By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
Forum sponsored by:
Forum sponsored by Forum House Ad Zone

Why is the pilot diameter of a counterbore so large?

All Topics | Latest Posts

Search for:  in Thread Title in  
Thomas Staubo03/02/2017 11:28:01
avatar
54 forum posts

I just checked my M5 counterbore. It has a 4.2mm pilot, and a 10mm cutter diameter. Go figure! frown

It's stamped M5 10 4.2 on the skank, so it's not altered just made for a special purpose.

My first thought is that it's for counterboring a threaded hole, but why would you do that!?

Neil Wyatt03/02/2017 11:40:09
avatar
19226 forum posts
749 photos
86 articles
Posted by Thomas Staubo on 03/02/2017 11:28:01:

I just checked my M5 counterbore. It has a 4.2mm pilot, and a 10mm cutter diameter. Go figure! frown

It's stamped M5 10 4.2 on the skank, so it's not altered just made for a special purpose.

My first thought is that it's for counterboring a threaded hole, but why would you do that!?

For making the counterbore before you tap M5 fine.

Ian P03/02/2017 11:43:32
avatar
2747 forum posts
123 photos

Well as its the tapping drill size for M5 I suppose its possible to counterbore whilst say a cover whilst it is in place, then do the threading and cover clearance hole later, but the 10mm diameter still does not make sense.for a caphead.

Maybe these counterbores are not intended for capheads? I have just measured an M5 Pan head fixing and its 9.65mm OD so would be a nice fit in the 10mm hole.

Ian P

Brad Amos03/02/2017 13:06:31
19 forum posts
7 photos

Thanks, Locoman,

Your message made me wonder if I could get a neater result by substituting imperial counterbores for the metric ones. Here are my calculations, giving first the metric screw size and maximum recommended cap diameter for a socket cap screw, then the nearest imperial screw size, imperial counterbore designation and diameter of counterbore in millimetres, and finally the clearing drill recommended for normal and close tolerances with the imperial counterbore tool.

M3 5.5mm cap Imp screw #4 Cbore diam. 5.56mm (7/32) clearance 3.2mm (close), 3.45mm (standard)

M4 7.0mm cap Imp screw #6 Cbore diam. 7.14mm (9/32) clearance 3.9-4.3 mm

M5 8.5 mm cap Imp screw #10 Cbore diam. 9.52mm (3/8) clearance 5.2-5.6 mm

M6 10 mm cap Imp screw 1/4" Cbore diam. 11mm clearance 6.8-7.2mm

I got my figures for maximum metric screw head sizes from roymech.co.uk, my US hole and counterbore sizes from rorty.net/holes-and-counterbore-sizes and I converted the US drill sizes using CSGnetwork.com drill size conversions. Before I spend money on any imperial counterbores I would be most grateful to hear from anyone who has tried these substitutions with metric cap head screws. I am very reluctant to let imperial units into my workshop, but the calculations suggest that these counterbores might be worth trying, using the normal clearance drills recommended for the metric screws in my Zeus tables.

JasonB03/02/2017 13:19:33
avatar
25215 forum posts
3105 photos
1 articles

M3 into 5.5 will go though I counterbored these with a reground drill with almost a flat end and no pilot, clearance hole is 3.0

Gordon W03/02/2017 16:09:34
2011 forum posts

Of course you may need a counterbore for a hex head and a socket, not just for hex drive keys.

JasonB03/02/2017 16:13:16
avatar
25215 forum posts
3105 photos
1 articles
Posted by Gordon W on 03/02/2017 16:09:34:

Of course you may need a counterbore for a hex head and a socket, not just for hex drive keys.

I don't followquestion

HOWARDT03/02/2017 17:15:49
1081 forum posts
39 photos

He means a hex head as in bolt. Yes there are standards for those, and clearances for spanners.

Mikelkie03/02/2017 17:27:32
avatar
135 forum posts
13 photos

And why is the shank of live centres so short? one always has to insert something into the sleeve for the drift

to get to itangry 2

HOWARDT03/02/2017 18:37:06
1081 forum posts
39 photos

If it is a morse taper and you use a drift it should have a tang. Different drift for larger tapers.

Ian P03/02/2017 19:19:17
avatar
2747 forum posts
123 photos
Posted by HOWARDT on 03/02/2017 18:37:06:

If it is a morse taper and you use a drift it should have a tang. Different drift for larger tapers.

Howard

No 'should' about it. Some tooling with MT shanks have tangs, some don't.

I have never see a revolving centre with a tang.

Ian P

loco man03/02/2017 22:04:19
10 forum posts

I believe that Mike Poole made a very accurate comment re the huge size of the original Whitworth size heads. After those standards were set it - and possibly late 1939 - early 1940? - it seems as though there was a re-think and sizes were dropped - for instance the hex size of a 5/16 BSW bolt hexagon dropped down to the size of a 1/4" head size. Along with the introduction of BSF - ie British Standard Fine threads. Maybe this was why the dual marking of some spanners was introduced - for instance - 3/16"BSW / 1/4"BSF.

Some of the older fitters that I worked with used to refer to the down-sizing of hexagon dimensions as 'war standards' -- maybe a way of conserving / making better use of steel supplies??

Maybe someone else has some more accurate information over the change - I await with interest.

Ian

Neil Wyatt05/02/2017 18:41:56
avatar
19226 forum posts
749 photos
86 articles
Posted by loco man on 03/02/2017 22:04:19:

Some of the older fitters that I worked with used to refer to the down-sizing of hexagon dimensions as 'war standards' -- maybe a way of conserving / making better use of steel supplies??

It was indeed a way of conserving steel - and speeding up production.

Consider that many fixings will have been turned from hex bar.

Neil

Tim Stevens05/02/2017 21:39:25
avatar
1779 forum posts
1 photos

A little bit of history:

BSF was in regular use before 1910 - I have before me a book from 1907-8 with a table of sizes from 1/4 to 6 inches. Oddly, the 1/4 BSF has 25 tpi - although this may be a typesetting error.

The head sizes for finished bolts and nuts are;

1/4 - 33/64

5/16 - 19/32

3/8 - 45/64 etc.

You might like to compare these sizes with the modern accepted decimal dimensions of Whitworth spanners.

And I suggest that one reason for a large diameter of countersink was because they are intended for use with cheese heads, or fillister, or round, or hexagon heads. It may be that there is a Standard in existence that has not been updated to suit socket head screws. What are commonly called 'Allen Screws' were very rare until about WWII - and are referred to as hexagon socket head cap screws. My understanding of the term 'cap screw' refers to the use of the screw to hold the cylinder head or cap on a steam cylinder.

I'm don't mind anyone raising an objection to my comments, especially if they can add more up to date or accurate facts, but I would be obliged if I could be told of any deletions of my contributions in future. Thanks.

Tim

Wayne Ward05/02/2017 21:59:05
12 forum posts
I'd always recommend a chamfer at the entry to a screw clearance hole. If the underhead radius interferes with a sharp edge, you will damage that critical fillet and possibly find the head falling off your screw when you would really prefer it not to. I speak from experience here as a design engineer rather than as a machinist. Having too tight a clearance hole is asking for trouble when a hole pattern is concerned. You can't be sure of holding the position of a tapped hole to much better than within a diameter of 0.25 or 0.3mm of true position and even with accurate machining of the set of clearance holes, you will probably have some interference with the underhead fillets. It's possibly not a worry with relatively unstressed applications, but if you have something with a lot of cyclic stresses, this short of thing can catch you out. Small clearances don't do much for you as your screw holes won't be good enough to provide accurate and predictable location. You would do better to rely on dowels, spigots etc, or possibly shoulder screws to locate.
HOWARDT05/02/2017 23:40:19
1081 forum posts
39 photos

Morse tapers without tangs are driven out of a taper by striking the small end down its length, or driven out by a retracting tail stock. Morse tapers with tangs are driven out with a drift. That is ow I were taut, otherwise damage will occur.

Nick Hulme06/02/2017 00:05:40
750 forum posts
37 photos

I have a set which consists of an arbour with interchangeable cutters and pilots.

All Topics | Latest Posts

Please login to post a reply.

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!

Find Model Engineer & Model Engineers' Workshop

Sign up to our Newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.

You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
cowells
Sarik
MERIDIENNE EXHIBITIONS LTD
Subscription Offer

Latest "For Sale" Ads
Latest "Wanted" Ads
Get In Touch!

Do you want to contact the Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop team?

You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.

Click THIS LINK for full contact details.

For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.

Digital Back Issues

Social Media online

'Like' us on Facebook
Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter
 Twitter Logo

Pin us on Pinterest

 

Donate

donate