By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
Forum sponsored by:
Forum sponsored by Forum House Ad Zone

Gatwick Drone 'Attack'

All Topics | Latest Posts

Search for:  in Thread Title in  
Sam Longley 109/01/2019 16:13:59
965 forum posts
34 photos
Posted by mechman48 on 09/01/2019 10:58:23:

Simple answer would be … whoever buys a drone has to register it with the CAA with it's serial #, model #, name & address of the owner. These drones are usually operable within a 1or 2 kilometres of the control system ( apart from industrial / film / TV production models ) so should one be 'captured' then the authorities only have to look within that radius to locate the owner …?. Just my two pence worth.

George.

Most of the members in my club make their own from scratch, as do people I know who are not members of clubs.The parts are readily obtainable from such a wide source (& for a range of uses other than drones) that they are virtually untraceable

As an aside, I watched the programme a few months ago about the Battle of Britain where they had models flying in combat. I seem to recall that some had lasers & successfully "shot down" the opposition. If these lasers are successful at disabling the electronics; then I am sure that I could soon be skillful enough to down a drone, from another drone, with a laser, once I saw one & could chase after it. That must be a cheap way of doing it, provided one could get near enough in time- That being the problem.

Chris Trice09/01/2019 16:39:29
avatar
1376 forum posts
10 photos

In the Battle Of Britain program, the planes shot down were programmed to do so when they registered a hit on themselves. They weren't literally shot down with a laser. The same technology is used in places like Laserquest where people wear jackets that register enemy hits on themselves.

Vic09/01/2019 17:01:04
3453 forum posts
23 photos
Posted by Pete White on 09/01/2019 09:28:46:

I don't we are getting all the information here.................as usual .

Yes. I think it's been agreed now that the only drones at Gatwick were ones used by the Police?!

Robert Atkinson 209/01/2019 18:24:32
avatar
1891 forum posts
37 photos
Posted by Vic on 09/01/2019 17:01:04:
Posted by Pete White on 09/01/2019 09:28:46:

I don't we are getting all the information here.................as usual .

Yes. I think it's been agreed now that the only drones at Gatwick were ones used by the Police?!

NO it's not. The police have specifically stated this was not the case and ther were several credible witnesses. Police only flew their drones after the airport was closed. The Air Navigation Order applies to them too.

Vic09/01/2019 19:18:51
3453 forum posts
23 photos
Posted by Robert Atkinson 2 on 09/01/2019 18:24:32:
Posted by Vic on 09/01/2019 17:01:04:
Posted by Pete White on 09/01/2019 09:28:46:

I don't we are getting all the information here.................as usual .

Yes. I think it's been agreed now that the only drones at Gatwick were ones used by the Police?!

NO it's not. The police have specifically stated this was not the case and ther were several credible witnesses. Police only flew their drones after the airport was closed. The Air Navigation Order applies to them too.

**LINK**

Michael Gilligan09/01/2019 19:24:15
avatar
23121 forum posts
1360 photos
Posted by Vic on 09/01/2019 19:18:51:

**LINK**

.

dont know ... The opening words of that report are 'Some of ..."

Neil Wyatt09/01/2019 19:46:50
avatar
19226 forum posts
749 photos
86 articles
Posted by Michael Gilligan on 09/01/2019 19:24:15:
Posted by Vic on 09/01/2019 19:18:51:

**LINK**

.

dont know ... The opening words of that report are 'Some of ..."

Don't spoil a good story with facts

Vic09/01/2019 19:56:50
3453 forum posts
23 photos

The headline says:

"Gatwick Airport drone sightings may have been of police equipment, chief constable admits". cheeky

Michael Gilligan09/01/2019 20:00:24
avatar
23121 forum posts
1360 photos
Posted by Vic on 09/01/2019 19:56:50:

The headline says:

"Gatwick Airport drone sightings may have been of police equipment, chief constable admits". cheeky

.

Which you interpreted as ...

Yes. I think it's been agreed now that the only drones at Gatwick were ones used by the Police?!

Samsaranda09/01/2019 20:04:36
avatar
1688 forum posts
16 photos

Isn’t it amazing how so much faith will probably be put in a system of licensing for drones in order to control a rebel element using them for nefarious purposes. As a licensed and responsible gun owner I reflect on how successful that stricter controls were in stopping criminals from using guns for criminal purposes, those caught for using guns in crime certainly don’t subject themselves to a strict state controlled registration system, can’t imagine that those who want to misuse drones are going to voluntarily submit their details to a licensing regime. Those with innocent intentions will be registered while the criminals will just cock a snook.

Dave W

Jeff Dayman09/01/2019 20:50:22
2356 forum posts
47 photos

"while the criminals will just cock a snook."

What does this phrase mean please? not familiar with this bit of English.

Vic09/01/2019 20:51:22
3453 forum posts
23 photos
Posted by Michael Gilligan on 09/01/2019 20:00:24:
Posted by Vic on 09/01/2019 19:56:50:

The headline says:

"Gatwick Airport drone sightings may have been of police equipment, chief constable admits". cheeky

.

Which you interpreted as ...

Yes. I think it's been agreed now that the only drones at Gatwick were ones used by the Police?!

Well this has been done to death on other forums and many think the same. What do you think "Gatwick Airport drone sightings may have been of police equipment, chief constable admits", means or do you just not believe the Chief constable?

Norfolk Boy09/01/2019 21:13:36
74 forum posts
18 photos

"what does this phrase mean please? not familiar with this bit of English."

I think most readily interpreted as the "visual vernacular" (if such a thing exists) of "give the finger" or the V sign, as in "up yours" I hope that has not offended.  Maybe even  modern, "Yeah Whatever" then do as you like.

Alan

 

Edited By Norfolk Boy on 09/01/2019 21:15:43

Michael Gilligan09/01/2019 21:42:31
avatar
23121 forum posts
1360 photos
Posted by Vic on 09/01/2019 20:51:22:
Posted by Michael Gilligan on 09/01/2019 20:00:24:
Posted by Vic on 09/01/2019 19:56:50:

The headline says:

"Gatwick Airport drone sightings may have been of police equipment, chief constable admits". cheeky

.

Which you interpreted as ...

Yes. I think it's been agreed now that the only drones at Gatwick were ones used by the Police?!

Well this has been done to death on other forums and many think the same. What do you think "Gatwick Airport drone sightings may have been of police equipment, chief constable admits", means or do you just not believe the Chief constable?

.

I'm not picking an argument, Vic ... I just find your interpretation rather 'ambitious'

In the quote above, I have emboldened what I find a disturbing leap

Let's just agree to differ

MichaelG.

Michael Gilligan09/01/2019 21:57:20
avatar
23121 forum posts
1360 photos
Posted by Norfolk Boy on 09/01/2019 21:13:36:

I think most readily interpreted as the "visual vernacular" (if such a thing exists) ...

.

Broadly true, Alan ... but more specifically; this gesture: **LINK**

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cocking_a_snook

MichaelG.

Fergus Stirling09/01/2019 23:48:04
avatar
15 forum posts

Ironically, the police drones had to be modified before they could fly them over Gatwick as the airspace was GPS denied by the manufacturer.

Danny M2Z10/01/2019 03:00:12
avatar
963 forum posts
2 photos

It looks like the fallout from this 'incident' is reverberating around the world. **LINK** and here **LINK**

Like our knee jerk firearms laws, this is harassing and penalising the innocent, law abiding majority for the transgressions of a few nutbags.

It would have been more effective to spend the $$$ by educating the public rather than stamping down on them.

A criminal operator is as likely to register a drone as they do with an illegal firearm or stolen car.

Why just not demonise the law breaker's and lock them up for a looong time with lots of publicity?

Also, the mass/mess media have a lot to answer for, but that seems to be normal nowadays (when it suits them), as they also fly drones to gather their harvest.

* Danny M *

All Topics | Latest Posts

Please login to post a reply.

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!

Find Model Engineer & Model Engineers' Workshop

Sign up to our Newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.

You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
cowells
Sarik
MERIDIENNE EXHIBITIONS LTD
Subscription Offer

Latest "For Sale" Ads
Latest "Wanted" Ads
Get In Touch!

Do you want to contact the Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop team?

You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.

Click THIS LINK for full contact details.

For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.

Digital Back Issues

Social Media online

'Like' us on Facebook
Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter
 Twitter Logo

Pin us on Pinterest

 

Donate

donate