/2023 05:28:36 |
Chris Mate | 13/07/2023 05:43:10 |
325 forum posts 52 photos | My question would be if you measure it in any other way than your body deals with it in general as a specie, or individually, where your body is a chemical, electrical affair, how would that be correct for you as a person eating different foods and having different effects on different people at different ages and level of fitness and physical activity in your life-? can you eat and drink anything including alcohol and maintain a good PH in your body-? |
Gerard O'Toole | 13/07/2023 07:17:19 |
159 forum posts 13 photos | Chris, a good explanation of pH buffering of the body is here Carbonic acid, respiration and renal function all work to maintain correct pH ( about 7.4 ) |
Martin Connelly | 13/07/2023 08:03:52 |
![]() 2549 forum posts 235 photos | Funnily enough I was looking at this YouTube video regarding this subject yesterday https://youtu.be/aD7y03rDmFE It has always struck me as crazy that a claim can be made that peanuts (for example) contain as much as, or more than, the same amount of protein as a beef steak so you should eat peanuts instead of steak. A beef steak is easy to digest whereas peanuts are hard/impossible to digest unless they are ground to a fine paste. A large chunk of peanuts must pass through the gut (same as sweetcorn) due to the indigestible cellulose outer shell that the human body cannot digest. Eat enough and you will find out exactly how well these cellulose capsules can pass through you. As such a lot of experiments regarding the fat, sugar or protein content of foods needs to be taken with a pinch of salt (ha ha) as they do not reflect the body's processes used to extract these nutrients. Even the things you eat in combination makes a difference. Many things we need in out diet are fat soluble and so need to be eaten in a meal that includes suitable fats for it to be absorbed in the gut. An example of something that needs the correct combination of foods is iron, to be absorbed easily you need vitamin C in your diet to avoid anaemia. Martin C |
not done it yet | 13/07/2023 08:12:13 |
7517 forum posts 20 photos | Clues: There are some that burn dried turds for the energy content? From a newspaper column (Mirror, back in ‘21): ‘A kilogram of cow poo can produce enough electricity to power a vacuum cleaner for five hours - so dairy cooperative Arla's herd of 460,000 could fuel 1.2 million UK homes‘ Chewing on coal wouldn’t make us fat?
Edited By not done it yet on 13/07/2023 08:14:11 |
Michael Gilligan | 13/07/2023 08:16:24 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | As an aside … my Human Biology professor assured us that [aside from issues relating to roughage and allergies] a diet of Eggs and Guinness would sustain the human body quite effectively. MichaelG. |
Vic | 13/07/2023 08:46:37 |
3453 forum posts 23 photos | Posted by Martin Connelly on 13/07/2023 08:03:52:
Funnily enough I was looking at this YouTube video regarding this subject yesterday https://youtu.be/aD7y03rDmFE Martin C I saw that video a little while ago. Another one I saw said that it’s not just the amount of food you eat but how you eat it that influences whether you will gain or lose weight. It really isn’t as simple as calories in calories out as we’ve been led to believe. |
Michael Gilligan | 13/07/2023 09:07:25 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Vic on 13/07/2023 08:46:37:
.
It really isn’t as simple as calories in calories out as we’ve been led to believe.
. Shock, Horror … the ‘experts’ who advise us have simply picked up a few catchy phrases from published papers and recite them as Catechism [without much actual understanding]. If you want an extreme example of this, consider the scare-mongering around “ Body Mass Index” MichaelG. |
Martin Kyte | 13/07/2023 10:15:18 |
![]() 3445 forum posts 62 photos | 1 kCal = 4.18 kJ
|
SillyOldDuffer | 13/07/2023 10:23:09 |
10668 forum posts 2415 photos | Well, a calorie (note small 'c' ) is the amount of energy needed to raise 1 gram of water by 1°C. This is a tiny amount of energy, so dieticians use big 'C' calories, which is the amount of energy needed to raise 1 kilogram of water by 1°C. As Robin said Calories are measured in a Bomb Calorimeter. This consists of a sealed vessel of known weight and material, within which the foodstuff is burned in an excess of Oxygen. The before and after ignition temperatures allow the energy released by combustion to be measured accurately. Obviously this is not how animal digestive systems work, but the calorimeter gives the maximum number of Calories available if the animal could recover all of them. Species have adapted to recover energy from different foodstuffs. Cow stomachs have four compartments which allow them to digest grass, mostly cellulose, which humans cannot digest at all - it passes straight through. Cows can't fully digest herbage either, which is why cow poo can be dried and burnt. Although human digestive conversion efficiency is difficult to measure accurately, it's well known that we can extract almost all the energy available from certain foodstuffs, especially Sugars and Fats. As we evolved from hunter gatherers who needed a lot of energy to find food, and often went hungry, we are configured to put on weight in times of plenty, and burn it off later. This causes severe problems to modern man who mostly sits about scoffing an unlimited supply of crisps, Mars Bars, Coca Cola, Alcohol, and Steak and Chips. These are high Calorie foods in a Calorimeter and the human stomach, just the job before the winter famine starts, but we all get fat when there is no famine. Vegetables contain fewer Calories and are digested less efficiently, so we're unlikely to get fat on them. They contain trace minerals, vitamins, and roughage essential to our Biology - digestion isn't just about Calories. Humans are unique in that we're the only species that can convert inedible food into something we can eat. Cooking, fermentation, dissolving, distillation etc. These processes are also good at removing toxins and killing bacteria. On the downside, processing often removes wanted minerals, roughage and vitamins as well, and it's not unusual for them to be chemically restored. Digestion is complicated and still not fully understood. To avoid becoming a diabetic slob, it's best to cut back on high-Calorie foods, but Calories are only one indicator. More recently, British ready meals have started carrying a colour code. Trouble is I like food where Energy, Saturates (Fat), Sugar, and Salt are all code RED, and don't enjoy anything that's good for me. Obesity has become a serious problem in the UK; the NHS is burdened with people who have made themselves ill due to poor lifestyle choices. When I was younger, Brits used to laugh at Americans because they were all so outrageously fat - not now. Modern Brits are also packed full of sugary goodness... Dave Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 13/07/2023 10:23:27 |
Martin Kyte | 13/07/2023 10:35:02 |
![]() 3445 forum posts 62 photos | The most important statement in Dave’s post is digestion is not just about calories. So the result is your body actually starts to fall apart. regards Martin |
Kiwi Bloke | 13/07/2023 10:36:18 |
912 forum posts 3 photos | The calories available for metabolism are those left over after our gut biome has taken its share. And the amount is reduced by many other effects, like transit time, intestinal health, etc., etc. What goes in certainly doesn't all get used. Stop counting calories - eat, drink, and be merry! |
Robin | 13/07/2023 10:43:45 |
![]() 678 forum posts | I just type "calories buttered toast" into Google Robin |
Martin Kyte | 13/07/2023 10:47:22 |
![]() 3445 forum posts 62 photos | Come on guys we are all supposed to be practical people. If your mass is increasing you are either consuming too much (Carbs/Sugars) or you are not burning enough energy. We are our own calorimeter. The packaging info is just there to help. regards Martin |
Neil Wyatt | 13/07/2023 10:55:41 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | A practical consideration. Much effort can be expounded working out what proportion of a calorie in food actually can become body fat compared to how much drops out the other end and how much is burnt in daily metabolism. The figures aren't actually very useful; the rule of thumb that something under 2,000 kcal a day is what’s needed to maintain a healthy body weight for an average person living an average lifestyle allows for this. You might say "33% of the energy in food I eat is wasted" but that doesn't mean you can eat 3,000 kcal and expect to lose weight! If you eat a strange diet (say unchewed peanuts or pure lard), are exceptionally tall, small, very active or bed-bound, then obviously it's going to be less helpful. For what it's worth, I find that at 700 kcal a day I lose about 8 ounces weight a day, but this drops off as I near a sensible weight for my height. Neil |
Neil Wyatt | 13/07/2023 10:58:35 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Posted by Martin Kyte on 13/07/2023 10:47:22:
Come on guys we are all supposed to be practical people. If your mass is increasing you are either consuming too much (Carbs/Sugars) or you are not burning enough energy. We are our own calorimeter. The packaging info is just there to help. regards Martin This is true, but I find food labelling does help me choose healthier options. It's amazing what fat/sugar is packed into some products and how many calories are in starchy foods.
P.S. last night I made myself Stilton and broccoli soup with a very large amount of Stilton in it... in case anyone thinks I am a disciplined eater! |
Mike London | 13/07/2023 11:00:55 |
33 forum posts 1 photos | As an aside … my Human Biology professor assured us that [aside from issues relating to roughage and allergies] a diet of Eggs and Guinness would sustain the human body quite effectively. MichaelG It would probably be a very lonely existence! |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.