Joe McKean | 25/06/2021 20:26:04 |
60 forum posts 3 photos | I'm just about to make a grate for a 3.5 gauge locomotive out of stainless steel and was wondering if there was a recommended preference which grade of stainless to use. I understand the machinability of the different grades and that some are more resistant to the corrosive gases than others so what would be the best all rounder. Joe |
noel shelley | 25/06/2021 21:45:09 |
2308 forum posts 33 photos | I would use 316 ! BUT when drilling or working it any tool MUST cut ! if it rubs it will almost instantly harden and your in trouble as it will be so hard ordinary drills won't touch it. But it welds nicely. Good luck, Noel |
Thor 🇳🇴 | 26/06/2021 08:43:47 |
![]() 1766 forum posts 46 photos | Hi Joe, More ino on heat resistance of stainless steel here. Thor |
Circlip | 26/06/2021 08:53:47 |
1723 forum posts | Basic types a firm where I worked was 304 for general purpose, 316 for Hygenic applications or 321 for heat applications. Yes there are Inconels and Nimonics for ultimate heat but we are talking toy trains, not F1. Regards Ian. Edited By Circlip on 26/06/2021 08:54:43 |
Bill Pudney | 27/06/2021 00:22:16 |
622 forum posts 24 photos | At work, many years ago after some problems machining 316 plate and ruining a couple of cutters, I made some inquiries of the metal supplier. It seems that, at least up here in Australia 316 plate is intended for weldments and fabrications where little or no machining is anticipated, 316 bar has a dollop of sulphur included which makes it very machineable, but not very weldable. I don't know if this practice is followed wherever Joe McKean is, but it might stand some further investigation!! Best of luck cheers Bill |
jimmy b | 27/06/2021 09:22:02 |
![]() 857 forum posts 45 photos | 303 stainless has Sulphur in (0.15-0.35%), 316 has 0.03% max Sulphur content.
Jim |
Circlip | 27/06/2021 09:26:21 |
1723 forum posts | And easier machineability was noted by 304L and 316L for lower Carbon content. Regards Ian. |
Peter Sansom | 28/06/2021 12:24:30 |
125 forum posts 4 photos | 303 Stainless is free machining version of 304. 304 is great for cryogenics, BOC used to make its cryogenic plants with 304 SS. 316 is better for Salt water corrosion, 321 for heat. Peter |
Clive Brown 1 | 28/06/2021 13:11:00 |
1050 forum posts 56 photos | For the OP's firegrate, any 300 series austenitic steel will vastly out-perform mild steel or cast iron, and probably last the proverbial lifetime. Since it's readily available, I'd probably use 304(L) sheet for the firebars. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.