Michael Gilligan | 01/01/2015 19:55:44 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Douglas Johnston on 01/01/2015 17:40:28:
The level mentioned by Ian L2 does indeed have a resolution of 0.02mm per m, but the Moore &Wright one mentioned by NJH has the resolution of 3.5 thou per foot or approximately 0.3mm per m. Quite a difference in resolution between the two when they are both intended for a similar purpose. Doug . Doug, That is a very interesting difference, and may help explain why some find 'levelling' easier than others! My guess is that 0.02mm per m is too sensitive for practical use. MichaelG. . P.S ... The build quality of that 0.02 level is what really worries me ... [See Nealeb's description, posted earlier today] It's very easy to make a ridiculously senitive vial [in extremis; a straight tube]; but that doen't guarantee a useful instrument. Edited By Michael Gilligan on 01/01/2015 20:22:17 Edited By Michael Gilligan on 01/01/2015 20:24:37 |
Swarf, Mostly! | 01/01/2015 21:08:03 |
753 forum posts 80 photos | Posted by Clive Foster on 31/12/2014 17:15:57: SNIP In my view the best all round instrument for this sort of thing is the once common WW2 era vintage 6 inch (nominal) base gunnery clinometer featuring a 30 second of arc vial and a nice adjusting system covering a few degrees scaled to 1 minute accuracy. That is a measuring instrument and supremely easy to use. Couple of pictures, not very good I'm afraid, of mine. Clive Edited By Clive Foster on 31/12/2014 17:21:13 Hi there, all, Some time ago I bought a level (clinometer ?) like the one Clive shows in his post. Unfortunately, the bubble is longer than the scaled part of the tube - I suspect it has invited a few relatives in for Christmas! I'd replace the tube if I could obtain a suitable one - what is members' experience regarding availability of spare tubes? I dimly remember a link to Cromwell's web-site but can't retrieve it now. Best regards, Swarf, Mostly!
|
Nealeb | 01/01/2015 21:27:07 |
231 forum posts |
P.S ... The build quality of that 0.02 level is what really worries me ... [See Nealeb's description, posted earlier today] It's not exactly the best-made tool in my garage! But the bottom is flat, the graduations are about right, and the adjusting screw is fine enough to be able to zero it with an end-for-end check. The great thing about a level is that it is self-checking. I'm happy that I have my money's worth, given the price of even second-hand levels from a recognised manufacturer. I would agree that 0.02mm/m is very sensitive. I'm using it with feelers to measure differences in level and I am regularly needing the 0.05mm feeler to bring the bubble on-scale. |
Michael Gilligan | 01/01/2015 21:36:46 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Nealeb on 01/01/2015 21:27:07:
... I'm happy that I have my money's worth, given the price of even second-hand levels from a recognised manufacturer. I would agree that 0.02mm/m is very sensitive. I'm using it with feelers to measure differences in level and I am regularly needing the 0.05mm feeler to bring the bubble on-scale.
. Thanks for the update, Nealeb I'm glad to know you're happy with it. MichaelG. |
Michael Gilligan | 01/01/2015 21:44:23 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Swarf, Mostly! on 01/01/2015 21:08:03: I'd replace the tube if I could obtain a suitable one - what is members' experience regarding availability of spare tubes? . I haven't yet had need to use them, but Level Developments would be a good place to start. MichaelG. |
Ian L2 | 01/01/2015 22:24:51 |
106 forum posts 11 photos | Posted by Michael Gilligan on 01/01/2015 21:44:23:
Posted by Swarf, Mostly! on 01/01/2015 21:08:03: I'd replace the tube if I could obtain a suitable one - what is members' experience regarding availability of spare tubes? . I haven't yet had need to use them, but Level Developments would be a good place to start. MichaelG. Now there's a thought. after looking at the link above I have a bench drill in my shed not the best thing for accurate drilling as the thing has so many movements drilling anything thicker than 1mm and it's pain to get drill set up to run without being at an angle (its got them pointless stick on bits of tape with 1mm +/- divisions). So if I get some of these vials I can fix them around drill so I can see every thing is ok. |
Nicholas Farr | 01/01/2015 22:54:33 |
![]() 3988 forum posts 1799 photos | Posted by Michael Gilligan on 01/01/2015 19:55:44:
Posted by Douglas Johnston on 01/01/2015 17:40:28:
The level ............................................................. . Doug, That is a very interesting difference, and may help explain why some find 'levelling' easier than others! My guess is that 0.02mm per m is too sensitive for practical use. MichaelG. . P.S ... The build quality of that 0.02 level is what really worries me ... [See Nealeb's description, posted earlier today] It's very easy to make a ridiculously senitive vial [in extremis; a straight tube]; but that doen't guarantee a useful instrument. Hi Michael, I tend to agree, the one I have is not much use for general work, the slightest movement of the floor that you stand on moves the bubble significantly, even leaning more on one foot more than the other and even placing your hand on anything that potenionaly deflects will move the bubble. Below is a photo of each end of the bubble mounting and to my mind the adjusting thread is a little too course to truely set it dead centre when level. It's a long and painstaking job to get it even close, one day I may attempt to replace the adjusting screw and nuts wirth finer ones. Regards Nick. |
Neil Wyatt | 02/01/2015 10:14:01 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | > anyone care to explain if the levels should be observed locally or from a remote? It doesn't matter, the act of measuring will impact on the system, however you do it. Even placing a level on the lathe bed will deflect it... Neil *This is why the Lunar Society met at full moon, at least they could be sure the tidal forces on their experiments were constant. |
Michael Gilligan | 02/01/2015 11:12:26 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Neil Wyatt on 02/01/2015 10:14:01:
*This is why the Lunar Society met at full moon, at least they could be sure the tidal forces on their experiments were constant. . As my old pal Alec used to say: "B***S*** baffles brains" MichaelG. |
Michael Gilligan | 02/01/2015 11:43:39 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Bogstandard2 on 02/01/2015 10:17:54:
I would suspect that in the link shown, because no prices for the vials are shown, then they too have extortionate rates of min. order prices. I hate it when these companies come onto the net advertising their wares and don't give prices, a sure fire way of knowing that they are most probably trying to rip you off. . John, Although are no 'list' prices shown for the ground-tube precision vials; the general purpose ones are priced on the website ... [example] ... and they seem keen to accept enquiries about the others. MichaelG. |
jason udall | 02/01/2015 11:45:40 |
2032 forum posts 41 photos | Re lunar soc. Well there you go. And I always thought it was to have light to get home by. |
Michael Gilligan | 02/01/2015 11:49:46 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by jason udall on 02/01/2015 11:45:40:
Re lunar soc. Well there you go. And I always thought it was to have light to get home by. . That's why I posted my comment. |
Neil Wyatt | 02/01/2015 12:11:08 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | > And I always thought it was to have light to get home by. A vicious rumour spread by their London-based rivals. Neil |
Russell Eberhardt | 02/01/2015 12:41:43 |
![]() 2785 forum posts 87 photos | Posted by Neil Wyatt on 02/01/2015 10:14:01: It doesn't matter, the act of measuring will impact on the system, however you do it. Even placing a level on the lathe bed will deflect it... Careful Neil. We're getting into the realms of quantum physics and heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle! Russell. |
Gordon W | 02/01/2015 16:43:12 |
2011 forum posts | I got a lift to the pub today, again. Talking to a mate who was telling the story about when he was a fully trained machine man. Spent about 2 weeks scraping and leveling a big lathe, put slings on to turn it round and do more work. Set down ready for work and of course it was all out again PS this was true even if no one was looking at it. |
Russell Eberhardt | 02/01/2015 16:55:57 |
![]() 2785 forum posts 87 photos | Posted by Gordon W on 02/01/2015 16:43:12:
PS this was true even if no one was looking at it. Ah but how do you know? Russell. |
Gordon W | 02/01/2015 17:07:31 |
2011 forum posts | Because he told me so, he is and was stone deaf , would the speed of sound change? |
colin hawes | 02/01/2015 17:30:47 |
570 forum posts 18 photos | It seems to me that, in an amateurs workshop, the only important thing is to make sure the bed isn't twisted when bolted down; the quickest way to detect this is with an accurate spirit level across the bed at each end. However this spirit level is used as a comparator so actual calibration is not important. Many lathes, including mine, have never been checked in this way and still turn accurately. It will come as a surprise to many amateurs that a steel bar 1"x2" and 18" long will measurably sag under its own weight so a bar in the lathe can do the same which would indicate that there is no point in being too concerned with extreme levelling precision. Colin |
Michael Gilligan | 02/01/2015 23:04:28 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by colin hawes on 02/01/2015 17:30:47:
It will come as a surprise to many amateurs that a steel bar 1"x2" and 18" long will measurably sag under its own weight so a bar in the lathe can do the same ... . Colin, A the risk of starting another civil war, by the mere mention of his name: It is worth noting that Dr. Georg Schlesinger specifies a Test Mandrel which is hollowed-out, to avoid sag [and was using such mandrels in 1902]. MichaelG. |
Bob Brown 1 | 02/01/2015 23:48:22 |
![]() 1022 forum posts 127 photos | I intend to use a 2" alloy tube, 6mm wall thickness so sag should be less of a problem, but all in all it will depend on how accurate you can measure, me down to probably less than 0.005mm and if you are using a micrometer depends on how good you are getting repeatability. Bob |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.