Any views or opinions ?
Dave C | 28/06/2012 17:18:22 |
102 forum posts 37 photos | I am at the minute considering buying an edge finder and I am keen on the idea of the digital type. Has anybody any advice about them. Are they worth the extra money ? Are they any more accurate than the conventional type.Are there any specific makes to consider or avoid, Recommended suppliers even. Any advice gratefully recieved thanks. Dave c
|
Les Jones 1 | 28/06/2012 18:04:29 |
2292 forum posts 159 photos |
Hi Dave, Les. |
JasonB | 28/06/2012 19:16:39 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | I use my electronic one a lot, it has a cylindrical end that is rigid so you do need to watch what you are doing. I got mine from Greenwood tools but not sure if they do them now. |
Martin W | 28/06/2012 21:55:49 |
940 forum posts 30 photos | Dave I use the standard rotating mechanical, analogue for want of a better description, edge finder and find that it seems to be accurate with good repeatability. Not only that but as the contact body is only retained by a spring then there is no problem if it is wound in to far, just back off and try again.
While this doesn't answer your question directly I would, if you haven't got one already, buy one of these mechanical varieties and give it a go as they are only a 'few squid each' , as Bogstandard would say Cheers Martin PS
With the mechanical edge finder there are no batteries to go flat and they can be used on plastics and insulating materials as well Edited By Martin W on 28/06/2012 21:57:11 Edited By Martin W on 28/06/2012 22:00:50 |
Michael Gilligan | 28/06/2012 22:45:16 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos |
Posted by Les Jones 1 on 28/06/2012 18:04:29:
(I do not see how it can be described as digital.)
Les, Strictly speaking, I suppose it IS digital One or Zero, On or Off ... But one-bit digital isn't very interesting. MichaelG.
|
russell | 29/06/2012 04:47:34 |
142 forum posts | there are electronic types available which dont rely on conductivity of the material, but on movement of the contact probe. In fact, one of the members of MSMEE (melbourne SMEE) has built his own based on his interpretation of a patent found 'on the net'. Cant remember the patent owner right now, but big in measuring tools... It has 3 pairs of contacts (ball bearings) arranged in a circle (120 deg apart) and a spring loaded disk with contacts which sit between the balls. All is connected in series with a lamp. ANY movement of the probe, which is perpendicular to the disk, breaks the circuit. he checked it against a 'real' one, with fine results. (he used a commercial probe, as for any edge finder its essential to know the precise dimension of the probe...)
- russ
Just had a thought...as its not 'spinning' when in use, its clearly essential the probe is concentric with its mounting spindle. I dont think that is a consideration with the mechanical 2piece spring loaded one, so it probably requires more care to build...although the last 'how to' article i read on making one suggested that a cylindrical grinder was an essential tool in its construction.) Edited By russell on 29/06/2012 04:51:42 |
Michael Gilligan | 29/06/2012 06:59:30 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | He is using it for more than simple Edge-Finding, but this may be what you have in mind, Russ. MichaelG. |
Ady1 | 29/06/2012 12:18:39 |
![]() 6137 forum posts 893 photos | He is using it for more than simple Edge-Finding, but this may be what you have in mind, Russ. ---- Damned interesting stuff, his picture of a NZ coin is really impressive, quite high sensitivity Glue a broken part back together, touch-cad it, then cnc a new one...
The making-moulds industry would love it too Make a complicated object out of wax etc and touch-cad it? Edited By Ady1 on 29/06/2012 12:21:36 |
JasonB | 29/06/2012 12:26:12 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | As Bogs says some have quite large shanks, mine is 1/2" so easily fits in a collet or drill chuck. I do give the finder a half turn between taking pairs of measurements just to even out any possible eccentricity. J |
Les Jones 1 | 29/06/2012 14:29:40 |
2292 forum posts 159 photos |
Hi All, It is just a piece of 5 mm ground rod pressed into a hole in the insulator. The insulator was made from nylon (I think). The outside was first turned to about 10 mm diameter. A length of about 5/8" rod was mounted in the lathe chuck and bored out so the insulator was a press fit. the insulator was pressed in to the bar and then bored out so the 5 mm rod was a press fit. Without removing it from the chuck the outside of the 5/8" bar was turned down to 1/2" It was then cut off from the end of the bar that was in the chuck. The 5 mm rod was then pressed into the insulator. making it this way should ensure it is concentric. The indicator was just an LED bicycle rear light (Bought from a £ shop.) with a single transistor amplifier to drive the LED's The connection to the 5 mm rod was just made with a crocodile clip. Another very simple edge finder is a ball bearing on the and of a short piece of rod. The rod is mounted in the chuck / collet. The outer of the bearing is marked with a felt tipped pen so you can see if it is rotating. With the mill running the bearing is moved towards the work piece until the outer just stops rotating when it makes contact with the work piece.
Les. |
Roy M | 29/06/2012 16:18:55 |
104 forum posts 7 photos | I would advise the purchase of the rotating 'wobbler' type of edge finder over the stationary digital type. Unless you can guarantee the accuracy of your tool-holding and condition of the spindle tapers, any perceived advantage gained by electronic wizardry will be lost. I use the cylindrical type most frequently, which will repeat to within .01mm. The ball type takes a bit more care to use accurately, but offer a choice of probes which can allow you to take a datum position from a narrow slot or small dia hole. Neither of the above are any where near as expensive as the electrical circuit type, and are a lot more forgiving. (Over travel can cost you £60!! |
Jon | 30/06/2012 00:34:05 |
1001 forum posts 49 photos | Current electrical jobby is same as Jasons, got mine special offer from J&L some years back. Repeat accuracy i reckon is 0.02mm with differing intensities and runouts. Previous had another 1/2" shank easily collapsable throwing errors every time put in a chuck. Gave up the ghost when spinning it was already gone. A mechanical dial would be better even the Wigglers. In saying that i do use the electric to set vices etc and the laser type to line up marks in plates.
|
Michael Gilligan | 30/06/2012 07:59:59 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Ady 1, There is another Digitizing Probe, very nicely drawn-up by Shaun Wainford; available via Lester Caine's website. MichaelG. Edited By Michael Gilligan on 30/06/2012 08:12:27 |
Ady1 | 30/06/2012 08:26:42 |
![]() 6137 forum posts 893 photos | cheers |
Dave C | 30/06/2012 14:02:55 |
102 forum posts 37 photos | Thanks for the information and advice from all. I think I will stick with the conventional mechanical edge finders after all. Many thanks Dave C |
Martin W | 30/06/2012 15:18:26 |
940 forum posts 30 photos |
A quick thought
If you are familiar with using edge finders then ignore most of the above Cheers Martin |
John Haine | 01/07/2012 10:26:54 |
5563 forum posts 322 photos | The company referred to above by Russell is Renishaw plc - bit of an unsung hero of Britich engineering IMHO - worth browing their website. The touch-trigger probe was their first product, the first device to allow a CNC machine to automatically orient itself relative to the workpiece I believe. It was patented internationally, e.g. US 5146691. There have been a couple of home-made interpretations, e.g. and a recent one in the Digital Machinist mag. |
Nigel Bennett | 01/07/2012 14:23:34 |
![]() 500 forum posts 31 photos | My preferred method is a fine sharp needle held in a pin chuck. It does need care in selection to get one that's true to the axis - I discarded about a dozen bent ones! Use that and a 10x or 15x loupe and it's pretty well good enough for most things. |
David Haynes | 03/05/2013 15:06:55 |
168 forum posts 26 photos | There are quite a few edge finders on the market, many include centre finders. Does anyone have any favourites or recomendations? I currently use a feeler gauge and a bar in the mill chuck/collet with a bit of maths, but sometimes this is fiddly. Thanks, Dave |
Stub Mandrel | 03/05/2013 19:30:32 |
![]() 4318 forum posts 291 photos 1 articles | If you use any edge finder, don't take the size for granted, measure it. The spherical probe on mine is 0.248" diameter... Neil |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.