By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
Forum sponsored by:
Forum sponsored by Forum House Ad Zone

Myford ml7 toolpost bolts

All Topics | Latest Posts

Search for:  in Thread Title in  
Chris Murphy11/07/2022 16:44:02
76 forum posts
63 photos

7170f996-7e94-41a7-8f57-e40906f99346.jpegHi,

does anyone know what size these bolts are.

as you can see I need another 4, hopefully Myford do some spares.

thanks

chris m….fa754d63-a6ec-4359-b597-5c2122f62e65.jpeg

Clive Brown 111/07/2022 16:51:22
1050 forum posts
56 photos

I no longer have a Myford 4-way toolpost, but, as I remember, the screws were 1/4" Whitworth, ( or possibly 5/16" Whit.you need to measure).

In any event, they will be available as standard Whitworth allen screws, I'd look on Ebay.

 

Edited By Clive Brown 1 on 11/07/2022 16:55:02

Nick Wheeler11/07/2022 19:10:44
1227 forum posts
101 photos

Why not measure them so you can source them locally and cheaply?

All it takes is a caliper - which you'll need to use the machine - and a thread gauge.

Mike Poole11/07/2022 19:35:16
avatar
3676 forum posts
82 photos

I would make sure you buy top quality screws, the sockets take a lot of use on a toolpost and some cheap no name screws are not as tough as they should be and the fit of the socket can be less than good.

Mike

Howard Lewis11/07/2022 19:46:00
7227 forum posts
21 photos

They look like 1/4 BSW., and I no longrer have a ML7 to check, just your picture showing a coarse thread.

If you start collecting capscrews of various sizes and threads, You will soon be able to find out such things in a matter of minutes, AND they will useful for tasks such as this, so that you can find a solution yourself...

Expect to find threads on a ML7 to be BSW, BSF or possibly BA for gib strips.

A machine of that age (Launched in 18947, so designed before then ) so will be Imperial sizing, unless it is a machine manufactured on the Continent.

Howard

DiogenesII11/07/2022 20:07:13
859 forum posts
268 photos

Yes they are 1/4BSW - GWR Fasteners do 'em.

Howard, do you know if the originals had dog-points?

Howard Lewis11/07/2022 20:18:49
7227 forum posts
21 photos

Would expect the originals to be flat ended to minimise digging into the tools.

In use, they probably mushroom, so might be worth turning away the first couple of threads, to core diameter, since they will be in fresh air, and doing nothing anyway. That should make them easier to remove when they do mushroom and need fettling.

For Chris's benefit, just go to your local hardware stockist (Here in Peterborough its Sterling Nut and Bolt ) and buy some.

If they have a minimum order policy, buy some others, what ever you think might "Come in handy one day" to make up the cost.

Howard

Edited By Howard Lewis on 11/07/2022 20:19:02

Michael Gilligan11/07/2022 23:06:01
avatar
23121 forum posts
1360 photos
Posted by DiogenesII on 11/07/2022 20:07:13:

Yes they are 1/4BSW - GWR Fasteners do 'em.

do you know if the originals had dog-points?

.

Can’t be sure, but I would have expected the originals to have square heads and very slightly domed tips.

GKN made such things as a general stock item.

Back in the day, socket screws would be seen as too likely to fill with brass chips.

MichaelG.

Hopper12/07/2022 00:48:10
avatar
7881 forum posts
397 photos

Surprisingly, the originals were 1/4" BSW socket head cap screws (aka Allen heads). They seem to be high enough up that swarf does not fill them up.

I machine the ends flat then put on a very slight dome with a file then machine the OD down to about thread root diameter for the first 1/16" or less, so that if you ever want to take it out, the thread is not burred over on the end.

Note when buying new screws, the length to specify is the length of the shank only, not including the head.

Michael Gilligan12/07/2022 05:34:35
avatar
23121 forum posts
1360 photos
Posted by Hopper on 12/07/2022 00:48:10:

Surprisingly, the originals were 1/4" BSW socket head cap screws (aka Allen heads). …

.

That did surprise, and rather disappoint, me … but I was happy to take your word for it

… until I found the beautiful photo supplied by Bruce Stephenson on this thread: **LINK** 

19/01/2021 12:56:08

https://www.model-engineer.co.uk/forums/postings.asp?th=170513

MichaelG.

 

Edited By Michael Gilligan on 12/07/2022 05:38:20

Hopper12/07/2022 06:18:15
avatar
7881 forum posts
397 photos
Posted by Michael Gilligan on 12/07/2022 05:34:35:
Posted by Hopper on 12/07/2022 00:48:10:

Surprisingly, the originals were 1/4" BSW socket head cap screws (aka Allen heads). …

.

That did surprise, and rather disappoint, me … but I was happy to take your word for it

… until I found the beautiful photo supplied by Bruce Stephenson on this thread: **LINK**

19/01/2021 12:56:08

https://www.model-engineer.co.uk/forums/postings.asp?th=170513

MichaelG.

 

Edited By Michael Gilligan on 12/07/2022 05:38:20

Photo taken 65 years after it left the factory. All the old photos show cap screws.

Edited By Hopper on 12/07/2022 06:23:48

not done it yet12/07/2022 07:41:08
7517 forum posts
20 photos

Cap screws are the modern cheap way of doing it - adopted by the cheap-skates who manufactured machines down to a price. OK for those that blow compressed air around the place, spreading swarf and grit all over the place, I suppose.

Cap screws in that orientation collect debris very effectively. One reason why male bolt heads and female socket spanners were used in the past (apart from the fact tha cap screws were not common, or even available). Square headed bolts were also easily made by users.

You may not have noted that you never see anyone, on you tube, having to clear out the torx screw heads, when changing inserts on cutter holders?

The screws on my original chinese lathe 4 way tool post were not even machined to avoid thread-spreading issues! Talk about being cheap!

Hopper12/07/2022 08:51:32
avatar
7881 forum posts
397 photos
Posted by not done it yet on 12/07/2022 07:41:08:

Cap screws are the modern cheap way of doing it - adopted by the cheap-skates who manufactured machines down to a price.

The post-war Myford approach to production engineering exactly. That is how the ML7 sold for less than its predecessor the M-Type. (Which used square-headed toolpost screws BTW!)

Howard Lewis12/07/2022 10:00:24
7227 forum posts
21 photos

When I made the clamp screws for my 4 way rear toolpost, 1/2" bar was ideal for making the M10 clamp screws, The square head left a nice shoulder to replicate the clamp screws in the front toolpost..

This allows the same wrench to be used on both posts., to clamp tools.

I would be tempted to make my own eight square headed clamp screws.

Making the screws from 10 mm bar should mean that a square headed 1/4 BSW clamp screw would have a shoulder 0.040" ( 0.020" a side ) larger than the thread.

Lets hope that the OP has the ability to do this!

Howard

ega12/07/2022 10:17:52
2805 forum posts
219 photos

GHT considered cap screws to be acceptable for this purpose. Chips in the hex recess have never troubled me but I do use a ball-ended driver. Another reason to use cap screws would be losing the square key!

Someone mentioned that cap screws were prohibited in coal mines except where they were installed upside down.

Hopper12/07/2022 10:33:20
avatar
7881 forum posts
397 photos

If you have ever worked around coal you would know why! Horrible stuff. The dust/grit gets in everywhere and yes would fill up a cap screw.

Seems like all the old Myford factory literature has the "Dutch shoe" type toolpost featured. But Sparey's book A Man and His Lathe shows what looks like a Myford supplied retouched photo of a four-way, which the caption says is a genuine Myford accessory, and it has cap screws.

ega12/07/2022 11:47:59
2805 forum posts
219 photos

My impression is that QCTP tool holders generally use hex recess clamp screws and they have an army of fans.

Nick Wheeler12/07/2022 12:26:46
1227 forum posts
101 photos

If replacing the screws, I'd go for flush fitting grub screws so they don't stick up. That's something I've been meaning to do to all of my QC holders for some time. Picking grot out of the internal hexes when I loosen them every few years doesn't matter, whereas they do collect swarf every time they're used.

Mike Poole12/07/2022 14:04:35
avatar
3676 forum posts
82 photos

With a QCTP the holder can be inverted and tapped on the bench to clear chips from the sockets but a four way is not so easy. A sacrificial bit of plasticine or blu tac will clear the chips but bin it after use. Compressed air is effective but apart from the chips going where you don’t want them on the machine they are near certain to go in your eye even if wearing safety specs, even closing your eyes may not work as when you open them the chips stuck to your eyelid fall in your eye. My first choice would be to hunt down some square headed screws but that may not be so easy, remember that 1/4 UNC is often a passable alternative to 1/4 BSW and in this application will not be critical

Mike

Sandgrounder12/07/2022 15:10:34
256 forum posts
6 photos
Posted by Mike Poole on 12/07/2022 14:04:35:

My first choice would be to hunt down some square headed screws but that may not be so easy, remember that 1/4 UNC is often a passable alternative to 1/4 BSW and in this application will not be critical

Mike

Why are square headed screws used anyway and not hexagon headed? I've always thought the latter are easier to obtain and use with more spanner positions available, especially if using a bi-hex wrench. is it just historical?

John

All Topics | Latest Posts

Please login to post a reply.

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!

Find Model Engineer & Model Engineers' Workshop

Sign up to our Newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.

You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
cowells
Sarik
MERIDIENNE EXHIBITIONS LTD
Subscription Offer

Latest "For Sale" Ads
Latest "Wanted" Ads
Get In Touch!

Do you want to contact the Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop team?

You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.

Click THIS LINK for full contact details.

For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.

Digital Back Issues

Social Media online

'Like' us on Facebook
Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter
 Twitter Logo

Pin us on Pinterest

 

Donate

donate