Future Subjects
Neil Wyatt | 11/01/2016 11:26:08 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | The series 'One Man and his Lathe' has been generally well received by readers. It allows a lot of different authors to contribute and covers a wide range. So far we have covered:
I have two very obvious omissions from this list - a mini-lathe and the ML10 - lined up for future issues, and a couple of offers of write ups for more obscure lathes in hand or promised. I would be keen to receive offers of write-ups for the following lathes, all of which seem to have their loyal users:
Don't forget, the write ups need to profile the lathe user or at least their hobby activities. Naturally I have no problems with spicing this list up with a sprinkling of more obscure machines (there was the chap restoring a DSG lathe...) Neil
|
Andrew Johnston | 11/01/2016 11:39:02 |
![]() 7061 forum posts 719 photos | How about the Harrison M300? They're popular for those building larger engines and plenty of them about on the secondhand market. There ought to be a new series entitled 'One Man and His Mill'. Andrew |
Ajohnw | 11/01/2016 12:57:52 |
3631 forum posts 160 photos | You forgot the Boxford ME 10, ME for model engineer Neil. There detail differs on all of their lathes. The main ones on the ME10 is back gear engagement and minor maintenance areas plus being Boxford's last bench lathe They often come with the power feeds and the gearbox due to the nature of many people who bought them.
John - |
John Stevenson | 11/01/2016 13:27:23 |
![]() 5068 forum posts 3 photos | What issue was the Bantam in ? |
Chris Gunn | 11/01/2016 13:43:49 |
459 forum posts 28 photos | John, it was 229 June 2015, I hope you like it, I wrote it. Chris Gunn |
Circlip | 11/01/2016 13:59:32 |
1723 forum posts | ' And Emco s Maximat range. Denford small cnc trainers were Emco bed machines.
Regards Ian. |
Emgee | 11/01/2016 14:19:30 |
2610 forum posts 312 photos | Ian, the Denford Orac is a mile away from the Emco 5 and Compact 5 cnc/pc machines in bed design and strength, also marked difference in capabilities when working. I am not knocking either as both machines are good at what they were intended to be and will do a range of lathe work to repeatable tolerances. Emgee Edited By Emgee on 11/01/2016 14:20:15 |
Another JohnS | 11/01/2016 16:58:50 |
842 forum posts 56 photos | Posted by Emgee on 11/01/2016 14:19:30:
Ian, the Denford Orac is a mile away from the Emco 5 and Compact 5 cnc/pc machines in bed design and strength, also marked difference in capabilities when working. I am not knocking either as both machines are good at what they were intended to be and will do a range of lathe work to repeatable tolerances. Emgee But, isn't the Orac based on the EMCO Compact-8 lathe, not the Compact-5? John. |
JasonB | 11/01/2016 17:45:27 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | And the Compact 8 was based on the Ecomat 8.6 without the geared head. |
Ralph H | 11/01/2016 19:10:16 |
![]() 74 forum posts | Neil, just to let you know that I still have full intentions of writing up the restoration of my two c. 1900 large Britannia lathes, as I emailed you about a few months ago. Things have got a little held up but I will be progressing with them within the month, at last. I could also do, for this section specifically, a write up on my large 1916 Drummond lathe? It is the double-height bed type and is 6" x 48", long bed, and I have neither seen nor read about another quite like it, all being smaller. Edited By Ralph H on 11/01/2016 19:16:13 |
Emgee | 11/01/2016 19:14:06 |
2610 forum posts 312 photos | John The Compact 8 had straight cross bracing to the bed rails, Orac has diagonal bracing but heavier than shown for the Emco V10P on Tony's site . It seems the Orac and Emcomat 8.6 were both introduced in the late 70's and have many similar visual design features, not surprising as they were both chasing the same market. Doesn't the same apply now to a greater extent with different badges on the same castings ? Emgee |
Neil Wyatt | 11/01/2016 20:12:31 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Posted by Ralph H on 11/01/2016 19:10:16:
Neil, just to let you know that I still have full intentions of writing up the restoration of my two c. 1900 large Britannia lathes, as I emailed you about a few months ago. Things have got a little held up but I will be progressing with them within the month, at last. I could also do, for this section specifically, a write up on my large 1916 Drummond lathe? It is the double-height bed type and is 6" x 48", long bed, and I have neither seen nor read about another quite like it, all being smaller. Edited By Ralph H on 11/01/2016 19:16:13 Thanks Ralph, let's go for the Brit. first (1) I want to read it so don't get distracted and (2) I'm trying to stick with one owner, one lathe. Neil |
Neil Wyatt | 11/01/2016 20:15:10 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Posted by Emgee on 11/01/2016 19:14:06:
The Compact 8 had straight cross bracing to the bed rails, Orac has diagonal bracing but heavier than shown for the Emco V10P on Tony's site . It seems the Orac and Emcomat 8.6 were both introduced in the late 70's and have many similar visual design features, not surprising as they were both chasing the same market. Doesn't the same apply now to a greater extent with different badges on the same castings ? I read Steven Jay Gould's criticism of the way horse evolution has been presented over the years in the bath this morning. Trying to draw an evolutionary 'bush' for lathes would be far, far more complex! Neil |
gary | 11/01/2016 20:54:25 |
164 forum posts 37 photos | any one know which issue the harrison 250 was in ? |
martin perman | 11/01/2016 21:02:54 |
![]() 2095 forum posts 75 photos | May I offer the CL500, it serves me will with my jobs I give it.
Martin P |
Ralph H | 11/01/2016 21:20:46 |
![]() 74 forum posts | Yes Neil, thank you |
Emgee | 11/01/2016 21:22:43 |
2610 forum posts 312 photos | Posted by Neil Wyatt on 11/01/2016 20:15:10:
I read Steven Jay Gould's criticism of the way horse evolution has been presented over the years in the bath this morning.
Trying to draw an evolutionary 'bush' for lathes would be far, far more complex! Neil A major part of the work for UK and some other manufacturers has been done by Tony at Lathes UK, no doubt some manufacturing history will never be known. Emgee |
Another JohnS | 11/01/2016 21:23:44 |
842 forum posts 56 photos | Posted by Emgee on 11/01/2016 19:14:06:
John The Compact 8 had straight cross bracing to the bed rails, Orac has diagonal bracing but heavier than shown for the Emco V10P on Tony's site . It seems the Orac and Emcomat 8.6 were both introduced in the late 70's and have many similar visual design features, not surprising as they were both chasing the same market. Ah - ok. I have two Compact-8 lathes, but have never seen an Orac CNC lathe in the flesh so to speak, only in pictures, and the family resemblance is obvious. (Two Compact-8 lathes? One to CNC - one of these years; chucks, etc will fit both lathes, and #2 was less expensive than purchasing an Asian 7x lathe) Thanks - John. |
Neil Wyatt | 12/01/2016 13:16:56 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Posted by Emgee on 11/01/2016 21:22:43:
A major part of the work for UK and some other manufacturers has been done by Tony at Lathes UK, no doubt some manufacturing history will never be known. Emgee Tony's website is an excellent resource, but I was think more along the lines of something resembling one of Pete Frame's 'Rock Family Trees' which will be of fond memory to those of us of a particular vintage. Neil |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.