An unusual tool
John McNamara | 19/02/2019 14:59:09 |
![]() 1377 forum posts 133 photos | Hi All Video Link Regards Edited By John McNamara on 19/02/2019 15:02:11 |
Michael Gilligan | 19/02/2019 19:16:50 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Thanks for the link, John An interesting idea ! MichaelG. |
mark costello 1 | 19/02/2019 20:58:50 |
![]() 800 forum posts 16 photos | EXCELLENT! |
Nick Hulme | 19/02/2019 23:02:12 |
750 forum posts 37 photos | It's a significant geometrical compromise and not a very clever way to use a dual taper collet.
|
Michael Gilligan | 19/02/2019 23:44:34 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Nick Hulme on 19/02/2019 23:02:12:
It's a significant geometrical compromise and not a very clever way to use a dual taper collet. . Admittedly, ignoring the front taper is a novel way to use a dual taper collet ... I wonder what the internal profile of the soft jaws might be. It does, however, seem a neat way of holding thin tubes in a hefty 3-jaw. MichaelG. |
John McNamara | 19/02/2019 23:50:10 |
![]() 1377 forum posts 133 photos | I beg to differ.
|
Michael Gilligan | 20/02/2019 00:08:52 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by John McNamara on 19/02/2019 23:50:10:
I beg to differ. ... hopefully from Nick, not me
MichaelG. |
John McNamara | 20/02/2019 00:25:39 |
![]() 1377 forum posts 133 photos | Yes Michael I was responding to Nick. |
Paul Lousick | 20/02/2019 01:26:25 |
2276 forum posts 801 photos | Holding something in a collet has normally been more accurate than using a 3-jaw chuck. This a 3-jaw holding a collet. How accurate is that ? Paul. |
Neil Lickfold | 20/02/2019 06:28:11 |
1025 forum posts 204 photos | Hey John, I like it. That is quite a trick setup , especially the fact that the chuck has a limit on the opening. As for accuracy I am sure it is better than 0.01mm if the collet is a precision collet. For it's application with full contact engagement in the collet looks really good to me. It would also lend itself to the use of distortion collets as well. Very interesting. I might have to make up a set of jaws to allow this to happen. Neil |
JasonB | 20/02/2019 07:04:15 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | Michael if you follow John Mc's link to teh FB page you can see the jaws have a tapered cone turned into them and small lip to retain collet via it's groove. Like Nick I wonder how that can apply an even force all around the collet rather than just give 3 points of contact which would be more so the further the collet was closed down. At best it spreads the load more than using standard 3-jaws and saves having to make dedicated soft jaws for each size. Edited By JasonB on 20/02/2019 07:26:23 |
Michael Gilligan | 20/02/2019 07:53:19 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by JasonB on 20/02/2019 07:04:15:
Michael if you follow John Mc's link to teh FB page you can see the jaws have a tapered cone turned into them and small lip to retain collet via it's groove. . I avoid FaceBook as much as possible ... but that ^^^ is exactly what I surmised when responding to Nick. MichaelG. |
JasonB | 20/02/2019 08:05:57 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | Posted by John McNamara on 19/02/2019 23:50:10:
I beg to differ. Reading some of the comments and replies he says "it is important that the jaws are machined to the collets CLOSED size" so unless you are only holding work at the upper end of the collets range you would need a rebore of the jaws every time eg if holding 1/4" stock in a 7mm collet so can't see that being any quicker or easier than machining soft jaws. |
Mike Poole | 20/02/2019 08:24:43 |
![]() 3676 forum posts 82 photos | It sounds as though this works but in very qualified situation for a very specific purpose. This is not an alternative ER chuck but a special purpose tool utilising an ER collet. Worth filing for reference and may be a seed for other applications. Interesting. Mike |
Martin Kyte | 20/02/2019 08:37:29 |
![]() 3445 forum posts 62 photos | Looks like it would be optimum for a fixed diameter only. regards Martin |
Martin Kyte | 20/02/2019 08:47:33 |
![]() 3445 forum posts 62 photos | Are the jaws air operated ? Martin |
Neil Wyatt | 20/02/2019 08:49:43 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | My thoughts are: For small bore collets which are counterbored, ideally you need more compression at the front. It prioritises convenience over accuracy. On my lathes changing chucks takes about as long as changing jaws, but that may not be the case for this hefty machine with six mounting screws. Neil |
JasonB | 20/02/2019 08:55:01 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | Again if you read the link he says changing the 3-jaw to a collet chuck takes a long time so quicker for him to swap jaws. |
Martin Kyte | 20/02/2019 09:15:20 |
![]() 3445 forum posts 62 photos | I think if you have a cnc machine with an air operated 3 jaw chuck then with the addition of 3 special jaws you have an adaptor to take the full range of ER collets and can safely hold thin walled tube. Not a bad result for not much outlay. regards Martin |
jann west | 20/02/2019 09:40:44 |
106 forum posts | also worth noting that this setup would allow the easy integration of a depth stop through the back-end of the headstock spindle ... something typically considered an advantage of the 5c over the ER collet. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.