Martin King 2 | 11/12/2014 19:45:47 |
1129 forum posts 1 photos | Hi All, Does anyone know of any plans for converting the crossfeed dial to direct read the amount of cut instead of having to divide by 2? This really annoys me as I keep forgetting.....
Many thanks, Martin |
JasonB | 11/12/2014 19:58:23 |
25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | I would have thought you just need to make a new ring and engrave it with half the number of divisions. EDIT. I'm not really a Myford man but it has a 10tpi screw and the handwheel is usually divided into 100 divisions eg 0.001" each which would be direct reading of cut not diameter Edited By JasonB on 11/12/2014 20:12:03 |
Andrew Moyes 1 | 11/12/2014 21:12:57 |
158 forum posts 22 photos | I would have thought you just need to make a new ring and engrave it with half the number of divisions. Should that be twice the number of divisions? One old division will equal two thou on the diameter. Andrew M |
JasonB | 12/12/2014 07:36:18 |
25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | As he wants to be able to read "the amount of cut" I was thinking 50 divisions rather than 100 so each turn division would be a one thou advance of the tool. But my edit suggests that is what the Myford already has a direct reading of depth of cut not reduction of dia.
Can any ML7 users confiorm the tpi and divisions on teh wheel as to me it looks like a direct reading of cut anyway?? |
Martin King 2 | 12/12/2014 07:51:25 |
1129 forum posts 1 photos | Now I'm REALLY confused! Martin |
Michael Gilligan | 12/12/2014 07:58:29 |
23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Jason,
This [cross slide] one is bent and worn, but it's standard Myford 10 tpi and 100 divisions = Direct reading of displacement. MichaelG. Edited By Michael Gilligan on 12/12/2014 08:01:07 |
Andrew Moyes 1 | 12/12/2014 08:03:58 |
158 forum posts 22 photos | 1 thou on the dial advances the tool by 1 thou. I read it that Martin wanted a dial that shows the change in diameter. Is that correct Martin? |
JasonB | 12/12/2014 08:11:07 |
25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | "direct read the amount of cut" But maybe Martin wants to read "amount cut of the diameter" where most of us would term "cut" as the depth of cut eg how much the tool advances If it is a reading of diameter reduction then yes 100 divs of 0.002" each would do it and is what is on my lathe. J
PS thanks for the confirmation Michael |
Martin King 2 | 12/12/2014 08:57:44 |
1129 forum posts 1 photos | Hi, Yes I want the dial to read the actual amount of reduction in diameter. If work is 1.001" and I feed the crossfeed .001" work should end up at 1.000", not what I have at the moment I am sure. Regards, Martin |
JohnF | 12/12/2014 09:24:36 |
1243 forum posts 202 photos | Hi Martin, what you have is the industry standard, all the machines I have worked on over the last fifty + years have this format, Smart & Brown, Colchester, Boxford, DSG, and my own machines Myford and Emco and few others I can't remember . That's not to say that there may be exceptions but I have never seen any. To do what you want you would have to half the division or make twice as many divisions on your dial --- same result ! This would mean that one division would move the tool 0.0005" thus take a cut of 0.001" off the diameter of the work. Hope this makes it clear to you but if you persevere you will learn to accommodate the standard format and remember if you do choose to alter your machine any other you may start using will give you the same problem. My advice would be stick with it ! Regards John Edited By JohnF on 12/12/2014 09:27:09 |
Michael Gilligan | 12/12/2014 09:35:07 |
23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Martin King 2 on 12/12/2014 08:57:44:
Hi, Yes I want the dial to read the actual amount of reduction in diameter. If work is 1.001" and I feed the crossfeed .001" work should end up at 1.000" . Martin, Sorry, but you can't have it both ways If you [quote] feed the crossfeed .001" [/quote] it will reduce the radius by .001", and therefore the diameter by .002" By all means re-number the divisions to suit your own preference, but there is nothing wrong with the logic of the standard arrangement. MichaelG. Edited By Michael Gilligan on 12/12/2014 09:35:49 |
Andrew Johnston | 12/12/2014 09:40:57 |
7061 forum posts 719 photos | Posted by JohnF on 12/12/2014 09:24:36:
Hi Martin, what you have is the industry standard, all the machines I have worked on over the last fifty + years have this format, Smart & Brown, Colchester, Boxford, DSG, and my own machines Myford and Emco and few others I can't remember . That's not to say that there may be exceptions but I have never seen any. Never used a Harrison then! On my Harrison M300 if I move the cross slide by 10 thou on the dial then the work is reduced by 10 thou on the diameter. Seems more logical to me, as what you're really interested in is the size of the work, not how far the tool moves. Andrew |
Martin King 2 | 12/12/2014 09:57:21 |
1129 forum posts 1 photos | OK Guys , many thanks. Got it now! Its just that a friend has a Hardinge which reads directly and it was a pleasure to use. Cheers all and happy Xmas! Martin |
Russell Eberhardt | 12/12/2014 10:33:59 |
2785 forum posts 87 photos | Posted by Andrew Johnston on 12/12/2014 09:40:57: Seems more logical to me, as what you're really interested in is the size of the work, not how far the tool moves.
Unless you're screwcutting?? I don't see a problem, multiplying or dividing by two in my head doesn't exactly stretch the grey cells. Russell. |
Gordon A | 12/12/2014 11:32:50 |
157 forum posts 4 photos | Martin You could try setting your top or compound slide to exactly 30 degrees and advancing cut from there as I believe that it would give you a direct reading of material removed from the diameter. I stand to be corrected if this is wrong. Gordon. |
Ady1 | 12/12/2014 11:58:10 |
6137 forum posts 893 photos | Or keep your division ring and make a 20 TPI leadscrew |
Muzzer | 12/12/2014 12:31:41 |
2904 forum posts 448 photos | The Colchester Bantam also reads directly in terms of diameter reduction. Once I realised it is fitted with metric leadscrews and dials on the cross slide and topslide (but has an imperial main leadscrew and gearbox!), I was able to see that the dials indicate direct 0.1mm (major) and 0.02mm (minor) increments. I was confused for quite a while by the mixed units, although it seems to be a common situation on Bantams, many of which were supplied to schools. I measure the actual diameter with a digital caliper and dial in the required final cut directly. Works as intended. Murray Edited By Muzzer on 12/12/2014 12:32:34 |
steamdave | 12/12/2014 13:44:11 |
526 forum posts 45 photos | I remember reading somewhere that on Imperial lathes the cross slide dial graduations show the depth of cut and on Metric machines, the dials show the reduction in diameter. I've got two lathes - one Imperial and one Metric, and I get confused when working between them, but I put that down to me old age! Dave |
Graham Butcher | 12/12/2014 14:03:57 |
21 forum posts 3 photos | I wonder whether Myford chose tool movement divisions on the cross slide because users were likely to do milling using a vertical slide. Graham B |
Gordon W | 12/12/2014 14:15:18 |
2011 forum posts | I assumed that dial readings on any machine tool was the actual movement of the slide, until I got an eastern lathe. This has all showing the actual movement except the cross-slide which shows diameter reduction. Took a while to realise that, I don't like the idea but am now used to it. Bores are a real brain ache, thread cutting just needs a bit of thought. When I get the time I do intend to make a new dial, but by then it will be second nature. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.