By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
Forum sponsored by:
Forum sponsored by Forum House Ad Zone

New Nimrods arriving

All Topics | Latest Posts

Search for:  in Thread Title in  
Adam Mara05/02/2020 20:44:13
198 forum posts
1 photos

Nothing new in using American aircraft! My father in law was an upper gunner in a RAF B17 involved in early electronic counter measures in 1944/45. Like many, he would say little about his experiences, the only thing he ever told us that afrer one mission all they found of the rear gunner were his boots. Very brave young men, FIL was only 18, sadly he died quite young, before what they did became public knowledge.

Ady106/02/2020 00:41:51
avatar
6137 forum posts
893 photos

My grannys brother was on bombers from 1939 to 1945

I did the probabilities once

It was like playing russian roulette 36 times in a row

He was the only guy left in his squadron at the end of the war

Never said a word about it, ever

Robert Atkinson 206/02/2020 07:30:50
avatar
1891 forum posts
37 photos

Thread drift alert

What probability did you put on getting shot with a six shot revolver an one round? If it was 6 to 1 against you were wrong. With a conventional revolver, 1 round loaded and held upright the odds of the round being under the hammer when the trigger is pulled are much less than 6 to 1 This is because the single round unbalances the chamber and it will naturally tend to stop at the bottom.

Robert G8RPI.

Mick B106/02/2020 08:49:03
2444 forum posts
139 photos
Posted by Robert Atkinson 2 on 06/02/2020 07:30:50:

Thread drift alert

What probability did you put on getting shot with a six shot revolver an one round? If it was 6 to 1 against you were wrong. With a conventional revolver, 1 round loaded and held upright the odds of the round being under the hammer when the trigger is pulled are much less than 6 to 1 This is because the single round unbalances the chamber and it will naturally tend to stop at the bottom.

Robert G8RPI.

That'll depend on the cartridge and the revolver. A heavily built small-calibre revolver such as (say) a Ruger Single Six or S&W K22 will return odds closer to 6:1 than a lightly-built heavy calibre such as (say) a .455 Webley or .45 Long Colt.

Design of revolvers also forces different techniques, which will again change the odds. Single-action gate-loaders have a half-cock position allowing free cylinder rotation in one direction; swing-outs are usually much more difficult to spin with the cylinder closed and have to be spun when open and snapped shut, as in the Deerhunter film. I can't remember whether or how it can be done with a break-top.

Edited By Mick B1 on 06/02/2020 08:55:34

Edited By Mick B1 on 06/02/2020 09:08:15

Cornish Jack06/02/2020 12:42:46
1228 forum posts
172 photos

Aircrew in the Middle East in the 50s had to carry sidearms plus 6 rounds. My firearms skills were more throwing than firing, so I took 'someone's' advice that I leave the first chamber empty i.e. TWO pulls to fire. Did so for nearly two years before another 'someone' pointed out that we were issued with Colts OR Smith & Wessons ... they rotate in opposite directions! Probably wouldn't have mattered anyway - the ammo was issued from stock manufactured decades earlier and on the first range sessions I needed 11 'pulls' to get the first shot away!! Throwing would have been a good move!

rgds

Bill

daveb06/02/2020 15:19:46
631 forum posts
14 photos
Posted by Robert Atkinson 2 on 06/02/2020 07:30:50:

Thread drift alert

What probability did you put on getting shot with a six shot revolver an one round? If it was 6 to 1 against you were wrong. With a conventional revolver, 1 round loaded and held upright the odds of the round being under the hammer when the trigger is pulled are much less than 6 to 1 This is because the single round unbalances the chamber and it will naturally tend to stop at the bottom.

Robert G8RPI.

If the cylinder spun freely you would be correct but the HAND (the pawl or lever which rotates the cylinder) drags on the ratchet so I would not depend on the loaded chamber being at the bottom

Ady106/02/2020 15:42:06
avatar
6137 forum posts
893 photos
Posted by Robert Atkinson 2 on 06/02/2020 07:30:50:

Thread drift alert

What probability did you put on getting shot with a six shot revolver an one round? If it was 6 to 1 against you were wrong. With a conventional revolver, 1 round loaded and held upright the odds of the round being under the hammer when the trigger is pulled are much less than 6 to 1 This is because the single round unbalances the chamber and it will naturally tend to stop at the bottom.

Robert G8RPI.

Was it The Deerhunter?

They point the gun at the floor so the chamber spins on its axis

Edited By Ady1 on 06/02/2020 15:44:10

Mike Poole06/02/2020 17:01:01
avatar
3676 forum posts
82 photos
Posted by Ady1 on 06/02/2020 00:41:51:

My grannys brother was on bombers from 1939 to 1945

I did the probabilities once

It was like playing russian roulette 36 times in a row

He was the only guy left in his squadron at the end of the war

Never said a word about it, ever

My father was a torpedo bomber pilot which could be mentioned in the same sentence as kamikaze, he survived the whole war. Luckily he was posted to Ceylon in early 1942 which was fairly quiet due to the threat from Japan not really materialising as the Americans kept them busy in the Pacific.

Mike

SillyOldDuffer07/02/2020 14:25:27
10668 forum posts
2415 photos
Posted by Cornish Jack on 06/02/2020 12:42:46:

Aircrew in the Middle East in the 50s had to carry sidearms plus 6 rounds.

...

Throwing would have been a good move!

rgds

Bill

A friend worked in a MoD office in Gibraltar with an excellent high-level view of the straits. Though doing ordinary admin work, the office came with a an ancient tripod mounted brass telescope through which staff logged passing shipping, especially names. At the end of the day the log was loaded into a heavy leather briefcase and handcuffed to whomever had drawn the short-straw for delivering it. The volunteer courier was also required to sport an enormous Victorian Webley revolver, for which there was no ammunition, holster, or training. Apparently this routine started before WW1 when the office was a Naval Intelligence centre, and the gun was added to discourage spies during WW2.

I guess the telescope and civilians remained a useful double-check for other Intelligence, and no-one had bothered to review the need for handcuffs and artillery!

Dave

Neil Wyatt07/02/2020 19:40:52
avatar
19226 forum posts
749 photos
86 articles

It's better to play Beerhunter than Deerhunter...

You shake up one of a six pack, shuffle them and take turns opening them by your ear...

Neil

All Topics | Latest Posts

Please login to post a reply.

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!

Find Model Engineer & Model Engineers' Workshop

Sign up to our Newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.

You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
cowells
Sarik
MERIDIENNE EXHIBITIONS LTD
Subscription Offer

Latest "For Sale" Ads
Latest "Wanted" Ads
Get In Touch!

Do you want to contact the Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop team?

You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.

Click THIS LINK for full contact details.

For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.

Digital Back Issues

Social Media online

'Like' us on Facebook
Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter
 Twitter Logo

Pin us on Pinterest

 

Donate

donate