jason udall | 01/11/2014 18:48:30 |
2032 forum posts 41 photos | THIN Oil films on water are often in the order of wavelength of light..maybe 100nm. Thats 0.1 micron...well within the range of " precision" of slips. .(??) About 4 micro inches... How smooth are slips? |
Michael Gilligan | 01/11/2014 18:56:38 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Jason, According to Wikipedia: The minimum conditions for wringability are a surface finish of 1 microinch (0.025 µm) AA or better, and a flatness of at least 5 µin (0.13 µm). MichaelG. Edited By Michael Gilligan on 01/11/2014 18:57:52 |
Rik Shaw | 01/11/2014 19:12:01 |
![]() 1494 forum posts 403 photos | Michael - I think that my photos show that your "cheese" exists, I am having difficulty in understanding the point you are trying to make. Rik |
jason udall | 01/11/2014 19:22:32 |
2032 forum posts 41 photos | So oil films are potentially of the same thickness as the upper limit on the surface finish of the slips.. And Rik. I understand your test setup indicated the difference in indicated height between "dry" and oil filmed slips. .. And if I read the photo right about half a 0.0005" division.. or about 250 micro inch. ..saw no cheese ... |
Michael Gilligan | 01/11/2014 19:30:48 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Rik, My point is that there appears to be widespread confusion in this thread. Andrew made the entirely valid point that there is an "oil film" on each surface of a "wiped-clean" slip, and that the nominal thickness of the slip is reckoned to include one of these. I don't think that either of us has suggested applying a thick layer oil ... it simply needs to be recognised that the film exists. MichaelG. |
jason udall | 01/11/2014 19:37:45 |
2032 forum posts 41 photos | So a degreased slip would read low..ok by asmall amount but low... Fascinating |
Phil H 1 | 01/11/2014 20:03:27 |
128 forum posts 46 photos | Forgive me for laughing and I know that I contributed to this thread but Jack only asked what they are for. Bet he regrets asking. PhilH |
Michael Gilligan | 01/11/2014 20:11:01 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Just in case any Brit. is concerned by the use of NIST as the Authority ... here is a page from our own National Physical Laboratory. MichaelG. . P.S. ... good point, PhilH. |
Rik Shaw | 01/11/2014 20:24:47 |
![]() 1494 forum posts 403 photos | And to the OP Jack Foreman 1: "Can someone please explain what Gauge Blocks are? What do you think of it so far? Rik |
John Stevenson | 01/11/2014 22:50:15 |
![]() 5068 forum posts 3 photos | Well someone who bought a set recently got a manual with them and sent me a copy.
It runs to 174 pages
Nearly as long as this post and twice as long as waiting for Crown solo paint to dry. |
Mike Poole | 01/11/2014 23:25:19 |
![]() 3676 forum posts 82 photos | Are ceramic slips a different size from steel ones as no oil film need be present? Just giving the pot a stir! Mike |
Nick Hulme | 28/12/2014 17:15:39 |
750 forum posts 37 photos | Posted by Andrew Johnston on 31/10/2014 10:05:57:
So why does Starrett recommend wiping the mating surfaces with a cloth impregnated with a light machine oil, wiping the excess oil off with a second cloth, and the wringing the blocks together? Andrew It ensures the surfaces are free of dirt, you could use water but it would promote corrosion, you could use a degreaser but that would remove any surface corrosion protection. The assumption that the presence of oil will affect dimensions is bunk, if the metal has close enough contact to "wring" it will do so, if something is preventing intimate contact it will not "wring" I spent an entire Summer Holiday calibrating micrometers to ISO 9002 for IMI Leeds |
Michael Gilligan | 29/12/2014 22:31:31 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Nick Hulme on 28/12/2014 17:15:39:
The assumption that the presence of oil will affect dimensions is bunk, if the metal has close enough contact to "wring" it will do so, if something is preventing intimate contact it will not "wring" I spent an entire Summer Holiday calibrating micrometers to ISO 9002 for IMI Leeds . Nick, Did you look at the NPL page that I linked earlier ? [quote] It is found that phenomenon of wringing occurs due to molecular adhesion between a liquid film (whose thickness may be between 6 to 7 x 10-6 mm) and the mating surfaces. [\quote] Whether 6 to 7 millionths of a mm is relevant depends upon what you are doing; but both NIST and NPL do make allowance for the film thickness. MichaelG.
|
Larry Coleman 1 | 08/01/2015 10:59:41 |
![]() 102 forum posts 59 photos | Hey lads As a metrologist I can assure you that removing the oil is correct. The slip gauges ring together due to there surface finish which stops air from entering between them. There are three types of gauge block or slip gauges. Workshop,Reference & standards. Slip gauges have very little use outside a metrology lab because of temperature when you handle them. Although they are used with sine bars it depends how accurate your tolerance is. If it is in tenths and you handle them you will blow your tolerance. The gauge blocks are set for 23 Degrees C and your fingers are approx 37 C. The main use for the slip gauges is for calibration of measuring tools but are occasionally used in the workshop with the ambient temperature in mind.. Regards Larry Edited By Larry Coleman 1 on 08/01/2015 11:04:35 |
Andrew Johnston | 08/01/2015 12:20:50 |
![]() 7061 forum posts 719 photos | Posted by Larry Coleman 1 on 08/01/2015 10:59:41:
Hey lads As a metrologist I can assure you that removing the oil is correct. The slip gauges ring together due to there surface finish which stops air from entering between them. I don't follow that? If I understand correctly, for slip gauges to be wrung the surface finish needs to be better than about 0.025µm, or 25nm. Let's assume that we achieve a 10nm finish and it is Rz rather than Ra. I think that a nitrogen molecule is on the order of 100pm, or 0.1nm. So two orders of magnitude smaller, so I don't see how air (mostly nitrogen) can be totally excluded? What happens if you try and wring slip gauges together in a vacuum? Andrew |
martin perman | 08/01/2015 13:11:29 |
![]() 2095 forum posts 75 photos | Gentlemen, When I did my apprenticeship over forty years ago we had a very good toolmaker turned apprentice instructor who could be very pedantic in what he did or said but you couldn't fault him, one of the best. He taught grinding etc mostly and when we had to use Slip Gauges/Gauge blocks he drove a routine into us, when opening the box you cleaned each slip to remove the oil before they were rung, after using them you wiped them over with a lightly oiled cloth to remove finger prints and dirt before they went back in there place in the box, when in use they had to be kept on a piece of Baize away from your work unless being used.
Martin P |
Larry Coleman 1 | 08/01/2015 13:26:15 |
![]() 102 forum posts 59 photos | Well what you say is correct in some ways but I assure you that the surface finish on a good set of slip gauges do not need oil on them. In the metrology lab when I worked for Hawker De havilland we had the most sophisticated metrology lab in Australia and the slip gauges were checked by optical flats which are polished quarts slabs and were viewed under sodium light. Both the slip gauges and the optical flats were extensively wiped clean of any oil with a special cloth. Yes Andrew the finish is that good. Slip gauges should not be left rung together for long periods. There is a process called metal flow and they can be difficult to separate without damage. This is why air craft parts have a shelf life. I have never seen it in the lab but I have seen it in aircraft parts many times. In regards to the vacuum I have never tried it even though we had a good vacuum chamber for environmental tests. That would be interesting & when I get my orthoclave working I will see if a suction cap will work in a vacuum. Larry |
Neil Wyatt | 08/01/2015 15:56:58 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | If folks follow up some of the references given earlier they will see that it is impossible to wipe a surface completely free of oil with any kind of cloth. There will always be a molecular film left that will make a tiny (sub-optical) difference to the thickness and probably contributes to the adhesion process. I doubt that any of us in our hobby-lives will ever find a situation where a wipeover with a clean rag before use wouldn't be good enough. Neil |
martin perman | 08/01/2015 16:14:26 |
![]() 2095 forum posts 75 photos | If you look at a ground and lapped surface under a strong microscope it appears to be like a mountain range, if it had oil on its surface then any molecular film would fill the gaps allowing the larger raised area to be "oil free" after a clean. Martin P
|
jason udall | 08/01/2015 17:30:52 |
2032 forum posts 41 photos |
Edited By jason udall on 08/01/2015 17:49:35 |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.