Milly S | 04/04/2023 19:39:41 |
42 forum posts 9 photos | Hi All can anyone help please I’m looking for a plug in speed controller to operate my bench drill, I’m sick of changing belts to achieve different speeds has anyone got one they can recommend thanks Steve |
Grizzly bear | 04/04/2023 19:46:13 |
337 forum posts 8 photos | Hi, Make and model of your drill please. Bear....... |
Ady1 | 04/04/2023 20:15:11 |
![]() 6137 forum posts 893 photos | I got one of those brushless vevor sewing machine jobs for under a ton, 750w Only time will tell on reliability but it ran my drummond M ok as a test |
Milly S | 04/04/2023 20:52:38 |
42 forum posts 9 photos | Hi bear it’s a Rexon Lexus DP255A cheers steve |
duncan webster | 04/04/2023 20:56:34 |
5307 forum posts 83 photos | From the info on the web it looks like a single phase induction motor, so you'll have to swap the motor. I wouldn't have thought it was worth the effort, and you will lose power at low speed. |
noel shelley | 04/04/2023 21:24:44 |
2308 forum posts 33 photos | Unless your in to PRECISE cutting speeds and feed, just get used to it ! Other wise VFD and 3Ph motor in delta. REALY NOT WORTH THE EFFORT. Noel. |
Roderick Jenkins | 04/04/2023 22:40:56 |
![]() 2376 forum posts 800 photos | Steve's Rexon looks to be similar to my 16mm Jet, which is a pain to change belt speeds. I changed my motor to 3 phase with VFD and don't regret it, much more convenient. The ability to slow start, or even go in reverse when centering on existing holes is very useful. Rod |
John Haine | 05/04/2023 07:21:14 |
5563 forum posts 322 photos | And tapping! |
DMB | 05/04/2023 08:41:16 |
1585 forum posts 1 photos | The following is how I overcome the belt changing annoyance. I think the vfd route is a rather expensive luxury and it would be more cost effective to fit on my Dore Westbury, as it has much more 'daylight' under the chuck than the 'Sharp' mill. I have a Fobco Star bench drill with several drive pulleys on which they are easy to change the belt. I normally leave the belt on a pulley which gives a low speed for the job in hand. If I need to drill a small hole, I up the speed to max and a very large hole, it's reduced to the lowest. So by my method, 'average' size holes are likely to be drilled at somewhere near optimum, but exceptionally small or large holes are made with a belt change, thus limiting belt changes. Seems to work satisfactorily. Having described that, I don't use the drill so much these days, because I prefer to use a drill chuck on my 'Sharp' mill with the added benefit of X and Y precise positioning. Lack of 'daylight' space on the mill forces me to start a large finish hole with smaller starting series of drills then transfer the job to the Fobco which accommodates the larger diameter drills with their corresponding increase in length. Realignment of the hole under the Fobco's chuck being achieved by a temporary use of the last drill as a guide pin. This method works well for me. I hope to have a DRO system permanently fixed to the DW and do all my drilling on it. Would still be reluctant to sell my very beefy Fobco. John Edited By DMB on 05/04/2023 08:48:21 |
Jelly | 05/04/2023 12:20:41 |
![]() 474 forum posts 103 photos | Posted by duncan webster on 04/04/2023 20:56:34:
From the info on the web it looks like a single phase induction motor, so you'll have to swap the motor. I wouldn't have thought it was worth the effort, and you will lose power at low speed. That's down to implementation. The recommendation for using VFD's for speed control I've had from ABB and others (when discussing pumping and material conveying applications) is thus:
They were very clear that you should not be running motors below their rated frequency.
Applying that to the use case here, a 40-400hz 4 pole motor with a fixed two stage 5:1 and 2:1 pulley reduction could give a speed range from say 24-2400rpm, which would be suitable for pretty much anything you might realistically drive in a MT2 drill spindle. If you only do smaller work you might consider a different setup like buying a 50-250 Hz 2 pole with a 5:1 reduction to give 300-3000rpm.
*In our use case this would mean looking at the recommended metal removal rates for drills of various sizes in various materials, developing curves for power consumption and using those identify the point at which the highest power demand is and it's corresponding RPM, so you can match that to the motor's curve. Edited By Jelly on 05/04/2023 12:34:33 Edited By Jelly on 05/04/2023 12:50:44 |
duncan webster | 05/04/2023 18:17:14 |
5307 forum posts 83 photos | 400 hz on a 4 pole motor is 12000 rpm (nominal). I can't imagine such a motor is cheap. If you run 2:1 off that you get 6000 rpm rpm spindle speed, not 2400 and I doubt an ordinary vee belt is going to like going at that sort of speed. If you intended 5:1 to get 2400 rpm, then I'm not clear why you need the 2:1 If you're going to have 2 belt speed ranges, you might as well stick with 5, just make it easier to change. My Drilling machine has 500 - 4000 rpm, I don't reckon you need to go any slower for a 1/2" drill Edited By duncan webster on 05/04/2023 18:17:44 |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.