John Flack | 07/01/2017 09:46:15 |
171 forum posts | As someone responsible extending this discussion, may I say that my gas lit childhood and reading the Beano by candlelight things were a little simpler. No this is not a leg pull !!!!!!!!! It really was like that in my parents home in the 1940/1950s |
Toby | 07/01/2017 09:51:17 |
117 forum posts 17 photos | I've not much to add except I think that RCDs were around in the 1990s so the fan (and hence the filter) was hopefully designed for them. But yes, I agree with Mike, the easiest approach is to bypass the filter and see if it still causes a problem. If it is ok then a new filter should sort it. |
Ajohnw | 07/01/2017 10:48:17 |
3631 forum posts 160 photos | I might be inclined to remove it and also if possible check the rcd. If that is faulty a replacement might be ok. It might not be. Brush dust is a well known cause of the problem. It can be difficult to get rid of it entirely as well. RCD's were about well before the 90's. Not sure when they started being regularly put in houses though. I married in 85 so it was well before that. My electronics workbench at work was initially fitted with a stupidly low one. Later increased and later still modified 2 way adapters were provided with the earth disconnected from the supply. Painted red. Earth loops were interfering with measurements. There is still some scope for having gear that isn't protected this way but I think anyone trying to get round it that way in a private workshop or house could be breaking the law now. I've never lived in a property with RCD's but do recollect that there were a lot of screams and shouts when they started appearing in houses. All sorts tripped them out. I don't know what the current levels were initially. I do know that there were thoughts about preventing electrocution but having once been involved with worries in that direction I don't think that is actually possible. The current regs were more or less established by i would say 1980 or there abouts. Some aspects seem to have been dropped. The voltage drop aspects etc were all there. When I rewired my fathers property he flatly refused to have a plastic consumer unit fitted. He got some one to find him and old metal one that had been removed from some where else so I'm not surprised that the plastic ones are forbidden now. Good job too. Stupid idea. Apart from bonding and at the time the lack of conduit the wiring would meet current regs. Bonding was specified but not needed then. The need for conduit seems to have disappeared in houses anyway. Whoops Toby might pick me up on that. Conduit of some sort - seems to depend on where hidden cables run. John - Edited By Ajohnw on 07/01/2017 10:57:24 |
Russell Eberhardt | 07/01/2017 11:55:12 |
![]() 2785 forum posts 87 photos | I thought it strange that plastic consumer units are regarded as unsafe in the UK but are the norm in most of the EU then I noticed that "Electrical Safety First Best Practice Guide No. 1 (Issue 3) " is published by Electrical Safety First whose address is The Metal Box Factory etc. Am I just being suspicious? Russell |
Toby | 07/01/2017 12:20:10 |
117 forum posts 17 photos | No, I am not going to pick you up on that John Yes, conduit is not generally used in houses nowadays unless additional mechanical protection is needed. Even then I think the recommendation is 3mm steel which rules out normal conduit! Although I think that 3mm is a figure picked out of the air by some guy at NICEIC so can be argued about. RCDs and running cables in prescribed zones is the usual way of handling things nowadays. You are also right that RCDs were around well before the 90's, I wasn't clear but I meant common in houses (ie mandated on sockets etc) which I thought started around 2000. That said, I have just looked at wikipedia and it says the wiring regs were started in 1882 but I think it was the 16th edition that mandated RCDs on sockets and that was in 1991, so earlier than I thought. As to whether RCDs stop electrocution. They don't, but they certain reduce the risk dramatically in the most common situations. As you say though, it depends on what you grab! I like RCDs and think that (generally) they are a good idea. However can cause problems, particularly with motors and inverters so I can understand why some people are not so keen. Actually, on that subject it is worth mentioning that it is still well within the regs to supply equipment without an RCD. It just has to be done the right way (and with a risk assessment) and you certainly cannot use a 13A socket! I am of course not advocating that as a solution when the problem is actually faulty equipment
|
Toby | 07/01/2017 12:24:24 |
117 forum posts 17 photos | Posted by Russell Eberhardt on 07/01/2017 11:55:12:
I thought it strange that plastic consumer units are regarded as unsafe in the UK but are the norm in most of the EU then I noticed that "Electrical Safety First Best Practice Guide No. 1 (Issue 3) " is published by Electrical Safety First whose address is The Metal Box Factory etc. Am I just being suspicious? Russell To be fair, I don't think they have made metal boxes there for quite a few years..... |
Ajohnw | 07/01/2017 13:49:14 |
3631 forum posts 160 photos | The reason for the metal boxes is simple - anything goes wrong in there - rats chewing cables etc can happen and it will most definitely blow a fuse if it causes a problem. The other aspect is fire risk and if so fumes. Fire risk is also now the main reason for rcd's but I feel that they are still a bit bound up on other aspects. In other words how much current to cause a fire? Bit of an imponderable. I'm pretty sure higher current trip level RCD's are still available. Not sure that anyone can use them but believe that the official feeling is that any rating is better than none.
I used to talk to some one who was directly involved in establishing the regs. Conduit would make it easy to replace cables. It's fortunate for many people that rubber was bigger than pvc so the pvc could generally be pulled through. The other thought was drilling holes in walls. The metal type they used in houses probably didn't help at all with that. The latest addition is bugging me. 10mm^2 bonding on gas pipes just past the meter. If you have one of the people in who can work on the supply side of things they have to leave a card saying this should be done. There are also some cowboys about leaving card saying must do it now. The person who left one here was apologetic about it and shook his head when he told me about the 10mm^2. He said he has to leave them just about everywhere he goes. I said no way. He said we will just run it around your door - our front door in this case on the outside. So I said no you wont you'll fit an earth spike to which he said that the problem with those is ensuring they are really in contact. Testing I suppose. Well there are metres and metres of metal pipe work running off the things so I am pretty sure it would pass just as it is. Same with the water pipe. It seems that both can come in on plastic now but why 10mm. In a lot of more recent house the run would be very short. It's long on ours but the water pipe bonding cable on most house will be long. Then I remembered a complaint from the suppliers a long time ago. So much current was being dumped to earth that the local potential compared with the substation earth was often too high so wonder if this is a cheap way of them improving it as something doesn't make sense. Anyway leaves me wondering why regs don't state test it and fix if needed as far as bonding is concerned. John -
|
Russell Eberhardt | 07/01/2017 14:17:10 |
![]() 2785 forum posts 87 photos | Posted by Ajohnw on 07/01/2017 13:49:14:
The reason for the metal boxes is simple - anything goes wrong in there - rats chewing cables etc can happen and it will most definitely blow a fuse if it causes a problem. The other aspect is fire risk and if so fumes. Fire risk is also now the main reason for rcd's but I feel that they are still a bit bound up on other aspects. In other words how much current to cause a fire? Our French rats are far too fat to get into a consumer unit. (Most of them are in Parliament Russell. |
Frances IoM | 07/01/2017 14:49:37 |
1395 forum posts 30 photos | RCDs were around but not mandated or generally in use in early 1980s (+ also expensive + rather restricted in choice IRC) - I fitted them when I had to rewire a house but advice at time was to leave some non RCD circuits specially for fridge + freezer spurs. My flat in IoM has a plastic box (fitted pre current metal box regs) retrofitted with RCBOs but current fire regs for flats on Island required a heat detector in sight of box! Edited By Frances IoM on 07/01/2017 14:50:09 |
Muzzer | 07/01/2017 15:10:03 |
![]() 2904 forum posts 448 photos | RCDs have been mandatory on TT systems for several decades, possibly the 60s? They were fitted by the supplier and it would have been a serious offence to tamper with them. |
Ajohnw | 07/01/2017 15:34:41 |
3631 forum posts 160 photos | There are loads of plastic consumer units on ebay. One mentioned must be fitted with into a fire proof box. I doubt if they really allow that. A number of them are water proof. The regs imply that these can't be used for any purposes in a domestic environment - or some seem to think they do. One thing I wondered is if the switch and rcd was taken out and just the current trips left would it still be a consumer unit. Maybe even if just the rcd was taken out. To make up a sort of distribution board / super junction box for spurs etc. I think I read somewhere about the height of consumer units above the floor being regulated. If we ever updated our and it was moved indoors the most sensible places are all over 6ft off the floor. Can't be under the stairs so some child at some point might play with it. Our consumer units are good old Bakelite that has stood the test of many many years. Personally when comprehensive regulations are introduced I think a lot of people should be retired off when they are reasonably ok. A problem with people. If they have a job they are almost bound to carry on thinking up other things to do. One new idea which seems to be purely aimed at circumventing one aspect of the regulations is being rolled out when smart meters are installed. They fit a totally separate isolator in the feed to the consumer unit so that ordinary electricians can work on them. Pulling the fuses isn't ok any more - I mean they are sealed. That's what the man told me anyway - so it doesn't need some one like him to work on it. John -
Edited By Ajohnw on 07/01/2017 15:35:14 |
Gordon W | 07/01/2017 17:19:29 |
2011 forum posts | Way back in 1970 we rebuilt an old house, got grants etc. so had to comply with the regs. .Consumer unit had an RCD. |
Toby | 07/01/2017 17:30:49 |
117 forum posts 17 photos | Posted by Ajohnw on 07/01/2017 13:49:14:
....... The latest addition is bugging me. 10mm^2 bonding on gas pipes just past the meter. If you have one of the people in who can work on the supply side of things they have to leave a card saying this should be done. There are also some cowboys about leaving card saying must do it now. The person who left one here was apologetic about it and shook his head when he told me about the 10mm^2. He said he has to leave them just about everywhere he goes. ...... Anyway leaves me wondering why regs don't state test it and fix if needed as far as bonding is concerned. John I don't think omitting an RCD is quite like pat testing. Pat testing is there to ensure that something isn't damaged or faulty and unsafe. ie works as designed. It is hard to argue that is not a good idea. Whether you have an RCD or not is a design issue. There are some circumstances where they are not a good idea as they will cause problems. eg machine tools with out of phase currents, medical equipment where an interrupted supply could cause harm, etc. Hence the regs say RCDs should be used on socket outlets not exceeding 20A and mobile equipment used outdoors with a current rating of less than 32A. The point being that both of these are higher risk, either because you cannot control their use (eg sockets) or because of the environment (outdoors). For lower risk stuff the need for RCDs is not so important. In fact there is also a exception - for a specific socket that is for use for a particular item of equipment and labelled as such. So I have one socket in my garage/workshop that is not RCD protected. It is specifically for my door entry system because I would really like to be able to get in, even if a bit of water gets in the electrics So if someone had a machine that was not faulty but still caused RCD problems I would have no problem fitting a non RCD outlet for it. I would of course want to make sure the machine was wired in such a way there was no chance of cable damage or other accidental access to a live part and that the machine was properly earthed. Bonding is a real can of worms! This is one area where it should be sorted even it was ok against the regs when installed. Hence the gas man giving everyone leaflets saying it must be done. In fact the 10mm2 min is actually for PME/TNC, for TNCS or TT it can sometimes be 6mm2. Like I say, it is a real can or worms and can actually cause a hazard - I have seen a video of a gas pipe smoking due to a PME system fault being earthed through the bonding! However in general it can save lives if there is a fault somewhere outside the property and can be essential in ensuring an RCD works properly for an internal fault. EDIT: forgot to say, the guidlines DO say test and fix for bonding. Strictly no work should be done unless bonding is present and measures less than 0.05 ohms, but it doesn't necessarily need to upgraded to 10mm2 if it appears ok. Toby Edited By Toby on 07/01/2017 17:41:17 |
Toby | 07/01/2017 17:34:51 |
117 forum posts 17 photos | Posted by Gordon W on 07/01/2017 17:19:29:
Way back in 1970 we rebuilt an old house, got grants etc. so had to comply with the regs. .Consumer unit had an RCD. I am guessing that house had an TT earth system (earth rod, rather than earthed through the suppy). I think that as the only reason for needing one back then. EDIT, just noticed Muzzer already mentioned the need for an RCD on TT systems. Edited By Toby on 07/01/2017 17:35:34 Edited By Toby on 07/01/2017 17:35:49 |
Toby | 07/01/2017 17:46:28 |
117 forum posts 17 photos | Posted by Russell Eberhardt on 07/01/2017 14:17:10:
Posted by Ajohnw on 07/01/2017 13:49:14:
The reason for the metal boxes is simple - anything goes wrong in there - rats chewing cables etc can happen and it will most definitely blow a fuse if it causes a problem. The other aspect is fire risk and if so fumes. Fire risk is also now the main reason for rcd's but I feel that they are still a bit bound up on other aspects. In other words how much current to cause a fire? Our French rats are far too fat to get into a consumer unit. (Most of them are in Parliament Russell. I think this was one of the reasons the UK went metal only (even though the regs say "made of a non-combustable material). Various tests showed that plastic units from big manufacturers that were made of "fire retardent plastic" actually burnt very nicely! So rather than trust them to use decent plastic in the future they just told us not to use plastic at all....... |
Emgee | 07/01/2017 18:23:05 |
2610 forum posts 312 photos | Posted by Muzzer on 07/01/2017 15:10:03:
RCDs have been mandatory on TT systems for several decades, possibly the 60s? They were fitted by the supplier and it would have been a serious offence to tamper with them. Hi Muzzer I believe you have stated RCD (residual current device) when you should have stated ELCB (earth leakage circuit breaker), the ELCB as it's name suggests was operated by a voltage passing to earth, there was an earth conductor connected to the earth bar metallic frame of the consumer unit and another seperate conductor connected to an earth electrode. The ELCB was supplied and fitted by the electrical contractor and left with meter tails connected, connection of the tails to the meter was carried out by the electricity supply company after which the lead security seals were attached. The Wylex brand was usually 60A DP black in colour with a yellow circular trip test button, the Chiltern make was grey in colour with a yellow trip testing bar. The RCD is operated by an out of balance Line and Neutral current and has no earth/cpc connected in any way. The more modern term RCCB is now mandatory on TT supplies but with a much greater size earth conductor to the stake/electrode. Emgee Edited By Emgee on 07/01/2017 18:36:35 |
Muzzer | 07/01/2017 19:14:23 |
![]() 2904 forum posts 448 photos | Good point. As you say, an ELCB is triggered by the current flowing from the ground electrical connection to the earth rod, whereas an RCD doesn't need any earth connection to operate. Acronyms!! My Cambridgeshire house was wired in TT (overhead supply) and had a grey ELCB. Sounds as if it may have been a Chiltern brand. However, I discovered that it didn't have a ground rod and the gas and water incomers were plastic. The "ground" circuit floated somewhere between ground and 230V - enough to deliver a nice zing due to the cumulative leakage current - until I installed a 1m ground rod. Incidentally, in US and Canada, the wiring "code" (aka regulations) specify that garage receptacles (sockets) must not be GFCI (RCD) protected. I believe this was based on the need for something like garage door openers, engine block heaters or similar to function without risk of tripping. It always struck me as questionable practice if the garage is actually used as a workshop, given the damp, concrete floors, lots of mains equipment etc often ffound in basement workshop / garages. I fitted an extra outlet from our hot tub GFCI to run my 220V workshop equipment when we lived there. Murray |
Robin Graham | 07/01/2017 20:26:00 |
1089 forum posts 345 photos | I was being lazy - thought it might be a well known component in brushed motors which someone here would instantly recognise. Googling on Schnaffrner FN2010-01-06 reveals that it is an EMI supressor, basically a C/L/R choke.. I think I have enough info to sort it out now. Thanks., Rob.
|
Ajohnw | 07/01/2017 21:22:26 |
3631 forum posts 160 photos | Posted by Toby on 07/01/2017 17:30:49:
EDIT: forgot to say, the guidlines DO say test and fix for bonding. Strictly no work should be done unless bonding is present and measures less than 0.05 ohms, but it doesn't necessarily need to upgraded to 10mm2 if it appears ok.
Toby Edited By Toby on 07/01/2017 17:41:17
What I meant actually was that they should test the pipe itself. Part if not the main reason for doing it is shorts in the house to a pipe but I suspect they are up to what I mentioned on the gas pipe as 10mm"2 doesn't make much sense. To get the grounding to work well they would probably need to bond the domestic side to the actual gas feed to the house bypassing the flexible pipe that is fitted to our meter back to the stop cock. They change those every now and again and have also now switched to a style that it incredibly light weight. If it came to the bonding failing before the flexible did I'd back the bonding. This doesn't sound safe to me. An interesting page on who is responsible for what indicating that electricians can / can't pull fuses as the extra isolation isn't shown very clearly. I don't think I mentioned the saga of the pulled fuse. We have 2 meters with independent feeds. I've long suspected that they are on different phases, Anyway one day no power on the 2nd floor. Other houses had power so I pulled out the main fuse to check them. No seal on them anyway. Ok so phoned them. They had a phase fail so I mentioned the fuse and said I can put it back in. Muttering in the background and then no there might be a spark to which I said I can turn everything off. No we will send some one out. Using a name for them that many will know what I mean 3 suits turned up in a posh car to put the fuse back in all wearing macs not overalls and one had the bits needed to seal the fuse in his pocket. There was even a discussion about who should put it back in. It was delegated by the man who appeared to the the senior one. John - |
Nick Hulme | 07/01/2017 21:28:25 |
750 forum posts 37 photos | Posted by Muzzer on 07/01/2017 19:14:23:
Incidentally, in US and Canada, the wiring "code" (aka regulations) specify that garage receptacles (sockets) must not be GFCI (RCD) protected. I believe this was based on the need for something like garage door openers, engine block heaters or similar to function without risk of tripping. It always struck me as questionable practice if the garage is actually used as a workshop, given the damp, concrete floors, lots of mains equipment etc often ffound in basement workshop / garages. I fitted an extra outlet from our hot tub GFCI to run my 220V workshop equipment when we lived there. Murray Common sense allows long-term avoidance of electrocution, as would adequate education. But it's obviously better that we have legislation that protects the ignorant and leaves no leeway for those with niche requirements and adequate intelligence and technical knowledge. Another plus point is a fat living for those retro-fitting un-necessary equipment to replace adequate existing installations. Given there's nothing else thinning out the herd these days I'd recommend damp string insulation on live wires with adequate labels and signage
|
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.