JasonB | 01/08/2021 07:37:58 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | So with the thread allowed to be up to 0.002" undersize it is quite possible RDG are testing their goods on Myford spindles and it just so happens theirs are towards the bottom of that tolerance and those who have a job getting them to fit have spindles that are on size or only just below. |
Michael Gilligan | 01/08/2021 08:33:36 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Yes, that looks likely, Jason Which is why, on p1, I wrote: That’s the disappointing bit ^^^ Supplier needs to understand GO/NOGO gauging MichaelG. |
Richard Jarvis | 01/08/2021 08:46:38 |
25 forum posts 6 photos | The disappointing bit for me is that they were adamant no problem existed and it was ok, even though someone else had exactly the same problem that week. It has been mentioned faulty goods should be sent back, but delivery to me can take over a week and if I have to stand return cost you are soon out of pocket. Thanks Richard |
Michael Gilligan | 01/08/2021 08:59:01 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Richard Jarvis on 01/08/2021 08:46:38:
The disappointing bit for me is that they were adamant no problem existed and it was ok, even though someone else had exactly the same problem that week. . Yes, that’s what I meant by : “Supplier needs to understand GO/NOGO gauging” [emphasis added] MichaelG. |
Emgee | 01/08/2021 09:09:56 |
2610 forum posts 312 photos | Posted by Richard Jarvis on 01/08/2021 08:46:38:
The disappointing bit for me is that they were adamant no problem existed and it was ok, even though someone else had exactly the same problem that week. It has been mentioned faulty goods should be sent back, but delivery to me can take over a week and if I have to stand return cost you are soon out of pocket. Thanks Richard You shouldn't have to pay return postage for faulty goods, that should be paid by the seller. Emgee |
Graham Meek | 01/08/2021 11:56:11 |
714 forum posts 414 photos | I did point out back on page 2 of this post. That checking a part, using another machined part was "asking for trouble". There are clearly Spindles in use that are larger than the "Inspection Part". It certainly does not take much to work that out. If a part is going to be checked this way then the Inspection Part needs to have the largest permissible sizes, or MMC, otherwise this check is useless. As a small Spindle will pass all the parts. Regards Gray,
|
Michael Gilligan | 01/08/2021 14:11:02 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Graham Meek on 01/08/2021 11:56:11:
I did point out back on page 2 of this post. That checking a part, using another machined part was "asking for trouble". There are clearly Spindles in use that are larger than the "Inspection Part". [...] . Quite so, Gray ... and it was good to have your endorsement of my point MichaelG. |
Howard Lewis | 02/08/2021 08:54:44 |
7227 forum posts 21 photos | If the spindle being used as a gauge is not hardened, it will not be much use as a gauge for long, if at all. Every chuck or backplate that is screwed on and off will cause wear, even if only a minute amount, but the later backolates will be checked against a worn thread and so pass although actually under the drawing minimum size. A proper GO / NO GO screw thread gauge will be hardened, to avoid this, AND should be checked periodically to ensure that it is in calibration, for high volume manufacture. In this case, that appears not to be the situation! RDG are the vendor, but the manufacturer appears not be ISO 9000 certified, judged by these complaints.. "You write down what the procedures are, and then you demonstrate to the ISO inspector that you are working to them". Howard |
JasonB | 02/08/2021 09:32:08 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | But if they wrote down that they would test with an old Myford spindle and did that then they would still be OK under ISO 9001. It does not say what method to use just that you follow what you say you will use. |
Michael Gilligan | 02/08/2021 09:49:20 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Spot on, Jason Been there, done that, got the certification. [ including, for a Marketing Operations department, where the written ‘Procedure’ was to go out and negotiate with the potential customer ] MichaelG. |
Tony Pratt 1 | 02/08/2021 10:55:45 |
2319 forum posts 13 photos | Any competent manufacturer of say 'Myford backplates' would require a properly toleranced drawing to quote against because as we know nothing can be made to an exact size Tony |
roy entwistle | 02/08/2021 11:30:38 |
1716 forum posts | Surely it's better for a backplate to be too tight, at least it can be made to fit. If it was sloppy to start with it's worse than useless. Roy |
Michael Gilligan | 02/08/2021 11:57:05 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Richard Jarvis on 28/07/2021 13:04:13:
Posted by JA on 28/07/2021 12:56:21:
Do RDG/Myford read these postings? Perhaps they should. JA Well they did not answer my last correspondence seven days ago so I decided to have a go myself with help from the group. . Just picking-up this point : As stated many times before … RDG and Myford are two separate Limited Companies. MichaelG.
|
Graham Meek | 02/08/2021 12:35:37 |
714 forum posts 414 photos | I think an assumption has been made about ISO 9001, as I do not see any ISO 9001 accreditation on the vendors website, unless I have missed something. The certification process allows for the withdraw of the accreditation if it can be proven the laid out procedures have not been followed. It costs money to acquire this standard, and there is an ongoing cost for checks by a Quality auditor. Those companies who get the standard, make sure they do not loose it. Regards Gray, |
Richard Jarvis | 02/08/2021 12:58:59 |
25 forum posts 6 photos | When I first started thinking about replacing my original Chuck about two months ago, I recall the RDG advert stating that the backplate was machined by one of there engineers. I might be wrong but I am not convinced that RDG machine the backplate themselves, but they come with the Chuck from the manufacturer. I might be totally wrong of course.
Thanks Richard |
JohnF | 02/08/2021 13:03:12 |
![]() 1243 forum posts 202 photos | Something similar came up on another post relating to ER chucks, accuracy TIR and fit. I had a problem with an ER chuck purchased from and made in Europe -- I eventually found out they were using UNF form threads instead of Whitworth form so I do wonder if some of the Far East product has the same problem ? During my conversations with the producers of the ER chuck I acquired the correct thread tolerance dimensions for Go / No Go gauges for the "Myford" thread and made a GO gauge as close to these dimensions as possible with the equipment I have -- I am confident its close enough to the limits specified for practical purposes. I used a full form tip to make the gauge measuring over wires with an indicator micrometer. The sizes were calculated as a favour to me by a UK gauge maker so I don't feel it would be right to publicise them, however if any forum members want them please PM me with an email address and I will pass them on. Why any commercial company manufacturing a precision product would operate without the proper gauges is beyond belief !! Another problem I have found with much of the imported Myford spindle tooling offered by suppliers is the register diameter on both male and female units is woefully outside the tolerance it needs to be to ensure TIR accuracy Regards John Photo of my gauge |
speelwerk | 02/08/2021 13:21:09 |
464 forum posts 2 photos | It is not only imported spindle tooling or RDG/new Myford giving problems. Very long time ago bought a new Burnerd chuck with fitted back plate direct from old Myford. Cannot remember the error the chuck had on the back plate but had to redo it to get what I wanted. Niko, Edited By speelwerk on 02/08/2021 13:22:21 |
brian jones 11 | 02/08/2021 19:05:18 |
347 forum posts 62 photos | Well long suffering Myfordians, I can report 100% success with getting my new chuck to fit onto my spindle. I ran the new 1 1/8 tap i ordered through the adapter plate and 10 mins later my chuck fitted back on with the precision of a swiss sewing machine So guys thats what worked for me , hope it helps, i also eased up 2 faceplates i had which were stiff So the moral here, if you buy a new adapter plate dont expect it to fit properly without some work. |
old mart | 03/08/2021 20:40:45 |
4655 forum posts 304 photos | Good result, and lucky to be able to get hold of a tap. |
brian jones 11 | 03/08/2021 20:50:12 |
347 forum posts 62 photos | I plan to sell it on after a breather at cost less 10%, as new only used to skim three threads 1 careful owner. Will advise here when ready. I doubt I shall need it again only to leave it idle on a shelf I propose to invite pms and give an Ebay site to contact for easy payment and guarantee Hope it may get some else out of trouble and then they can pass it on like this to other members.
|
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.