MW | 18/03/2016 20:26:16 |
![]() 2052 forum posts 56 photos | Hi, I recently picked up (what i think) is a Jones + Shipman milling vice, no makers marks, 150mm jaw width. A tad overkill? I've inspected it and it seems like a good vice. Michael W |
Ed Duffner | 19/03/2016 04:35:29 |
863 forum posts 104 photos | Hi Michael, I was thinking my 4 inch vertex was overkill. That's huge! Ed. |
Chris Evans 6 | 19/03/2016 09:24:35 |
![]() 2156 forum posts | Not overkill at all that is a nice vice and yes it does look to be a J&S. I like a vice of that pattern without the more usual two strips to rest your work on. So much easier if setting an angle wedge or little sine bar. Nice find. |
Michael Gilligan | 19/03/2016 09:34:00 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | ... It should preload the dovetails nicely MichaelG. |
Rik Shaw | 19/03/2016 09:51:00 |
![]() 1494 forum posts 403 photos | Michael - I have a 3.5 inch on mine and find it "just so" but f I were you I would carry on with this monster and see how you get on. My guess is that before very long you will find that the height of your new vice will start to cause problems even with the mill head at its highest setting. The positive side of course is that if your vice is sold on the auction site it would - with luck - get you enough cash to pay for a new three or four inch from say Axminster or similar. I only mention Axminster because I bought a 5" from them for my shaper a few months back when they were at an "offer" price and find it to be surprisingly accurate. Rik |
MW | 20/03/2016 15:37:04 |
![]() 2052 forum posts 56 photos | At 45kgs it's certainly going to load the slides nicely. It also came with a swivel base but alas it was too big for my tee slots, they could be carefully trimmed and thinned down provided i don't disturb the parallel alignment of the tabs. Thanks for the comments, Michael W |
Spurry | 20/03/2016 15:57:06 |
227 forum posts 72 photos | Michael, I think you owe it to yourself to have a requirement for a larger machine to fit the vice. Pete |
JasonB | 20/03/2016 16:05:34 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | It may well load the dovetails but I would check the front to back tram of the table with all that weight hanging over the front. |
Tim Stevens | 20/03/2016 16:10:23 |
![]() 1779 forum posts 1 photos | I suspect that you will find it necessary to have the vice only in the centre of the table. Anywhere else and the offset load on the ways will make it very hard to turn the handles. If you don't intend to get a much bigger machine, you might consider advertising (here?) for a swap with a smaller version. Just a thought, Tim |
Michael Gilligan | 20/03/2016 16:53:34 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by JasonB on 20/03/2016 16:05:34:
It may well load the dovetails but I would check the front to back tram of the table with all that weight hanging over the front. . Me too ... [Note: I did not mention the direction of loading] I was initially wondering about the reduction in feed-screw life. MichaelG. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.