By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
Forum sponsored by:
Forum sponsored by Forum House Ad Zone

Different Steels

All Topics | Latest Posts

Search for:  in Thread Title in  
KWIL30/01/2011 09:51:52
3681 forum posts
70 photos
Some suppliers will sell you "best commercial quality" steel which they say is EN3B, all I can say is that it is not. I stick to the good supplier who sells you good consistent quality material, anyway as I said above , if in doubt I normalise it.
Ian S C30/01/2011 10:07:30
avatar
7468 forum posts
230 photos
The supplier might say "best commercial quality" and say EN3B, but the manufacturer would say all his steel is the best quality.
One steel that can be a bit of a pain to machine is water pipe. IanS C
ChrisH30/01/2011 18:33:21
1023 forum posts
30 photos

Thanks to all for your input and advices here - much appreciated.
 
Is there a table that shows the different compositions of all the different steels? It would be interesting to compare say EN1A and EN3A.
 
Chris
6196230/01/2011 22:59:35
65 forum posts
1 photos
Chris,
 
Have a look at this website. You should find what you need.
 
/www.roymech.co.uk/Useful_Tables/Matter/Strength_st.htm
 
Eddie
ChrisH31/01/2011 10:51:35
1023 forum posts
30 photos
Eddie,
 
That's great - many thanks,
 
Chris
John Wood131/01/2011 17:32:21
avatar
116 forum posts
Cor, it's all a bit highbrow. Now in my 'last-word-in-technology' workshop (?) I just buy whatever is marked 'BMS' for turning and either HSS or silver steel for toolmaking, it seems to work - most of the time! I expect I will come a cropper somewhere along the line.
 
Good information though guys and all noted in my little black book for future reference.
 
All the best
John
mgj31/01/2011 21:27:23
1017 forum posts
14 photos
I must amit, I have always found black bar a bit of a pain to get a decent finish on, and it can tear like hell milling. Of course it can be done with a slightly rounded nose tip lower feed rates, and lower cutting speeds on a mill. But why bother, since for our purposes 220M07 is out there in copious supply. (And its ANSI equivalent for hte rest of the world)
 
You can of course use one of the general engineering steels if one wants to, but the chances of actually needing to are such that unless one actually can calculate stress and strain, and terms like Youngs Modulus and Poissons Ratio actually means something, one wants to stay away from such critical design.
 
Perhaps I'm fortunate - I ask my people for 220/230 M07, and thats what I get. It machines beautifully, it silver solders easily, and it welds just fine, using Argoshield 5 as a gas. And it case hardens fine well too with Kasenit, for crankpins and other such items - I was going to say heavily loaded, but the stress is actually very low.
 
If I ever want to stress relieve it and normalise to black bar standards, then I could - but for why exactly?
 
We, making models of locos generally want adhesion, and that means mass, so slim and lighweight highly stressed structures are not generally our thing. And if they are one's thing, gererally one will know about it., and be able to do the maths to enable their use.
 
To give you an idea - Metre Maid with 1.5" cylinders running at 80psi. You get a mighty 140 lbf of thrust.  onto the driving crankpins. Do the sums of load by area on 1/2" dia pins  in single shear, and you are struggling to make 3/4tonf/sq in. Whats the yield of 220M07 - 12tons or so, UTS at 20-24 tons. Havent looked it up  but it will be in that range.  Not even beginning to stretch it. You are not even in the fatigue range. 
 
 

Edited By mgj on 31/01/2011 21:40:29

Edited By mgj on 31/01/2011 21:53:00

Niloch01/02/2011 00:08:25
371 forum posts
mgj - welcome back - again!
Martin W01/02/2011 00:47:14
940 forum posts
30 photos
Hi mjg
 
Been missed great to have you back again .
 
Best regards
 
Martin
 
PS  Sorry about the smiley !!

Edited By Martin W on 01/02/2011 00:56:16

mgj01/02/2011 06:02:48
1017 forum posts
14 photos
Thanks gents. been doing some serious building.
 
Smiley is fine Martin.
 
Chris H. If you want to know about the composition of steel, and how carbon content affects tensile stregth, and how the disposition of that carbon can radically alter properties, then Tubal Cains Hardening and Heat treatment is as good a book as any.  He's pretty good on the basics of metalurgy in stell, and the effects of carbon content on the crystal structure.
 
The point is that some alloys are not heat treatable, and some can alter properties radically, and that such properties are altered by very small % of carbon (mostly) and other alloys. But, but is one much interested  in a long list of alloying contents, such as say silica which is added to act as a welding flux?  And does it make any difference to most of us to know that EN XYor Z is a .2 or some other % steel.  UTS and yield perhaps, if we are designing is about as much as we want, unless there are very specific points to the application, like fatigue, temperature and so forth.
 
BTW the old EN designations and current euro numbers are in  TC Engineers Handbook for the normal range of steels of machining steels.
 
What do most of us do with our steel. We chomp it into a shape which is probably highly unstressed, so you could use monkey metal and get away with it (we do in the form of cast iron), and occasionally it forms a sliding surface so we case harden - and by adding carbon to the surface and quench hardening, we could have started with the proverbial monkey metal, but we still end up with a glass hard surface on a soft matrix.  True some steels are better for hardening than others, and leaded free cutting is not a great case hardener, but it will take a shallow case, and thats good enough isn't it. 
 

Edited By mgj on 01/02/2011 06:25:55

ChrisH01/02/2011 10:42:15
1023 forum posts
30 photos
Hi mgj,
 
My query was prompted by the article in the latest edition of MEW by Harold Hall and his manufacture of lathe fixed/travelling steadies.
 
For the frames and clamp plate he specified 230M07 and for the base 070M20; I was wondering what the difference was and if the base was made of 230M07 what would be the likely problems.
 
Looking at most - well, at least some - of the suppliers of steel for model engineers, the general steel available seems to be 230M07; not many, in fact I don't think I have come across any, that do anything else, hence also the query. Perhaps I am looking in the wrong place.
 
I am not really too bothered in reality what the chemical compositions are, I was just searching to satisfy my curiosity. If I eventually make a fixed steady to suit my lathe, which is old and in all probability a ready made fixed steady could not be found, I shall probably make it all in 230M07 - the whole steady would I guess be very lightly loaded.
 
I now wait some someone to jump up and tell me why this should not be done!
 
ChrisH
 
P.S. Tubal Cains Hardening and Heat treatment is on my "to buy" list! 

Edited By ChrisH on 01/02/2011 10:45:38

Keith Long01/02/2011 11:19:33
883 forum posts
11 photos

Hi Chris

For the steadies virtually anything will do for the material - if you were desperate double the thickness of plywood would probably work fine as well.

In the article Harold states in the small "background" box the he used standard "mild steel" sections. I think there is a danger in subsequently quoting material spec numbers that it starts to look far more important and precise than it really is. Aluminium would be quite ok for the bodies of both rests if you happened to have a suitable chuck or came across some at the right price.

In many cases the designs that we see published were originally made from whatever was at hand in the junk box, scrap pile or whatever.

If material specs. really matter for the part being then hopefully the person designing /making it have enough knowledge of what they are doing to realise it and specify accordingly - and preferably state why so subsequent builders know the reasons for the spec.

Keith

Peter G. Shaw01/02/2011 14:44:17
avatar
1531 forum posts
44 photos
FWIW, Mr. Hall wrote an almost exact equivalent of the current issue's article in MEW5. Or should it be the other way round? Ne'er mind eh!
 
Anyway, the original used imperial and aluminium.
 
Not that I've anything against HH - I think he does some good stuff, but.....
 
Regards,
 
Peter G. Shaw
mgj01/02/2011 14:45:00
1017 forum posts
14 photos
Chris - 220M07 is leaded sulphur bearing low carbon mild containg about .1% carbon. 230M07 doesn't have the lead, and so doesn't finish to that lovely high shine with the rainbow patterns - quite so easily.
 
070M20 is IIRC either EN3A or B, which is slightly tougher .2ish % carbon mild steel, so its not as nice to work with.
 
I'm sure the man is right, but it seems a little pedantic to select one over the other on a base for a steady, when half the rest of the world uses even lower strength cast iron or cast LM4 ali which is as close to monkey metal as you can get! This isn't exactly taking either a lot of load, or a lot of wear (use washers where appropriate), and if you are really worried, case harden where necessary, but I wouldn't bother. Given how often one actually has to use a steady, this one will see us both out in its normal unadorned state.
 
Keith is dead right about relative importance.
 

Edited By mgj on 01/02/2011 14:50:11

Gordon W01/02/2011 15:07:26
2011 forum posts
I've just made a simple ,and very rough, steady to allow me to face a flange on the end of a 4" dia tube. Piece of black bar 1" x 1/2", bent round a former, bent cold. Welded to bit of 2" x 1/2" for a base, with clamp screw hole to take original bolt. Drill and tap M10 in 3 places. Make brass end caps for M10 bolts. For heavier use will weld extra stiffening. This is not brilliant but does the job.
Nicholas Farr01/02/2011 18:55:46
avatar
3988 forum posts
1799 photos
Hi, how about this steady which I cobbled together many moons ago to fit my late fathers RandA lathe. It has at least two different steels, a mallable cast butterfly vavle carcus, and a bit of brass. Apart from the HT socket head screws, (which were just available), I've no real idea of what the specs for the different metals are.
 
It works fine, only downside, I have to fit it to the lathe at the same time as the piece that is being steadyed, but hey, there was no cost for the materials, just pretty please to my departmental head at the time.
 

Regards Nick.

Edited By Nicholas Farr on 01/02/2011 18:58:08

ChrisH02/02/2011 14:49:22
1023 forum posts
30 photos
mgj, Keith,
 
My sentiments entirely!
 
Chris
Niloch08/02/2011 13:34:37
371 forum posts
Section 23 - Material Specifications - of Harold Hall's Metalworker's Data Book (Workshop Practice Series No.42) might be helpful for this thread.
WALLACE09/02/2011 21:46:14
304 forum posts
17 photos
When I started with this metal bashing lark, I brought a pre-war book on engineering - the type of thing I imagine an apprentice would have spent his first weeks wages on.
 
All good stuff - except for the section on materials where it gives specs for 'Vickers Staybrght' or ' Cast Elektron' etc etc.
 
Haven't a clue what they are in terms of what we can buy today !
 
w.
 
 
David Clark 109/02/2011 22:03:50
avatar
3357 forum posts
112 photos
10 articles
Hi There
Staybright is a very cheap version of stainles steel.
Easy to bend and machins ok although a bit sticky.
Not sure if vickers staybright is the same.
regards david
 

All Topics | Latest Posts

Please login to post a reply.

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!

Find Model Engineer & Model Engineers' Workshop

Sign up to our Newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.

You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
cowells
Sarik
MERIDIENNE EXHIBITIONS LTD
Subscription Offer

Latest "For Sale" Ads
Latest "Wanted" Ads
Get In Touch!

Do you want to contact the Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop team?

You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.

Click THIS LINK for full contact details.

For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.

Digital Back Issues

Social Media online

'Like' us on Facebook
Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter
 Twitter Logo

Pin us on Pinterest

 

Donate

donate