Is a separate drive for the lathe cross-feed worth the extra money?
Jerry Wray | 25/08/2013 19:13:47 |
84 forum posts 4 photos | I am looking to buy a new lathe, perhaps the Warco WM 280V-F or the smaller 250 or their equivalents from other supplers.
The 280 has separate drives for the cross-slide but the 250 take its drive from the leadscrew. Do others have views on whether paying the exrta cost is worth while?
Jerry |
Andrew Johnston | 25/08/2013 22:04:58 |
![]() 7061 forum posts 719 photos | When I was looking for my main centre lathe a separate power feed drive shaft, and cross feed, were both on the 'essential' list. I bought secondhand, so the cost factor wasn't so much of an issue. Regards, Andrew |
mechman48 | 25/08/2013 23:23:27 |
![]() 2947 forum posts 468 photos | Jerry If you can afford it get the 280/290V-F I've got the 250 & it's fine for my needs,I don't have any probs selecting between saddle & cross feeds. IIRC these weren't available in their present form when I bought mine..or else I totally missed / didn't see them at Harrogate last year, plus budget constraints. Cheers George Edited By mechman48 on 25/08/2013 23:24:18 |
Thor 🇳🇴 | 26/08/2013 06:40:38 |
![]() 1766 forum posts 46 photos | Hi Jerry, I agree with George, get the 280/290. In addition to a separate feedshaft and leadscrew, the bed of the 280/290 is much wider than the 250. The 290 also has a larger bore (38mm). Thor |
JasonB | 26/08/2013 07:34:13 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | The 280 has always had the two shafts, mine is about 4yrs old now and was one of the first Warco had. J |
Jerry Wray | 26/08/2013 07:36:15 |
84 forum posts 4 photos | Thank you to the posters who have replied with their experiences and comments. I must admit that you have confirmed what I had already almost decided upon. It's always good to get your own conclusions reinforced. Looks like I shall have to work how to get a machine of this weight up;to bench height now.
Thank you Jerry
|
mechman48 | 26/08/2013 09:04:24 |
![]() 2947 forum posts 468 photos | Jerry Do you kow any one with a engine hoist, or you could hire one for a day? I bought one VAT free from M/Mart as I had to move my other machine about while I converted my garage, managed on my own to lift Lathe & mill onto stands without too much hassle... or do you know a rugby team near you George |
JasonB | 26/08/2013 09:16:10 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | I used an engine hoist crane from the local hire shop to get mine onto the stand. Also stripped it of excess weight, Just wind the carrage to the tailstock end to help balance
Edited By JasonB on 26/08/2013 09:17:30 |
mechman48 | 26/08/2013 09:38:40 |
![]() 2947 forum posts 468 photos |
Just required a little help with the lathe from SWMBO... George |
Jerry Wray | 26/08/2013 10:09:47 |
84 forum posts 4 photos | Mechman, Jason, Thanks for more suggestions, I have a 1 tonne chain hoist and my garage was built with rafters which are actually floor joists so sghould be capable of taking the 230kg weight, but I am not sure if that would be steady enough, and of course its not manoeverable. Seems like an engine hoist is favourite, I can hire one locally for about £35 a day. That's insignificant against the cost of the lathe. I'm admiring how level your workshop floors are! Mine is level overall but it's a typical builders surface of the eighties; concrete laid and levelled with a board on edge, so small ridges. Perhaps self-levelling compound in that area, or large feet on the stand. Looks like I'll have to be on the phone to Warco tomorrow! Thanks again Jerry
|
Bazyle | 26/08/2013 10:33:55 |
![]() 6956 forum posts 229 photos | Some of the above didn't quite address the original question so I shall deviate too. Power cross feed as opposed to longitudinal feed may not be used much so might not be bought by hobbyists if it was an optional add on at £100. Once designers had worked out how to build it in easily it became like electric windows in cars - £10 to fit no options and add £100 to the price, The 280 does not have a separate drive motor for it just a clutch off the main drive shaft. It would be much better nowadays to provide it using a separate motor and especially a stepper to take it part way towards a CNC fit but you don't get an option for not having it - it's an 'electric window' above a certain size fo lathe. The separate drive shaft is a different question. Very small lathes use only the leadscrew for both screwcutting and power longitudinal feed so not so good for wear (though perfectly adequate for hobbyists really). So finally if you buy your cars based on the way the windows whizz up and down you should have power cross feed figure in your selection of a lathe. Otherwise all the other aspects are more important and you will probably get it thrown in for 'free' anyway. |
mechman48 | 26/08/2013 10:34:04 |
![]() 2947 forum posts 468 photos | Warco do two versions of feet for your machine stand... item # 5560A - 60mm dia. & 5561A - 80 mm dia. @ £4.60 ea.. I have the 5561A size for my mill stand which has given me an extra 2" in height, the stands tend to be on the short side so if you're 6' 12" you'll have backache, seem to be made for the chinese height. I'm a short a***e myself but still really need to have the extra couple of inches... (ooooooh you are awful! G |
Russell Eberhardt | 26/08/2013 11:02:48 |
![]() 2785 forum posts 87 photos | Couldn't agree more with you Bazyle. I have had a lathe with power crossfeed for about 20 years and I don't suppose I've used it more than half a dozen times. Once for skimming the faceplate and a few times for making chuck backplates. Useful for big facing jobs but (for me) they are few and far between. Russell. |
John Haine | 26/08/2013 13:55:38 |
5563 forum posts 322 photos | PXF - essential! Apart from smooth and easy facing cuts, I think it is George Thomas who recommends in his articles on a rear parting tool holder that PXF should be used for parting to ensure a slow and steady feed. Since reading that, and having a rear tool post, I have always used it and never had a jam. Also works fine with the inserted-bit tct parting blades in the front tool holder. |
JasonB | 26/08/2013 13:59:15 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | Strange, I use mine every time I use the lathe and would not be without it now Oh and the 280 does not use a clutch to engage the feed, just a gearbox with forward, neutral or reverse. |
Russell Eberhardt | 26/08/2013 15:35:09 |
![]() 2785 forum posts 87 photos | mmm.. never tried it for parting. Must give it a go. Russell. |
mechman48 | 26/08/2013 16:53:15 |
![]() 2947 forum posts 468 photos | Jerry Don't be fooled by my garage floor, it still has the original taper(run off) as built, its just that the floor paint (garage floor paint) is fairly thick so making it look smooth, (photos decieving & all that) what I did was to lay a thin pad of leveling compound where the lathe & the mill stand so they would both have a reasonable level base to sit on, the remainder is as is. I put the feet I bought under the mill stand & levelled that off to bubble & digi level, plus giving me the extra 2"... George. |
Jerry Wray | 26/08/2013 19:25:16 |
84 forum posts 4 photos | Thank you all for your contributions. Things are becoming clearer. It's great to see that, so far, no-one has said anything against these larger Warco machines. This morning the Devil took me over, the 290 had been mentioned so I spent some time considering the pros and cons of that. It's just about within reach of my budget, but I cannot really see me using DRO and the 5MT headstock taper suddenly made me realise I was getting into a fair sized machine. I have been involved in a machine shop where big items (jet engine casings) rule the roost. and that seems to be getting me into everyday work. Added to which I can see how the temptation towards machining centres, G-code, Solidworks, high speed horizontal boring, etc. etc. comes about. This is supposed to be a hobby after-all, part of the 'fun' is using manual techniques to achieve results. Just pressing a button and letting the machine get on with it is not for me. So having weighed everything that has been said I have, subject to a good night's sleep, settled on the 280 V-F. Jerry |
OuBallie | 27/08/2013 14:37:49 |
![]() 1181 forum posts 669 photos | Power crossfeed when parting off every time, after manual feed to knock off the high spots. The Q-Tip makes parting off a pleasure now, having given up years ago after far too many dig-ins, busted blades et al. Geoff - Getting over a bad patch after treatment. |
Andrew Johnston | 27/08/2013 15:56:24 |
![]() 7061 forum posts 719 photos | Posted by Jerry Wray on 26/08/2013 19:25:16:
This is supposed to be a hobby after-all, part of the 'fun' is using manual techniques to achieve results. Just pressing a button and letting the machine get on with it is not for me. Surely that's exactly what powerfeed is; push the button and let the machine do the work. Andrew PS: I use my power crossfeed almost every time I do a facing cut, as well as for parting off. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.