Brian G | 14/07/2019 09:38:15 |
912 forum posts 40 photos | Posted by RMA on 14/07/2019 08:38:09:
Thanks for the pointers folks, but I'm assuming most of us on here are beyond a certain age and don't use trendy 'language' obviously found to be necessary by the younger population. I certainly don't intend to learn it now, I'll just ignore the posts that contain it! There must be better ways to recapture your youth, another topic maybe for the tea room? Apologies for going off topic. At 60 I guess I am one of the younger population, but wonder how many on this forum actually pre-date these acronyms? Famously "OMG" was used by Admiral Fisher in 1917 (although he helpfully put "Oh! my God" in brackets afterward), FUBAR and SNAFU go back to the 1940s, and RTFM to the late 70s, predating even Usenet and FAQ. Brian |
andrew lyner | 14/07/2019 10:38:10 |
274 forum posts 5 photos | Posted by Nicholas Farr on 14/07/2019 08:30:46:
Posted by RMA on 14/07/2019 08:20:34:
Yep, I understand OK, but what the hell does FIIK mean? **LINK** Hi RMA, notice the wording in brackets, helps to make your own mind up. Regards Nick. In the old days, one would need to phone a friend for such information - or walk over to ones Britannica collection. Nowadays, without getting up from the computer, you can go to Google and type " **** means". I had not come across that particular acronym before (a sheltered life) but the bowdlerised version turned up at the top of the search returns page. IMO, Google rocks for all ages/ |
andrew lyner | 14/07/2019 10:41:37 |
274 forum posts 5 photos | Posted by RMA on 14/07/2019 08:38:09:
Thanks for the pointers folks, but I'm assuming most of us on here are beyond a certain age and don't use trendy 'language' obviously found to be necessary by the younger population. I certainly don't intend to learn it now, I'll just ignore the posts that contain it! There must be better ways to recapture your youth, another topic maybe for the tea room? Apologies for going off topic. That's a shame. Language is a fluid thing and, by ignoring the recent additions, you can miss out on a lot of useful stuff. If TTFN and ITMA mean something to you, then you were part of the new wave of acronyms in the past. Stay in touch; you won't regret it. |
Nicholas Farr | 14/07/2019 12:52:30 |
![]() 3988 forum posts 1799 photos | Hi, here's one for the level in question. NMFP It's not what you're thinking.
Answer; Not Meant For Precision, although there is a more well known answer in some of the work places that I've been into. Regards Nick. |
RMA | 14/07/2019 21:25:34 |
332 forum posts 4 photos | Posted by andrew lyner on 14/07/2019 10:41:37:
Posted by RMA on 14/07/2019 08:38:09:
Thanks for the pointers folks, but I'm assuming most of us on here are beyond a certain age and don't use trendy 'language' obviously found to be necessary by the younger population. I certainly don't intend to learn it now, I'll just ignore the posts that contain it! There must be better ways to recapture your youth, another topic maybe for the tea room? Apologies for going off topic. That's a shame. Language is a fluid thing and, by ignoring the recent additions, you can miss out on a lot of useful stuff. If TTFN and ITMA mean something to you, then you were part of the new wave of acronyms in the past. Stay in touch; you won't regret it. Sorry, I don't regard this as language in the true sense, and if you have to resort to looking up these stupid things on Google, I won't bother. It's just laziness if you only include it once, but I can see the advantage if you're having to repeat it several times so long as it's explained at the beginning! The correct thing to do is to put the meaning in brackets following the acronym so everyone knows what you're on about. Language is all about communication, not research.
|
Michael Gilligan | 14/07/2019 21:40:59 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by RMA on 14/07/2019 21:25:34:
The correct thing to do is to put the meaning in brackets following the acronym so everyone knows what you're on about. Language is all about communication, not research. . In principle, I agree ... but unfortunately, quite a few of these common acronyms contain words which would not [or perhaps should not] be considered appropriate on a 'family friendly' forum. MichaelG. |
andrew lyner | 14/07/2019 23:10:14 |
274 forum posts 5 photos | I'd be interested to know the age at which these things cease to have validity for an individual. I have a feeling that I am by no means the youngest member here and I wonder if it's I who am out of step. I certainly qualify as a grumpy old man. Does acronymophobia kick in when the free TV licence does? Does it kick in at State Pension time - or perhaps when policeman start looking younger? Language is a tool and we all like to use new tools if they do the job. |
Neil Wyatt | 15/07/2019 01:13:37 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | But what does RMA stand for? return Merchandise Authorisation? I'm sure (most) younger readers will struggle as much to know what Dumpy and Cowley levels are*. Neil *Actually don't assume any knowledge of such things fr people of any age, I recently saw a clip from the Onedin Line where the skipper found his position using a theodolite. On its side. Under solid cloud.** **I suppose, at a push, he could have been using it to measure the angular separation of two landmarks, although they appeared far out to sea and there was no evidence of him doing any trig. Edited By Neil Wyatt on 15/07/2019 01:16:20 |
Sam Longley 1 | 15/07/2019 07:29:28 |
965 forum posts 34 photos | Posted by Neil Wyatt on 15/07/2019 01:13:37:
I'm sure (most) younger readers will struggle as much to know what Dumpy and Cowley levels are*. Neil Of course they are antiques now & consigned to the bin.(mine is not, I used it last year) But when Paul used a laser to align his fence & drains he could possibly have used a set of boning rods to far greater effect. My grandfather was using water levels as did his grandfather before him & mine is hanging in the shed. But ask someone how to fill one (they do not work if they have air bubbles in them) -- there is another question for you But should they assume that because it is a " laser" the instrument supplied is adjusted for accuracy in the first place? & just because it is modern it does not always make it the best tool for the job Edited By Sam Longley 1 on 15/07/2019 07:38:49 |
Michael Gilligan | 15/07/2019 08:01:05 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Sam Longley 1 on 15/07/2019 07:29:28:
But should they assume that because it is a " laser" the instrument supplied is adjusted for accuracy in the first place? . Certainly not, Sam But what they can reasonably assume is that [to within 'engineering' standards] the beam is massless and straight ... which is a very good start. The beam will not be particularly well shaped, and will be divergent; but there are 'work-arounds' for these failings. MichaelG.
|
Sam Longley 1 | 15/07/2019 08:03:15 |
965 forum posts 34 photos | But a laser level, which is a very common use for them, could be pointing up in the air (or down)
Edited By Sam Longley 1 on 15/07/2019 08:05:45 |
Michael Gilligan | 15/07/2019 08:13:50 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Sam Longley 1 on 15/07/2019 08:03:15:
But a laser level, which is a very common use for them, could be pointing up in the air (or down) . Yes of course it could, Sam ... That was the point of my first few [emboldened] words ! As with so many cheap modern products, there is something useful inside ... which probably has 'negative value added' tat surrounding it. Consider the potential: A laser module probably costs less than a length of bricklayer's string. MichaelG. |
Blue Heeler | 15/07/2019 08:48:36 |
![]() 342 forum posts | A dictionary is just as useful today as it was 50-100 years ago.
|
RobCox | 15/07/2019 09:17:32 |
82 forum posts 44 photos | Concerning the use of acronyms, we had a case at work where one of my colleagues complained to a customer that their documentation contained too many TLAs that they hadn't defined. Their response was "what's a TLA?". QED Rob |
Michael Gilligan | 15/07/2019 09:34:01 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Blue Heeler on 15/07/2019 08:48:36:
A dictionary is just as useful today as it was 50-100 years ago. . I take your point, but: Personally, I lost faith in 'the dictionary' when they updated the definition of the word "literally" to include the informal usage. I remain a [platonic] lover of old dictionaries. MichaelG. |
Russell Eberhardt | 15/07/2019 09:41:44 |
![]() 2785 forum posts 87 photos | Posted by RMA on 14/07/2019 07:30:22:
I wish posters would refrain from including a group of capital letters in their post which mean absolutely nothing to me! Am I the only one that doesn't understand these things. I'm assuming it's 'text speak', but this isn't texting is it? I don't think it is "text speak". If I remember rightly many of these abbreviations started in the early days of Usenet discussion groups. The use of abbreviations helped when you were using a modem that operated at 1200 b/s downstream and 75 b/s upstream or even a 300 b/s audio coupler. Those were the days Russell |
SillyOldDuffer | 15/07/2019 10:01:40 |
10668 forum posts 2415 photos | Posted by Russell Eberhardt on 15/07/2019 09:41:44:
Posted by RMA on 14/07/2019 07:30:22:
I wish posters would refrain from including a group of capital letters in their post which mean absolutely nothing to me! Am I the only one that doesn't understand these things. I'm assuming it's 'text speak', but this isn't texting is it? I don't think it is "text speak". If I remember rightly many of these abbreviations started in the early days of Usenet discussion groups. The use of abbreviations helped when you were using a modem that operated at 1200 b/s downstream and 75 b/s upstream or even a 300 b/s audio coupler. Those were the days Russell Mention of 300 baud modems reminded me of a gross example from my guilty past. We did it as a joke, but my career in computing included a time where we would use ASCII control codes in normal conversation. For example: Question. Fancy a coffee? In American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII), Hexadecimal 15 is the control code for 'Negative Acknowledge'. Only elite members of the inner sanctum know that! For reasons not understood by us young nerds, management were displeased when customers complained. Quite hard for chaps who fought at Alamein asking if their job was finished to be told 'NAK NAK NAK' by a spotty long-haired youth with a failed Zapata moustache, loon pants, psychedelic nylon shirt, and a smelly Afghan coat. Dave |
Neil Wyatt | 15/07/2019 10:03:22 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | I posted this in the 'Aircraft Radio Scanner' thread - with my tongue in my cheek I got a USB (Universal Serial Bus) SDR (software defined radio) for my laptop PC (personal computer). It cost about 16UKP (United Kingdom Pounds). I use it for meteor detection using RADAR (Radio Detection And Ranging) scatter with free software, but it will pick up almost anything you can make an aerial for, and you can switch it between FM (Frequency modulation), AM (amplitude modulation), USB (upper side band) and LSB (lower side band) or even stereo FM. As SOD (Silly Old Duffer) says, this is a really cheap and easy way to experiment. Neil
|
Frank Gorse | 15/07/2019 10:12:45 |
104 forum posts | Neil,that sounds like a pelorus,a simple horizontal protractor with a sight that is probably still fitted on ships today. Anything which relies on a spirit level is of limited use at sea but the horizontal angle between two known points will give you ‘distance off’,add a third point and you have a position fix. The same thing can be done with a sextant used on its side. No trig required,just a couple of lines on the chart but as you say you do need to be able to see the coast.
|
Sam Longley 1 | 15/07/2019 16:45:58 |
965 forum posts 34 photos | A Horizontal angle on its own will not give you distance off because it will subtend an arc which could be any distance from the shore dependent on the length of either leg. You need a compass to determine the direction of the legs. In which case the sextant is not required. Without the compass bearing you would not know where to draw the lines. However, Charts show the height of light houses which gives the third dimension of your triangle for distance off if you take the angle vertically. You need to be able to see the base & know the height of tide then you can calculate the distance to the object That is unless you know the dipping distance, in which case the vertical angle is irrelevant. But you still need to know the bearing from the light to get a position fix within a reasonable estimate. The "dipping distance" is the distance at which the light appears to drop below the horizon.Add to that, the dipping distance of the observers eye above the waterline & you have an approx distance off. Better still if you have GPS & it is not being jammed Edited By Sam Longley 1 on 15/07/2019 16:47:42 |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.