john kennedy 1 | 29/11/2014 18:56:16 |
![]() 214 forum posts 24 photos | Will soon have the cylinders finished and my thoughts turning to the pistons. I've chopped the cylinders out of a solid iron tractor weight that a farmer gave to me. In the series in M.E. packing and O rings are shown as 2 methods, in detail for bronze running in bronze but no details of iron running in iron other than the suggestion of using iron rings. I have in the past successfully made iron rings for small i/c engines so I'm not worried about actually making them. The pistons are 1 1/4" d x 1/2" thick. Is there any advantage to having 2 rings in each piston or will 1 be ok ?? Hope someone can advise please .. John
|
JasonB | 29/11/2014 20:02:45 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | Two allows thering joints to be staggered so less blow past. |
Henry Wood | 29/11/2014 20:42:30 |
![]() 22 forum posts 1 photos | Hello John You are correct, in my write up I just mentioned if the builder prefers to use cast iron for the cylinders, then I suggested the use of cast iron rings. I used cast iron on my simplex which has been and still is running since 1976 on my home made cast iron rings with no loss of performance. I put two rings on the piston and made them 1/16"thk. x 3/32" wide and staggered the gaps as pointed out by Jason B to help prevent blow past. Whether having two rings is better than one apart from the blow past as mentioned and having one extra in case one should break, then I would not like to say. Again, I point out the need for an oiling point on the steam chest for giving a dose of oil after running is finished to prevent rusting. I hope this is of help to you. Cheers Henry
|
john kennedy 1 | 30/11/2014 00:35:33 |
![]() 214 forum posts 24 photos | Many thanks to you both, that's killed a pig .. John |
Ian S C | 30/11/2014 09:52:02 |
![]() 7468 forum posts 230 photos | Cast iron on cast iron is the best bearing surface. I had not seen it until I rebuilt a Stuart Turner S9 steam engine, this engine has a 1 1/2" dia piston 3/8" deep, with a 1/4" ring groove, in that I put 2 x 1/8" wide cast iron rings, when fitted the gaps were staggered 180*. Ian S C |
john kennedy 1 | 30/11/2014 21:11:18 |
![]() 214 forum posts 24 photos | Ian, did you put 2 rings in 1 groove only because it was a narrow piston or is there any other advantage? |
fizzy | 30/11/2014 21:19:27 |
![]() 1860 forum posts 121 photos | JK - If you struggle to make the rings or to fit them without them braking you could do a lot worse than use packing instead. Its available ont tebay for little money and it is so much easier. I was very wary of this method until I tried it for myself, excellent results! |
Ian S C | 01/12/2014 10:58:36 |
![]() 7468 forum posts 230 photos | The engine was a rebuild, and the piston had been made with the 1/4" wide groove, is seems Stuart Turner used the method, and it works ok, and in a piston 3/8" wide there is little room for two 1/8" grooves. I did some repair work on a ST Progress vertical slide valve engine, it to had a single groove, but I packed that with Teflon plumbers tape. I could have made and fitted two cast iron rings, but the cylinder on that little (1/2" bore), is bronze. Ian S C |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.