Low profile, Tried and tested slitting saw holder.
Roy M | 16/01/2017 11:58:59 |
104 forum posts 7 photos |
The main body diameter is 39mm. and the shank dia is 20mm. this is to accommodate the M10 x 85 cap-head screw that clamps the flanged nut from the back, enabling close proximity to the work-piece. The locating spigot is 25.35 dia x 1.5mm.with a minimal u/cut. Overall length of body 32.5mm and the shank length is 60mm. fFats are machined on the body (34 a/f)to assist with tightening. The body is bored to 19.05mm x 27.5 deep. The flanged nut is 39mm dia.x 5.5mm thick and the body is turned to 19.00mm dia x 22 long. the flange is under cut 1.5mm deep. The general concept can,of course,be modified to suit. Replacing with an M8 cap-head screw would enable a smaller dia shank, for instance.
|
Michael Gilligan | 16/01/2017 12:21:36 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Roy, Nice job ... I made someting similar for my BCA, but with the shank the same shape as a collet. BUT, to my shame; I forgot to include the spanner-flats One day, the saw snatched & tightened the screw so hard that I had to drill the head off to release the tension. ... Lesson learned !! MichaelG. |
MW | 16/01/2017 12:24:45 |
![]() 2052 forum posts 56 photos | Very nice little project. One thing you might want to do is make the shank a bit longer so that you have less difficulty trying to get at some work pieces with it. Most mills have a spindle quill, so it should make this less of a problem, if you did need to extend it over the top of a dividing head for e.g
Michael W Edited By Michael-w on 16/01/2017 12:31:13 |
Neil Wyatt | 16/01/2017 13:04:55 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Posted by Roy M on 16/01/2017 11:58:59:
The main body diameter is 39mm. and the shank dia is 20mm. this is to accommodate the M10 x 85 cap-head screw that clamps the flanged nut from the back, enabling close proximity to the work-piece. The locating spigot is 25.35 dia x 1.5mm.with a minimal u/cut. Overall length of body 32.5mm and the shank length is 60mm. fFats are machined on the body (34 a/f)to assist with tightening. The body is bored to 19.05mm x 27.5 deep. The flanged nut is 39mm dia.x 5.5mm thick and the body is turned to 19.00mm dia x 22 long. the flange is under cut 1.5mm deep. The general concept can,of course,be modified to suit. Replacing with an M8 cap-head screw would enable a smaller dia shank, for instance.
A short write up for MEW might be appreciated? I like the relatively small nut, the much bigger one on my holder (to allow different bore sizes limits its use, yet all my slitting saws have 1" bores except two that are too small for the holder! |
Roy M | 16/01/2017 13:18:32 |
104 forum posts 7 photos | I would quite enjoy submitting a write up,I expect I will have to redo the drawings first. Really constructive comments so far, and it was the shortcomings of what is commercially available, that drove me to make my own. Normally, I find, that 'universal' usually means 'compromised'. |
MW | 16/01/2017 13:30:43 |
![]() 2052 forum posts 56 photos | This would be a good idea because the commercially available miniature arbours tend to be quite expensive. Michael W |
Tool | 09/03/2018 17:46:34 |
11 forum posts | Hi, As a newbie back in the 70's I finish machined my holder in a collet in my mill - when used it was still "eccentric" presumably because of the accuracy of the saw . I also forgot the spanner flats!! Tool |
not done it yet | 09/03/2018 18:52:15 |
7517 forum posts 20 photos | Starting with a morse taper blank is one easy mod to the project, I suppose? The shank size, above, would nicely suit an ER32 collet chuck, but the diameter would not be critical unless using a Clarkson type holder or morse taper collets. The key would mostly prevent the over-tightening problem experinced by the odd user. My 22mm arbor for the horizontal mill is based on an MT 2 blank arbor. It is surprising how easy it is to get cheap chinese involute cutters working more evenly, so there must be a bit of run out over the length of the arbor, but it has not bothered me yet. |
Nigel Taylor 2 | 09/03/2018 20:27:22 |
27 forum posts 10 photos | My version of a slitting saw arbor is similar, but different! |
Roy M | 09/03/2018 20:37:32 |
104 forum posts 7 photos | Nigel Taylor 2. Great minds think alike! I can't understand why these are not available commercially, I have searched several trade catalogues over the years but never found anything similar. Roy M
|
Chris Evans 6 | 10/03/2018 09:15:59 |
![]() 2156 forum posts | Over the years I have made several but now I will make two more based on the designs by Roy and Nigel. Both have good ideas. |
Journeyman | 10/03/2018 09:27:08 |
![]() 1257 forum posts 264 photos | Quite like the simplicity of Nigel's version and might have a go at making one similar. Can I ask, assuming normal clockwise spindle rotation, does the nut have a tendency to undo? My mill has no reverse so I can only run it in one direction. Perhaps I should use a left hand thread and nut? John |
Wout Moerman | 10/03/2018 11:15:48 |
57 forum posts 2 photos | Both seem nice designs. I presume the clamping force for the saw must be as far outward as possible ? In the first design I see some recesses but not in the second. Is it flat? |
Nigel Taylor 2 | 10/03/2018 12:27:35 |
27 forum posts 10 photos | I've not found a problem of the nut undoing, and, yes, the clamping face is flat. When I got a set of slitting saws and an arbor, I found the arbor made positioning the workpiece awkward. I also thought it looked clumsy so I designed and made a low-profile version. My slitting saws are 5/8 inch internal diameter, so that is the size of the bottom portion. The flange is 7/8 inch diameter and 3/32 inch thick. The collar is bored out to 5/8 inch with a stepped diameter. The smaller end is a close fit over the thread. I choose to use a ½ inch UNF nut, partly because I liked the finer pitch compared to using M12 and also to try screwcutting an ‘imperial’ (American) thread on a metric lathe using just the standard changewheels. The shank is 10mm diameter, to suit an ER20 collet. This picture shows the arbor in use. When I made it, I slightly undercut the ‘corner’ by mistake, so I have to use a spacer when using very thin saws. However, my arbor design meant I could clamp the 12mm square piece directly to the mill table to cut the slit in it.
|
Journeyman | 10/03/2018 14:30:43 |
![]() 1257 forum posts 264 photos | Posted by Nigel Taylor 2 on 10/03/2018 12:27:35:
I've not found a problem of the nut undoing, and, yes, the clamping face is flat. Thanks for the info Nigel, now on the list of projects, it has to be much better than the multi-diameter one I use at the moment. John |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.