paul rayner | 10/07/2017 21:55:13 |
187 forum posts 46 photos |
Hi All As you can see I have a rather large inclusion on the port face of this casting. Unfortunatly I am unable to send it back. Do I either a) do nothing as it may not interfere with the performance? b) fill it with JB weld? c) plug it with cast iron? the last option as I see it is probebly the best but i'm reluctant to do this (I'm still a bit of a novice). What are your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance for all replys. regards Paul |
Neil Wyatt | 10/07/2017 22:09:35 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | As its a bearing surface, I'd probably plug it, but using brass or gunmetal. That said, it looks like a stationary engine cylinder, not a loco cylinder so it may never work hard and JB weld will probably to the job - choose the original, slow setting flavour. Neil |
paul rayner | 10/07/2017 22:18:13 |
187 forum posts 46 photos | Hi Neil Yes it is a stationary engine cylinder. Why would you use brass or gunmetal and not the parent metal to plug it?? regards Paul |
Neil Wyatt | 10/07/2017 22:28:14 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | It's much easier to make a small plug out of brass than cast iron, especially if you want to thread it. Neil |
paul rayner | 10/07/2017 22:37:44 |
187 forum posts 46 photos | ahh I see. I never thought about threading it. I was thinking of sticking it in with JB weld. thanks for reply regards paul |
duncan webster | 10/07/2017 22:49:14 |
5307 forum posts 83 photos | It doesn't encroach on the ports, there looks to be room to make a seal on the valve chest. If it's blind live with it Edited By duncan webster on 10/07/2017 22:49:37 |
Nick_G | 10/07/2017 22:56:24 |
![]() 1808 forum posts 744 photos | . Just being curious but why can you not send it back.? Nick |
Hacksaw | 10/07/2017 22:57:10 |
474 forum posts 202 photos | Shame. If it was a racing two stroke, it would be called an auxiliary port |
paul rayner | 10/07/2017 23:05:04 |
187 forum posts 46 photos | Hi Nick I bought it as a set of castings from the doncaster show they had a few all the same from a workshop clearance. It is very very similar to stuart turners victoria. I'm actually using the plans with quite a few tweaks here and there. must admit its been a bit of a head scratcher so far as I said before i'm still a novice finding my feet. Paul |
Nick_G | 10/07/2017 23:14:02 |
![]() 1808 forum posts 744 photos | . So are you saying it's not a casting of Stuarts.? Nick |
Maurice | 10/07/2017 23:24:28 |
469 forum posts 50 photos | I had an old Stuart No.1 that I was restoring. This had very poor ports, and an inclusion right next to a port. I don't know how it ever ran. After taking some advice, I milled the whole port area away to a depth of about an eighth of an inch then fitted a plate of cast iron (a spare steam chest cover) in the excavation with epoxy resin: then milled new ports. Worked very well. |
vintagengineer | 10/07/2017 23:30:52 |
![]() 469 forum posts 6 photos | You could braze or silver solder it up and re-machine. I had T13 Bugatti inlet port on the block, when I filled the radiator up water poured out of the carburetor!
|
Stewart Hart | 11/07/2017 05:50:48 |
![]() 674 forum posts 357 photos | Just cover the complete port face with a brass or bronze plate with the ports cut in it, this a perfectly acceptable way of working some designs use this method, Tubal Cains Beam Engine Mary was designed using this method. Stew
|
mechman48 | 11/07/2017 07:17:32 |
![]() 2947 forum posts 468 photos | For future ref... I had an inclusion fault with my S10V, similar to the above, what I did was to use cast iron filings mixed with 2 part epoxy resin to plug the inclusion, worked fine. I had earlier decided to collect & keep CI filings in a tin with thought 'just in case' in mind, usually when I've filed the flashings of castings, these tend to produce fine CI dust so easily mixes with any binding media. I've done the same with brass filings. |
JasonB | 11/07/2017 07:50:23 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | If the void in the underside of the valve will move over the hole which it looks like it may do then you could get steam/air escaping down the exhaust. Can't see the exact shape of the hole but if it is just half an egg shape then it is going to get smaller as you machine the port face so may clear the valve. I would do as Stew says and machine up a thin piece of CI about 1mm thick, cut the ports in that and retain with a couple of CSK screws that fall under the steam chest edges, smear of JBWeld or Araldite to seal. Steam chest studs will hold it firmly in place on assembly |
paul rayner | 11/07/2017 14:59:23 |
187 forum posts 46 photos | Thank you all for all your reply's. I think I'm going to try and make the cavity in the valve smaller and see how I get on with that. I'ts a great idea of stew and Jason B but i'm not confident enough to cut a 1mm slice. the cavity is indeed egg shaped and is about 4mm deep. I will keep you informed of how I get on. thank you all once again. Paul |
Neil Wyatt | 11/07/2017 16:49:05 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | The point that the valve will seal on the surrounding metal is a good one, if you fill with JB Weld it shouldn't wear into a low spot. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.