Vic | 05/08/2017 16:10:24 |
3453 forum posts 23 photos | What do you use for edge finding? |
JasonB | 05/08/2017 16:14:42 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | Edge finder I use an electrinic PEC one rather than a wobbly one. |
Thor 🇳🇴 | 05/08/2017 16:15:13 |
![]() 1766 forum posts 46 photos | One of these (type (D). Thor |
John Haine | 05/08/2017 17:10:40 |
5563 forum posts 322 photos | I have a home made electronic one which either connects to the probe input of my CNC mill controller for auto aligning or I use it with a multimeter on the smallest ohms range which also has a buzzer function. I also have a couple of mechanical ones, which one I pick up tends to depend on what size collet is in the mill. |
Neil Wyatt | 05/08/2017 17:29:05 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | An old fashioned cylinder on a wiggly stick edge finder. |
mike T | 05/08/2017 17:34:51 |
221 forum posts 1 photos | Jason, What is the diameter of the shank on your PEC edge finder? I have ER25 collets and the biggest collet is 16mm. Mike |
Andrew Johnston | 05/08/2017 17:49:03 |
![]() 7061 forum posts 719 photos | Somewhere I've got a wiggler set, but don't use it. For non-accurate stuff I just line the tool up on the edge by eye. For quick 'n' dirty alignment I use a fag paper, lightly trapping it between tool and work. For accurate alignment I use this: And for centring on round features this: Andrew |
JasonB | 05/08/2017 18:21:35 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | Mike, it is 1/2" shank with a 0.200" tip fits my 1/2" ER32 collet. |
mike T | 05/08/2017 18:29:27 |
221 forum posts 1 photos | Thanks Jason, It should also fit an ER 25 collet. The part number looks like 4200-5??????. Did you order it from a UK source? I always get hit with extra import duty when I order direct from the USA. Makes things expensive thanks Mike |
Brian H | 05/08/2017 18:32:17 |
![]() 2312 forum posts 112 photos | I use one of these from Starrett Brian |
JasonB | 05/08/2017 18:33:16 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | I got mine from J&L here in the UK but they now trade as MSC. They don't show that particular model now but have a couple of ball ended ones, the smaller of the two is the same size. Will check the model No of mine but looks like 5200 = .500" shank, 0.200" tip
Edit. Quick google for PEC edge finder brings up several options in the UK such as this, bit cheaper than Andrews jobbie which they also sell
Edited By JasonB on 05/08/2017 18:39:17 |
Enough! | 05/08/2017 18:35:27 |
1719 forum posts 1 photos | I used the same general type as Jason for several years. The problem (with mine at least) was that the tip had no compliance and eventually I ran it hard onto the side of a part (accidentally of course). I never quite trusted it after that. Eventually, I bought one of the types with a spring loaded 10mm ball at the end which doesn't really care if you run it into a part. It also has an audible contact signal as well as visual which my other one didn't. The problem with this kind in your case though, is that it has a 20mm shank and you need an ER32 collet setup to use it ... it was one of the reasons I decided to switch to ER32 (from ER25) on my mill. As far as I know they don't come any smaller. |
Howard Lewis | 05/08/2017 19:25:38 |
7227 forum posts 21 photos | My Soba wiggler purports to have a 0.250" ball. Mine has a 6mm! But the 0.050" cylinder is 0.050 O K once you find out but mystifying errors until you do. Howard |
mike T | 05/08/2017 19:51:23 |
221 forum posts 1 photos | Jason and Bander...... Not sure about an edge finder tip with no compliance. Maybe OK with a manual machine where you can feel some resistance. but with a CNC machine there is no such feel, so you could easily make one or two steps too many and before you know it there is a 25Kg side load applied to you shiny new probe. I think I will probably stick with my faithful old cylindrical wobbler for the time being. Mike |
John Haine | 05/08/2017 20:01:42 |
5563 forum posts 322 photos | Posted by mike T on 05/08/2017 19:51:23:
Jason and Bander...... Not sure about an edge finder tip with no compliance. Maybe OK with a manual machine where you can feel some resistance. but with a CNC machine there is no such feel, so you could easily make one or two steps too many and before you know it there is a 25Kg side load applied to you shiny new probe. I think I will probably stick with my faithful old cylindrical wobbler for the time being. Mike Really it's the other way round. If the electronic one is linked to the CNC controller, using Mach3 there are probe routines that allow you to advance the probe slowly using small steps towards the edge with a tight loop in the software which stops the feed instantly once the probe is triggered. My edge finder is essentially a cylinder with an isolated ring at the end of known diameter and concentric with the shank (all machined at the same setting) and the ring gets grounded when it's edge touches the workpiece edge. I think the "touch" is much gentler than you can routinely achieve manually. It works extremely well. The alternative is to have a "touch trigger" type probe for which there are a number of home-brew designs around based on the original Renishaw type. These detect the touch point very accurately but allow safe over-travel. |
mike T | 05/08/2017 21:25:26 |
221 forum posts 1 photos | John, Thanks for that information. I was hoping that Jason's PEC edge finder was based on the Renishaw style of probe.rather than a rigid probe. I will follow up your leads and look into the various DIY touch trigger probes and how they can connect into LinuxCNC Thanks Mike |
Vic | 05/08/2017 22:39:35 |
3453 forum posts 23 photos | I would expect the Starrett wiggler shown by Brian above is imperial but does anyone know if there are metric versions? |
Clive Foster | 05/08/2017 22:52:26 |
3630 forum posts 128 photos | Like Andrew i have a Hamier 3D Taster for really accurate alignment but for normal duties I use the Huffam version of the Starrett wiggler set in Brian's picture. Have both metric and imperial versions which avoids conversion errors or, more correctly, forgetting to switch the DRO system back after using an imperial wiggler on a metric job or vicky versa. The Huffam set only has ball and cylinder probes so in a sense its less versatile than the Starrett set. But the pivot bearing uses a spring loaded nylon pusher to apply constant, light, pre-load making it more sensitive than the more common Starrett and no name knock off types. Getting down towards ± a teeth of a thou or so if you are careful the machine adequately tight and the surface finish on the target decent. Since getting the Huffams the Hamier barely gets used. It needs to be pretty picky job for the Hamiers better performance to show. Picked up a no-name version of the Starrett set with my first mill years ago. Its OK but the ball in a collet pivot isn't really reliable below ± a thou or two. Fiddling about with the collet adjustment can help matters but life is too short. I keep it for the needle point. Short of proper spindle mount optical or camera system its the bees thingies for picking up intersecting lines and centre pop marks. Pivot stiffness is an advantage there. Clive. |
John Haine | 06/08/2017 00:02:43 |
5563 forum posts 322 photos | Mike T, here is one example. |
Andrew Entwistle | 06/08/2017 00:05:39 |
![]() 120 forum posts 218 photos | Hi Mike, You may have already found this very similar thread from 2012 **LINK** I have just finished making a Renishaw type touch probe that is a combination of the Shaun Wainright and Wildhorse Innovations designs (see my album): I cheated and bought the M2 ruby stylus direct from Renishaw (about £20). If you are interested in the design I think it is possible for me make the Fusion 360 files public. Andrew. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.