Neil Wyatt | 15/12/2017 12:04:15 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Can anyone answer this question... On a Vicker's Light tank or similar the 'turret' bears a smaller 'cupola' which the commander sits in or pokes their head out of. Form appearances, this is designed to rotate, which make sense. But do they? Neil |
DMB | 15/12/2017 12:56:02 |
1585 forum posts 1 photos | Hi Neil, If stuck, try " Bovvy" - Bovington Tank Museum in Dorset. Merry Xmas n rgds, John
|
Jon Gibbs | 15/12/2017 15:25:52 |
750 forum posts | In all of the photos I've seen the hatches appear to be positioned fore and aft which would suggest that the cupola was fixed but there appears to be a bit of a discrepancy between these photos...
So, it's hard to know for sure. Jon Edited By Jon Gibbs on 15/12/2017 15:26:27 Edit: Ahhh, Wikipedia says... "The Mk VIA had a return roller removed from the top of the leading bogey and attached to the hull sides instead, and also possessed a faceted cupola.[7] The Mk VIB was mechanically identical to the Mk VIA but with a few minor differences to make production simpler, including a one-piece armoured louvre over the radiator instead of a two-piece louvre, and a plain circular cupola instead of the faceted type.[7] " So, perhaps the VIA faceted cupola has the two viewports (picture 1) whereas the VIB has the one viewport facing forward. Edited By Jon Gibbs on 15/12/2017 15:32:59 |
Neil Wyatt | 15/12/2017 15:58:15 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Thanks John, Two of those photos are new to me (and I have collected a fair few). The second one shows the rather basic sight well; how on earth you were expected to use it looking through the slits with the visor closed I have no idea! I think the best bet for now is simply not to fix it in place! Here's progress so far, waiting for proofs of ME 263 to upload has given me time to fit the smoke grenade launchers today.
|
SillyOldDuffer | 15/12/2017 15:59:59 |
10668 forum posts 2415 photos | All the photos I've seen show the cupola pointing forward on top of the turret. That implies it's fixed. I don't think the photos prove it though. The commander would normally want to see what was in front of the gun, making the 'cupola ahead' position most likely to be photographed. It's still possible that the commander was able to rotate the cupola to get an all-round view when necessary. As I can only see one viewport in the cupola, if it's fixed, the commander would have to slowly turn the whole turret to see behind or to the sides. Not ideal in a vehicle intended for reconnaissance, therefore I guess the cupola rotates. On the other hand, you wouldn't want the cupola to come off under attack. It would be safer for the commander if it were firmly fixed. Anyone live near the Bovington Tank Museum? |
SillyOldDuffer | 15/12/2017 16:10:44 |
10668 forum posts 2415 photos | Looking again at Jon's first picture, although the hatch covers are aligned front/back, the closed viewport is looking right. It's in a different position compared with Jon's second picture where the open viewport is looking ahead. The photos appear to show the cupola moves whilst the hatch stays aligned with the turret. Surely that's unlikely? Unless the commander sits in a fixed ahead seat to which the hatch is attached, inside a rotating cupola? Dave |
JasonB | 15/12/2017 16:32:31 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | Neil, why not ask on our sister forum Mil Mod? |
Neil Wyatt | 15/12/2017 16:33:52 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | There's a second viewport on the back of the cupola. Logically it must(?) rotate, but I imagine it had a detent for straight ahead. bear in mind that outside exercises/combat the commander would spend most of the time with his head out of the hatch.I'm not sure I have seen one genuine combat picture If I've learned anything from this, it's that a small, stumpy tank looks very different at different angles! Neil
|
Neil Wyatt | 15/12/2017 16:51:06 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Posted by JasonB on 15/12/2017 16:32:31:
Neil, why not ask on our sister forum Mil Mod? It won't let me log in! Will have to wait for MEW 263 to be finished then I will sort it |
SillyOldDuffer | 15/12/2017 18:39:50 |
10668 forum posts 2415 photos | 3 screen captures from Tank Chats#6 on youtube Number one below: hatch opening to side, no viewport visible Number 2: Damaged tank, hatch and viewport skewed anticlockwise relative to turret rear Number 3: viewport facing sideways towards camera. I think the best explanation is that the cupola rotates. Dave |
JasonB | 15/12/2017 18:47:22 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | Posted by Neil Wyatt on 15/12/2017 16:51:06:
It won't let me log in! Don't forget you are Stubby on there and not Neil. |
Neil Wyatt | 15/12/2017 19:30:23 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Posted by JasonB on 15/12/2017 18:47:22:
Posted by Neil Wyatt on 15/12/2017 16:51:06:
It won't let me log in! Don't forget you are Stubby on there and not Neil. Yes, but which one of my seven email addresses.... Neil |
MW | 15/12/2017 19:37:23 |
![]() 2052 forum posts 56 photos | Don't spose you could ring up the nearest bloke who's got one lying around in the garage, go round his house and when you're sitting in the top see if you can shimmy from left to right and notice the whole ring move? I'm sure they've had these kinds of questions before.
|
Alan Vos | 15/12/2017 20:07:49 |
162 forum posts 7 photos | Posted by SillyOldDuffer on 15/12/2017 18:39:50:
3 screen captures from Tank Chats#6 on youtube Number one below: hatch opening to side, no viewport visible That is the image I find most persuasive. That sharp internal corner below the front of the cupola would seem an odd feature for a tank if fixed. |
Ed Duffner | 15/12/2017 20:15:41 |
863 forum posts 104 photos | In my plans for a Tiger 1 from Bovington Tank Museum (2003) is a list of other plans they keep, including: Light Mk VI Ed.
|
Neil Wyatt | 15/12/2017 20:44:02 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | Posted by SillyOldDuffer on 15/12/2017 18:39:50:
3 screen captures from Tank Chats#6 on youtube Number one below: hatch opening to side, no viewport visible Number 2: Damaged tank, hatch and viewport skewed anticlockwise relative to turret rear Number 3: viewport facing sideways towards camera. I think the best explanation is that the cupola rotates. Dave Wow, that's great, the video is very good, I'm following the Bovingdon one for most features. Damn my whole evening gone to tank chats... Neil |
MW | 15/12/2017 21:37:28 |
![]() 2052 forum posts 56 photos | Posted by Neil Wyatt on 15/12/2017 20:44:02:
Damn my whole evening gone to tank chats... Neil Given how cool these photos are, I can think of worse ways to spend an evening Michael W |
Neil Wyatt | 15/12/2017 22:02:18 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | > That sharp internal corner below the front of the cupola would seem an odd feature for a tank if fixed. There's a half-round trough that runs across the right 2/3 of the top of the turret casting that shadow. I think it's probably some sort of cover for vent holes. Neil |
MW | 16/12/2017 13:41:00 |
![]() 2052 forum posts 56 photos | Can we have an object in the foreground like a penny, to compare the size of this turret, (is it all 3D printed or a modified kit?) It looks pretty chunky on that worktop! PS. with the position of those rivets it would suggest to me that the cupola was a fixed feature, possibly designed simply to give ample cover to anyone sitting/viewing out the top. Michael W
Edited By Michael-w on 16/12/2017 13:44:25 |
Mick B1 | 16/12/2017 15:23:39 |
2444 forum posts 139 photos | I can't imagine that a cupola would be fixed to show the commander only what's under his guns - you might as well put him in blinkers. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.