Ace Chandler | 15/03/2021 21:47:10 |
29 forum posts 1 photos | I posted a thread a while ago on my poor surface finish.
https://www.model-engineer.co.uk/forums/postings.asp?th=165810
Since then, I've been persevering and things have been getting better. I've discovered:
one odd thing I still can't track down is that facing cuts are way smoother thatn normal turning operations. I get that lovely crisp sound, no vibes through the machine and a nice clean trace of swarf. It could be that I'm not very good with sharpening HSS yet and somehow whatever point I'm acheiving is better for a facing cut than a regular turning operation. Anyway - things are better now than they were, but still am finishing off the peices with some emery paper to get a reallly nice finish. any other suggestions are very welcome.
/A |
Nigel Graham 2 | 15/03/2021 22:04:25 |
3293 forum posts 112 photos | Not only cheaper than carbide, but HSS is more versatile in that you can shape the tool for best results with the material. Insert tolling will cover most tasks but is a fairly fussy system in some respects. I use both, depending much on what I am doing. ' Also try to make the ground finish on the tool as smooth as possible. You could do a lot worse than but a copy of Harold Hall's book on tool and cutter grinding. He tries to tempt you making simple, adjustable grinding-rests but the main thing is careful attention to tool geometry. Nevertheless, his grinding-rests are intended to greatly enhance an ordinary bench-grinder and help you grind lathe tools to decent standard, including the accuracy needed for things like screw-cutting. ' Dead-centre... Or the steady if you have one, where applicable. A piece of thin card well-oiled, wrapped round the bar once and its ends trapped in the steady clamp is an old dodge for avoiding the steady marking the work. ' Emery paper? Well, yes, I use it occasionally but not on the lathe if I can possibly avoid it. It's better to achieve a good standard of tool-finish. |
Pete. | 15/03/2021 22:19:21 |
![]() 910 forum posts 303 photos | Sounds like a tangential tool holder could be for you, I just bought the 16mm left and right set from eccentric engineering, they weren't cheap, but very well made, not had a chance to try them yet, you could make smaller ones to experiment with quite easily. Watch the videos on YouTube, it's quite impressive, it holds round HSS also, you can buy carbide of the correct dimensions very cheaply also to use in them, worth a look. |
Emgee | 15/03/2021 22:20:00 |
2610 forum posts 312 photos | Ace Make sure you have the HSS tool ground to give clearance from the work after the cutting edge, any drag there will cause poor finish, the term is Back Clearance and needs to be around 5-7 degrees. Emgee Edited By Emgee on 15/03/2021 22:23:44 Edited By Emgee on 15/03/2021 22:32:48 |
Vic | 15/03/2021 22:24:43 |
3453 forum posts 23 photos | Here’s an idea for you to try Ace. |
bernard towers | 15/03/2021 23:41:21 |
1221 forum posts 161 photos | Ace, you don’t say how much material is sticking out of the chuck which can be a factor or if your chuck jaws are not bellmouthed, try reducing spindle speed or use a centre if the stock is long. |
Hopper | 16/03/2021 01:57:42 |
![]() 7881 forum posts 397 photos | Posted by Ace Chandler on 15/03/2021 21:47:10:.... ..., but still am finishing off the peices with some emery paper to get a reallly nice finish. any other suggestions are very welcome.
That's nothing to worry about. Standard procedure in plenty of professional machine shops. Good way to get the best finish and the last half thou of exact size without going under. Even the great GH Thomas in his books on Workshop Techniques etc recommends it -- but draws the line at using a file to get final finish and size. He recounts this would bring hoots of derision if seen in the machine shop at his "works", but emery cloth or paper was quite socially acceptable. Best to use a little oil on your emery paper or cloth for a good finish. Some pics of your work and the set ups used to achieve it would help further analysis. |
Howard Lewis | 16/03/2021 08:04:52 |
7227 forum posts 21 photos | If you have a lathe with power feed for Cross Slide as well as the Saddle, the feed rate is often half for facing compared to that for sliding. Assuming that your tooling is correctly ground, accurately set on centre height, and rigidly held, the surface speeds and feed rates need to be suitable for the material being machined. If the work and / or tool are flexing you are unlikely to get a good finish or accuracy. For HSS and mild steel, 100 feet per minute usually works pretty well. Some materials are ridiculously difficult to machine nicely. Rebar is terrible stuff, not meant for machining and behaves like it! Tool angles, ideally, need to match the material being cut. A tool ground for mild steel will not function as well on a much harder grade of steel, or on brass. For most of my finishing cuts, I use a Tangential Turning Tool, either shop made or the Eccentric Engineering version. I always use a centre height gauge to set tool height, whether HSS or carbide. Do not grind large clearance angles, since this weakens the tool. Also, the lack of metal behind the edge means that heat cannot be conducted away, so that tool life is shortened. The exact angle is probably not too critical, a degree or two either way is unlikely to be world stopping, but clearances are important, to ensure that the tool cuts at centre height, without rubbing anywhere else.. Personally, I tend to minimise top rake. (Parting off is often a problem for some folk My inverted parting tool is used with no top rake ) Usually, clearances are in the range of 5 to 10 degrees. Ian Bradley's "Amateurs Workshop", L H Sparey's "Amateurs Lathe" and Harold Halls books or one of the Workshop Practice Series will give advice on tool grinding. Some times a lubricant or soluble oil, or neat oil will improve matters. BUT not always, it can result in intermittent cutting! You can reach the situation where the lubricant prevents cutting until a lot more pressure builds up, and the tool then cuts with a vengeance. But having released the pressure, until the oil film is broken again, no cutting takes place! And so the cycles repeats itself. Remember that even with a fine power feed you are effectively cutting a screw thread. It may only have a pitch of 0.002" (50 microns) and be 0.001" (25 microns ) deep but it is still a helix. A small radius on the tool will disguise this and improve the finish A large radius can cause chatter, especially with deeper cuts. When stoning a rad onto the nose of the tool, be careful not to take more off the cutting point than below it, otherwise the actual cutting point will not be at centre height and the tool will rub rather than cutting as wanted. Turning will not match a ground finish, although with care good finishes can be acheived. You are gaining experience, keep working at it! HTH Howard |
Buffer | 16/03/2021 08:15:01 |
430 forum posts 171 photos | There is a good video on you tube by Oxtools. Where he shows finishing a hss tool on an oil stone. Each time he cuts some steel he says "yeah it's not bad but I think I can do better than that." So you get to see how finishing the hss improves the finish on the work. Worth watching in my opinion. |
Ace Chandler | 16/03/2021 08:49:14 |
29 forum posts 1 photos | Posted by Buffer on 16/03/2021 08:15:01:
There is a good video on you tube by Oxtools. Where he shows finishing a hss tool on an oil stone. Each time he cuts some steel he says "yeah it's not bad but I think I can do better than that." So you get to see how finishing the hss improves the finish on the work. Worth watching in my opinion. Indeed - my ability to grind tools well is definitley 'basic' at the moment, so that's the next skill to learn. At present, I'm a bit ham fisted with the bench grinder and so the faces of my tool look "not flat", they look more like geodesic domes at present
all grist to the mill though on a journey of learning.
|
Buffer | 16/03/2021 09:17:23 |
430 forum posts 171 photos | Ace I can definitely recommend a tangential turning tool form Eccentric Engineering then, the link is on this site. It only has one side to grind and that is flat. It can be done with a linisher, which is what I do or touched on the flat side of the grinding wheel. The jig that comes with it takes care of the angles. It is my most used tool and it leaves a great finish on Steel Ali and Brass with no messing about whatsoever. You just need to give the top and sides a light rub on an oil stone to get a superb finish. It seems pricey but it honestly works very well. |
not done it yet | 16/03/2021 09:25:24 |
7517 forum posts 20 photos | Posted by Howard Lewis on 16/03/2021 08:04:52:
If you have a lathe with power feed for Cross Slide as well as the Saddle, the feed rate is often half for facing compared to that for sliding. Ha ha, my previous lathe seemed like only one tenth of the rate. A factor of 6 or 7 was likely reality! They corrected that fault on my current version. Assuming that your tooling is correctly ground, accurately set on centre height, and rigidly held, the surface speeds and feed rates need to be suitable for the material being machined. ✔️ Altering the speed and depth of cut ‘on the run’ (if possible), while practising, can be quite enlightening. Final finishing cut is best done at the same settings as the previous cut - until confident of your machine/ability. If the work and / or tool are flexing you are unlikely to get a good finish or accuracy. ✔️ Number one cause with a lot of machines! For HSS and mild steel, 100 feet per minute usually works pretty well. Some materials are ridiculously difficult to machine nicely. Rebar is terrible stuff, not meant for machining and behaves like it! ✔️✔️ (if the HSS is the cutter - you will likely need carbide to cut HSS!). Tool angles, ideally, need to match the material being cut. A tool ground for mild steel will not function as well on a much harder grade of steel, or on brass. ✔️There are exceptions - like Aluminium inserts for good surface finishes on steel). For most of my finishing cuts, I use a Tangential Turning Tool, either shop made or the Eccentric Engineering version. ✔️ Using the TTT as a shear tool can provide a super finish, but not always appropriate. I always use a centre height gauge to set tool height, whether HSS or carbide. ✖️ I don’t have one. Tail post centre for rough setting - and facing cleanly at the centre is the fine setting. But sometimes a fraction higher if/as the tool is deflected downwards under cutting forces. Roughing deflects the cutter more than finishing (but who worries about the finish while roughing?) Do not grind large clearance angles, since this weakens the tool. Also, the lack of metal behind the edge means that heat cannot be conducted away, so that tool life is shortened. ✔️ Cutting edge must be furthest out, or the “apparent’’ cure would be to cut below centre height - not a good idea! The exact angle is probably not too critical, a degree or two either way is unlikely to be world stopping, but clearances are important, to ensure that the tool cuts at centre height, without rubbing anywhere else.. Personally, I tend to minimise top rake. (Parting off is often a problem for some folk My inverted parting tool is used with no top rake ) ✔️ Usually, clearances are in the range of 5 to 10 degrees. Ian Bradley's "Amateurs Workshop", L H Sparey's "Amateurs Lathe" and Harold Halls books or one of the Workshop Practice Series will give advice on tool grinding. ✔️ but lots of other sources. Some times a lubricant or soluble oil, or neat oil will improve matters. Nearly always, IMO. Neat cutting oil is my usual ‘go to’, or WD40 for Al. BUT not always, it can result in intermittent cutting! You can reach the situation where the lubricant prevents cutting until a lot more pressure builds up, and the tool then cuts with a vengeance. But having released the pressure, until the oil film is broken again, no cutting takes place! And so the cycles repeats itself. Usually something wrong with the set up - not rigid, wrong cutter, not sharp - or the operator. Remember that even with a fine power feed you are effectively cutting a screw thread. It may only have a pitch of 0.002" (50 microns) and be 0.001" (25 microns ) deep but it is still a helix. Why I like the shear tool on occasions - but one only needs a surface finish good enough for purpose. I try not to leave a one thou (or even 2 thou) cut as the last. A small radius on the tool will disguise this and improve the finish See above but cannot always get to all parts of a cut. A large radius can cause chatter, especially with deeper cuts. ✔️ When stoning a rad onto the nose of the tool, be careful not to take more off the cutting point than below it, otherwise the actual cutting point will not be at centre height and the tool will rub rather than cutting as wanted. ✔️ As explained above, cutting edge must be the first contact point of the cutter with the work. Turning will not match a ground finish, although with care good finishes can be acheived. ✔️ It’s a reason why I got my surface grinder - but it ‘s not a cylindrical grinder. You are gaining experience, keep working at it! ✔️ Rome was not built in a day. HTH Howard Apologies to Howard for adding my points (in bold) to his superb and fairly comprehensive listing above, but I think they do show that there are often more ways than one of ‘skinning that cat’. Polishing with Emery is not a bad practice, if there is a need for a better finish or to lose that last few tenths as a really fine adjustment for size, finish or taper. Just make sure that no abrasive gets in between the lathe moving surfaces. |
Howard Lewis | 16/03/2021 11:45:29 |
7227 forum posts 21 photos | Hi Richard! No apologies needed. None of us are always right on every subject. Your points are good, and add to the information. There will always be an exception to some rule. I was once told that according to aerodynamic theory a Bumble Bee should not be able to fly! Tried a shear tool, with 0.001" DOC and feed of 0.0025"/rev. Purely a one off my results, with or without oi neat oil seemed to be the same as freshly ground Tangential tool. Quite impressed, must try it again. Another case of Horses for Courses. Whilst I try to avoid using abrasives on the lathe, Emery, used safely, is a form of free hand grinding, so will improve surface finish. My trouble is that my hands are not graduated. The important thing is to clean up afterwards. Howard |
Vic | 16/03/2021 11:55:19 |
3453 forum posts 23 photos | Posted by Buffer on 16/03/2021 09:17:23:
Ace I can definitely recommend a tangential turning tool form Eccentric Engineering then, the link is on this site. It only has one side to grind and that is flat. It can be done with a linisher, which is what I do or touched on the flat side of the grinding wheel. The jig that comes with it takes care of the angles. It is my most used tool and it leaves a great finish on Steel Ali and Brass with no messing about whatsoever. You just need to give the top and sides a light rub on an oil stone to get a superb finish. It seems pricey but it honestly works very well. Yes agreed Buffer. I have both bought and Home made Tangential tools and they work very well. I particularly appreciate the built in height adjustment so works great in a four way tool post. I’ve even turned HSS in my lathe with one using a carbide cutter. |
David George 1 | 16/03/2021 12:22:59 |
![]() 2110 forum posts 565 photos | Hi Howard if you use emery cloth on a lathe as I do sometimes, don't use a finger to hold it use a piece of stick or wooden part like a sanding block but thinner. I saw a work mate twist of his finger whilst polishing a champher on a piece of steel tapped 3/4 UNF. He had just turned a lead in champher and got a slight chatter and using his finger he pressed the small piece of emery on to the champher when it grabbed and screwed his finger into the hole and twisted off his finger at the second knuckle. Also if you wrap a piece of emery round the outside it can grab and pull in your hand. Use a piece of wood with the emery around to press on to the piece. David Edited By David George 1 on 16/03/2021 12:23:35 |
Howard Lewis | 16/03/2021 12:37:56 |
7227 forum posts 21 photos | Hi David! Quite correct. I used the word "safely" implying wrapping the emery along a piece of wood, (Which Neil Wyatt pointed out some time ago, is the approved method ) Lollipop sticks are handy way of holding the emery. If you don't, you could become a lot more wrapped up in your work than you want! Howard |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.