A repeat of issue 172 Cover picture
Gray62 | 03/08/2018 22:43:03 |
1058 forum posts 16 photos | Is it just me or is the cover picture of the latest issue an exact copy of issue 172 ? Is it also just a weird coincidence that the number sequence 271 is a reversal of 172 ? Has the editor run out of decent cover pictures? |
Michael Gilligan | 03/08/2018 23:01:16 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by NLP on 03/08/2018 22:43:03:
Has the editor run out of decent cover pictures? . ... and are we to expect a run of indecent ones |
JasonB | 04/08/2018 06:54:27 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | machining a big bit of metal like that takes a long time Text is also the same by the looks of it.
At least the mystery tool was an easy one to identify. |
Neil Wyatt | 04/08/2018 08:00:12 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | It's not practical for me to check if every article is truly unique, if I get sent one I assume its novel unless there is something familiar about it. It appears that the author was either unaware or forgot that the article had been published in 2011 and sent it to me in 2017. With this one the shot in question is an obvious choice for a cover too. Neil |
V8Eng | 04/08/2018 09:22:02 |
1826 forum posts 1 photos | Interesting to read in the same issue that Percival Marshall died in 1948 and that 2018 is the 60th anniversary of his death?? |
Michael Gilligan | 04/08/2018 09:30:55 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by V8Eng on 04/08/2018 09:22:02:
Interesting to read in the same issue that Percival Marshall died in 1948 and that 2018 is the 60th anniversary of his death?? . To adapt an old aphorism: Calculate twice ... Print once |
Neil Wyatt | 04/08/2018 10:41:54 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | I shouldn't have reprinted a Scribe a Line from 2008... |
V8Eng | 04/08/2018 11:22:51 |
1826 forum posts 1 photos | There is an upside to this: I first read that in the early hours and for a while it had me thinking I was 10 years younger.😉 Edited By V8Eng on 04/08/2018 11:23:04 |
Nick Clarke 3 | 04/08/2018 18:18:06 |
![]() 1607 forum posts 69 photos | Posted by Michael Gilligan on 04/08/2018 09:30:55:
To adapt an old aphorism: Calculate twice ... Print once I'm sorry but I think you have that wrong - Shouldn't it be 'measure twice, cut once - then force it to fit??'
|
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.