Les Jones 1 | 10/01/2016 10:54:04 |
2292 forum posts 159 photos | I think Johnboy25 is correct that the impedence of that antenna connector is probably 300 ohms (Check the specification information in the radio manual.) It is very unlikely you will have the equipment to measure the impedence at 230 Mhz (DAB radio frequency.) The DC resistance will not be 300 ohms. To match it correctly to 75 ohm coax you should really use a balun transformer but it should work without but there will be some attenuation of the signal. Les. |
Johnboy25 | 10/01/2016 10:58:48 |
![]() 260 forum posts 3 photos | Yes I agree with your observation Les. I was referring to impedance as opposed to DC resistance.👍😀 |
Michael Gilligan | 10/01/2016 11:16:33 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Les Jones 1 on 10/01/2016 10:54:04:
I think Johnboy25 is correct that the impedence of that antenna connector is probably 300 ohms (Check the specification information in the radio manual.) . Les, I posted a link to the 'instructions' earlier ... they appear to be silent on such technicalities. ... Maybe there is a proper manual somewhere. MichaelG. |
Andrew Johnston | 10/01/2016 11:28:26 |
![]() 7061 forum posts 719 photos | Posted by Les Jones 1 on 10/01/2016 10:54:04:
I think Johnboy25 is correct that the impedence of that antenna connector is probably 300 ohms Most likely given that the theoretical impedance of a folded dipole is around 292 ohms. Andrew |
Johnboy25 | 10/01/2016 11:41:47 |
![]() 260 forum posts 3 photos | 300 ohm being the nominal impedance for a folded dipole - if you like to look at the theory a little more in depth take a look at http://www.vias.org/radioanteng/radio_antenna_engineering_03_09.html |
Nick Hughes | 10/01/2016 12:18:06 |
![]() 307 forum posts 150 photos | Posted by Mick Henshall on 09/01/2016 20:27:46:
To Mick H, may be some confusion here-see my post about freeview box turning itself off, I think Nick's post may have been reply to me, I may be mistaken but his suggestion works for me, Mick Ahh, I didn't realise that there was a Mick H involved in this thread (I must start to read all threads from the start), so apologies for the confusion caused. Nick. |
Mick Henshall | 10/01/2016 13:57:29 |
![]() 562 forum posts 34 photos | No worries Nick, would have replied earlier but I bin listening to the radio! Mick |
Russell Eberhardt | 10/01/2016 13:58:54 |
![]() 2785 forum posts 87 photos | If you have an internet connection in your shed the easiest way to get LBC would be: **LINK** It's just one of 30,000 stations available on that site! Russell. |
mick H | 10/01/2016 14:03:28 |
795 forum posts 34 photos | Russell, works brilliantly indoors. Unfortunately no internet in shed.....as yet! Things may change. Mick |
Howard Lewis | 10/01/2016 15:29:17 |
7227 forum posts 21 photos | being purely a mechanical engineer, I would agree, (on the basis of the picture) with the likelihood of the Antenna input being 300 ohm, and with the need to match the antenna and connecting cable impedance to that of the set, to maximise power transfer. Radio hams usually opt for "as high as possible" for antenna positioning, and in alignment with the transmitter. At 225MHz the elements of a yagi are going to be pretty short, (digital TV is around 240 / 250 MHz from memory, So your radio antenna is going to be only a bit larger. A folded dipole is likely be even smaller, end to end. The data already posted plus a bit of calculation should allow you make reasonable antenna, and position it for best reception. Having said all this, I very rarely switch on the FM radio in my shop! Too busy metal mangling! Howard |
Clive India | 10/01/2016 16:09:36 |
![]() 277 forum posts | Posted by KWIL on 09/01/2016 12:37:24:
You have to remember that the BBC is no longer in charge of the transmitters. All stations are run by Arquiva, so do not blame the beeb. Only partially correct. They are run by Arqiva under contract to BBC. The BBC are still totally responsible for the transmission of their services both in quality and availability. Posted by Howard Lewis on 10/01/2016 15:29:17:
At 225MHz the elements of a yagi are going to be pretty short, (digital TV is around 240 / 250 MHz from memory, o your radio antenna is going to be only a bit larger. Howard Digital TV is transmitted in Bands 4 and 5, channels 21-68, give or take some in the middle being hived off. The frequency is between about 480MHz and 900MHz and DAB is in Band 3 at about 225MHz, so quite a bit different. There should be no problem in receiving TV and radio in Boston since it is only about 30 miles from the high power transmitter at Belmont which has a mast of 1265ft, line of sight and 30 miles away, providing there is nothing in the way. The problem is usually a poor aerial being used inside, instead of a decent aerial outside at a good height.
Edited By Clive India on 10/01/2016 17:05:18 |
Jon | 10/01/2016 23:09:03 |
1001 forum posts 49 photos | Its been 30 odd years since dabbled with radio and aerials though easy to make. I still use an early 2002 or 3 Roberts DAB Gemini 25 RD-25 discontinued around 12 years ago able to pick up, just checked 36 stations was 59 at one point. Ultra rarely get dropouts perhaps twice a year used daily with standard taped together busted aerial. Same time pondered over an Alpine DAB in car via extra tuner box, I bottled out knowing would be useless when moving and an uncertainty over Signal to Noise Ratio and Sensitivity being ok. One or two transmit above 128 kbps but not many more suited for tonal quality than stereo imagery but good enough when machines are running and I was a hifi freak up to 25 years ago, says something. Noticed over 13 years more and more stations pulling out of VHF and DAB going internet only. Luckily have Ethernet hard wired in to workshop done 12 years ago, so when Roberts packs up, cant believe its still going I would go Internet route but what to get? |
Bazyle | 10/01/2016 23:47:30 |
![]() 6956 forum posts 229 photos | If you go internet keep an eye on the data rates and accumulated data usage unless you are on an unlimited tariff. |
mick H | 11/01/2016 07:02:45 |
795 forum posts 34 photos | Posted by Clive India on 10/01/2016 16:09:36:
There should be no problem in receiving TV and radio in Boston since it is only about 30 miles from the high power transmitter at Belmont which has a mast of 1265ft, line of sight and 30 miles away, providing there is nothing in the way. The problem is usually a poor aerial being used inside, instead of a decent aerial outside at a good height.
Edited By Clive India on 10/01/2016 17:05:18 The proximity of the Belmont transmitter just adds to the frustration Clive. I would have thought that being so close it would blast out transmissions on a crystal set! Mick |
Michael Gilligan | 11/01/2016 07:30:20 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Mick, For what it's worth ... Here is the Ofcom DAB Coverage Plan for Lincolnshire. I still think the biggest problem is Sony's receiver [and the instructions!] Have you tried another receiver in the same location ? MichaelG. |
mick H | 11/01/2016 08:01:10 |
795 forum posts 34 photos | Thanks for that Michael and I wish it were that simple. I have just bought a new car with an allegedly state of the art DAB radio and the problems are similar if not worse. It is a common complaint in this area. Having said that I think that the flimsy aerial connection to the Sony is a poor show. Mick
|
Michael Gilligan | 11/01/2016 08:12:14 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Mick, It does took like there are local area problems It may be worth keeping an eye on this site. MichaelG. |
mick H | 11/01/2016 08:29:16 |
795 forum posts 34 photos | Michael, I think that that site and attached comments tell it all in a nutshell. Strangely, or even perversely the coverage map for 11D does not seem to cover Skegness.......but I went to Skegness yesterday and reception for LBC was perfect, cutting in at Wainfleet! I was beginning to think that I might be the problem! Mick
Edited By mick H on 11/01/2016 08:30:52 |
Michael Gilligan | 11/01/2016 08:42:16 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Mick, Looking at this version of the map, I notice that you are almost equidistant from three major DAB transmitters. ... I am way out of my depth, now, but I suspect that a directional antenna would help a lot. Multipath reception causes 'birdies' on FM, but Digital probably just fails !! Hopefully, others can advise in detail. MichaelG. |
Clive India | 11/01/2016 09:11:52 |
![]() 277 forum posts | Posted by Michael Gilligan on 11/01/2016 08:42:16:
Mick, Looking at this version of the map, I notice that you are almost equidistant from three major DAB transmitters. ... I am way out of my depth, now, but I suspect that a directional antenna would help a lot.Multipath reception causes 'birdies' on FM, but Digital probably just fails !!Hopefully, others can advise in detail.MichaelG. I understand your thinking Michael and the logic. However, DAB is not transmitted in the same way as FM. It is much more resilient to multipath. National DAB is transmitted on a single frequency network which is synchronised and therefore the problem you highlight is addressed. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.