John MC | 14/10/2017 14:39:20 |
464 forum posts 72 photos | Hopefully 3 images should appear with this post. Its something that I can remember seeing in my fathers toolbox 35+ years ago, its now in my workshop. It's a top hat shaped bit of metal with a rubber sucker in the middle. I've googled "Dagplate" and "Buck and Hickman" and when I've been able looked at their catalogues and found nothing. I've even asked B&H reps if they know what it is. So, its over to you to satisfy my curiosity. John |
SillyOldDuffer | 14/10/2017 18:02:36 |
10668 forum posts 2415 photos | I think it's for holding a glass blank during some sort of optical process like polishing. DAG might stand for 'Diamond Abrasive Grinding' |
Neil Wyatt | 14/10/2017 18:58:05 |
19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Except you wouldn't use diamond to polish glass. |
Mike | 14/10/2017 19:20:53 |
713 forum posts 6 photos | ....and it's clearly meant to be used as in the last picture, otherwise the Buck & Hickman plate would be upside-down. |
SillyOldDuffer | 14/10/2017 19:24:25 |
10668 forum posts 2415 photos | Posted by Neil Wyatt on 14/10/2017 18:58:05:
Except you wouldn't use diamond to polish glass. Or would you...
|
Watford | 14/10/2017 19:24:30 |
142 forum posts 11 photos | Does the rubber insert remove, and does it reveal anything interesting - like a thread? What, approximately is the major diameter? Mike |
Bazyle | 14/10/2017 19:36:27 |
6956 forum posts 229 photos | Dag is used in some circles as short for Daguerreotype the early photographic technique. It is quite possible it was a device (or part of) to hold photographic plates for polishing. As pointed out by Mike it must have been used that way up. I suggest if the rubber is slightly proud of the surface it would grip a plate placed on it while the top surface of said plate was being polished. |
John MC | 15/10/2017 08:51:04 |
464 forum posts 72 photos | Sorry, should of given some indication of size. The two diameters are 100mm and 75mm, height is 30mm. The small rubber sucker gives very little holding force. When "sucked" down on to my glass surface plate the device moves around quite easily but stays in contact with the plate. Removing the rubber sucker reveals nothing more than a cavity to accommodate it. John |
Roger Provins 2 | 15/10/2017 09:24:00 |
344 forum posts | There's no mention of it in the 1958 B&H catalogue. |
mark smith 20 | 15/10/2017 10:34:55 |
682 forum posts 337 photos | Looks like something off a metallurgical sample lapping machine,you dont say the size of it?? |
Watford | 15/10/2017 10:57:43 |
142 forum posts 11 photos | A Google on "patent dagplate" produced a possible answer. A Daguerreotype or Dag plate was a silver coated copper plate used in early photography to capture the image. The plate needed to be very flat and smooth.. The Dag Plate holder was used (in several forms, some of wood) to hold the plate whilst it was buffed and polished. I suspect that John's Dagplate, marketed by Buck and Hickman, was such an example and is probably a very rare beast.
Mike Edited By Watford on 15/10/2017 10:59:55 |
Watford | 15/10/2017 11:09:58 |
142 forum posts 11 photos | The daguerreotype was the first successful commercial photographic process, and was well within the timescale for Buck and Hickman to be producing such kit.
Daguerrotypes were current from 1839 to around 1860. B&H started around 1830.
Mike Edited By Watford on 15/10/2017 11:17:06 |
Ian S C | 15/10/2017 11:22:03 |
7468 forum posts 230 photos | It says patent applied for, is it possible to search for that sort of thing on line? Ian S C |
Ian S C | 15/10/2017 11:22:04 |
7468 forum posts 230 photos | It says patent applied for, is it possible to search for that sort of thing on line? Ian S C |
mark smith 20 | 15/10/2017 11:47:59 |
682 forum posts 337 photos | I just dont think this thing is any older than the 1960s ,1950`s possibly , so daguerreotype is doubtful. Also they didnt open any branches until 1901. Edited By mark smith 20 on 15/10/2017 11:49:10 |
John MC | 15/10/2017 12:14:17 |
464 forum posts 72 photos | Many thanks for the replies. I think the daguerreotype connection unlikely, the process was more or less forgotten about by the mid 19th century. The "hammerite" paint finish would probably date it to the early 1960's. John |
Bizibilder | 15/10/2017 12:29:57 |
173 forum posts 8 photos | Could it be the top of some kind of test tube shaker? It does look a bit too "heavy" for that but who knows? The idea of the shaker is that you put the base of the test tube in the "sucker" and an eccentric causes the whole metal lump to vibrate thus stirring the contents of the tube. |
mark smith 20 | 15/10/2017 13:18:25 |
682 forum posts 337 photos | the patent i can find is for some sort of pressure instrument but cant see the full patent. |
Neil Wyatt | 15/10/2017 13:27:44 |
19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Posted by John MC on 15/10/2017 12:14:17:
Many thanks for the replies. I think the daguerreotype connection unlikely, the process was more or less forgotten about by the mid 19th century. The "hammerite" paint finish would probably date it to the early 1960's. John I thought the same
|
Rik Shaw | 15/10/2017 14:19:54 |
1494 forum posts 403 photos | Buck and Hickman very clever ladies. Also known as Bing & Grondahl in the US. Produced to save space in the shop the customer simply soaks the item in water overnight to get one of these: Honest !!!!! Rik |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.