RAMA HEGDE | 01/05/2020 21:00:25 |
![]() 4 forum posts 3 photos |
|
Robin | 01/05/2020 21:47:00 |
![]() 678 forum posts | I think we are all wondering what you are pushing against? The answer depends on the angle of that driving face. Approx 1 ton |
RAMA HEGDE | 02/05/2020 01:45:31 |
![]() 4 forum posts 3 photos | The job is circular bar and it has been pushing against V- block. |
not done it yet | 02/05/2020 07:06:18 |
7517 forum posts 20 photos | If nothing is moving the opposing forces, by Newton’s First Law of Motion, are equal. Direction is another matter. One Pascal is one Newton / square metre. |
Redsetter | 02/05/2020 07:51:01 |
239 forum posts 1 photos | I think we are all wondering what are you actually trying to do, and is that really the best way of doing it?
|
DC31k | 02/05/2020 07:56:09 |
1186 forum posts 11 photos | Since you show a pin joint at the base of the middle arm, there will be no clamping force as you have drawn a mechanism. The horizontal arm will try to move to the left due to the wedging action at the right of it and will result in the piston tilting in the cylinder and all pressure being lost. To make this statically determinate, you need an encastre joint at the base of the middle leg and to specify the angle at the right hand end of the horizontal arm. |
Dave Halford | 02/05/2020 09:08:39 |
2536 forum posts 24 photos | The Vee block will move. |
Michael Gilligan | 02/05/2020 09:33:32 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Dave Halford on 02/05/2020 09:08:39:
The Vee block will move. . The Vee block is shown as ‘mechanically earthed’ ... Did the Earth move for you today, Dave ? MichaelG.
|
SillyOldDuffer | 02/05/2020 09:55:11 |
10668 forum posts 2415 photos | Here's my attempt at the calculation, done with smath studio (free software) for which I am eternally grateful to Mr Duncan Webster of this Forum. Lots of good things about smath, in this case I use it to finesse the units automatically into consistent Metres/Kilograms/Seconds, and exploit built in values for pi and the gravitational constant (approx 9.81). Ought to warn I am famously bad at maths! Much prone to silly mistakes, getting the wrong end of the stick and missing bits out. Double check everything, I'm liable to do things like get the lever the wrong way round. (Here I hope the lever reduces force on the job by 4/6...) My answer: about two thirds of a metric ton. Hope it's right! Dave Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 02/05/2020 09:55:38 |
Steviegtr | 02/05/2020 10:00:50 |
![]() 2668 forum posts 352 photos | If your math is correct then I hope his centre fulcrum is pretty rigid. Steve. |
Dave Halford | 02/05/2020 10:12:28 |
2536 forum posts 24 photos | Posted by Michael Gilligan on 02/05/2020 09:33:32:
Posted by Dave Halford on 02/05/2020 09:08:39:
The Vee block will move. . The Vee block is shown as ‘mechanically earthed’ ... Did the Earth move for you today, Dave ? MichaelG.
I can't remember |
duncan webster | 02/05/2020 11:09:18 |
5307 forum posts 83 photos | SOD's sum gives the force acting vertically down, to get the force pushing the round bit into the vee block you have to allow for the angle of the end face. Then it gets involved in friction, which is never a known quantity, and I haven't had my weetabix yet. As Robin says, need to know the angle of the push face, and the exact relationship between the pivots and the bar, if they are not in line it changes the answer |
Rod Renshaw | 02/05/2020 11:54:29 |
438 forum posts 2 photos | +1 for DC31k's analysis. The system as drawn will not act as a clamp at all. The "Centre Fulcrum" at the base of the vertical lever is shown as a pivot and is not rigid at all, so as the pressure in the cylinder rises the horizontal lever will press just a little on the work and then move to the left as there is nothing to restrain it from so doing. Did I just repeat what DC31k said in less accurate language? All that wasted maths! Rod |
not done it yet | 02/05/2020 12:23:41 |
7517 forum posts 20 photos | Dave(SOD), Unfortunately it will be accelerating (well, something will) - according to Newton’s Second Law. if accelerating, by definition its velocity cannot be zero (for very long, anyway)! |
duncan webster | 02/05/2020 12:27:01 |
5307 forum posts 83 photos | The base of the pivot point is clearly shown as grounded (slanty lines underneath), it won't move anywhere as long as it doesn't snap. We must assume the base of the cylinder is similarly prevented from moving down, but I think that is a safe assumption.
|
Steviegtr | 02/05/2020 12:43:16 |
![]() 2668 forum posts 352 photos | Posted by not done it yet on 02/05/2020 12:23:41:
Dave(SOD), Unfortunately it will be accelerating (well, something will) - according to Newton’s Second Law. if accelerating, by definition its velocity cannot be zero (for very long, anyway)! Across the workshop floor probably. Not a good method of clamping. Must be a better way than that. Steve. |
pgk pgk | 02/05/2020 13:06:11 |
2661 forum posts 294 photos | I'd go with SOD but if one wishes to be difficult then it's point contact so the force expressed as pressure per area is infinite. Indeed the piston needn't be round and the whole thing could be end on for a long system.... pgk |
RAMA HEGDE | 02/05/2020 13:08:20 |
![]() 4 forum posts 3 photos | Hi, Here I am giving little more details. |
duncan webster | 02/05/2020 13:15:30 |
5307 forum posts 83 photos | Ah just had another look at the sketch, I'm in error. Because there is a little link between the lever and the fixed pivot all the side load will be applied to the top of the piston rod, which has no sensible means of resisting it, so it won't work. Strange how you sometimes look at something and see what ought to be there, not what is there. |
SillyOldDuffer | 02/05/2020 13:19:05 |
10668 forum posts 2415 photos | Posted by duncan webster on 02/05/2020 12:27:01:
The base of the pivot point is clearly shown as grounded (slanty lines underneath), it won't move anywhere as long as it doesn't snap. We must assume the base of the cylinder is similarly prevented from moving down, but I think that is a safe assumption.
I agree about safe assumptions! For completeness I assumed:
But your other post mentions the angle of the lever on the rod as being relevant. I missed that! So, if the angle at the end of the lever is 20°, what is the force F on the job, and F1 and F2 on the V-Block? Back at school my mathematical humiliations were only in front of the whole class. Now I'm messing up on the internet! Dave PS This post crossed with Rama's clarification. I guessed 20° correctly! Amazing. Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 02/05/2020 13:21:57 Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 02/05/2020 13:24:27 |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.