I need to cut chamfers into x64 pieces of mild steel - any advice?
John Smith 47 | 06/09/2021 23:07:20 |
393 forum posts 12 photos | Posted by Bill Phinn on 06/09/2021 22:19:51:
Posted by John Smith 47 on 06/09/2021 21:41:46:
You linked to an 8mm "Busch Burr 413 Stone Setting" tool on Cooksongold. Is 8mm the diameter you are recommending? Material "steel". The 8mm one will be easiest to set up [you'll have a comparatively long, easily sightable 45 degree slope to work off], but since the chamfer you need is only around 1.4 mm in extent, you can go down to a 4mm setting burr [I say this based on my own full set of Busch 413 burrs] and still do what you need to do with it. It appears the Busch 413 burr range are made of tungsten vanadium steel In spite of my mention earlier of HSS burrs as a potentially more long-lasting option than the Busch 413's, I don't actually know if "tungsten vanadium" burrs are inferior for your purposes to those varieties of the same style of burr described as "HSS". Other, more knowledgeable, forum members are in a better position to advise you on that. Edited By Bill Phinn on 06/09/2021 22:21:31 That's very helpful - thank you. One more question, what speed should I be using if I do use a Proxxon MF70 (which seems to spin at 5,000 to 20,000 rpm, albeit with (if memory serves) just a 100watt motor, so presumably the ability to generate a lot of heat but without very much torque...) |
John Smith 47 | 06/09/2021 23:23:38 |
393 forum posts 12 photos | Posted by Bill Phinn on 06/09/2021 22:19:51:
Posted by John Smith 47 on 06/09/2021 21:41:46:
You linked to an 8mm "Busch Burr 413 Stone Setting" tool on Cooksongold. Is 8mm the diameter you are recommending? Material "steel". The 8mm one will be easiest to set up [you'll have a comparatively long, easily sightable 45 degree slope to work off], but since the chamfer you need is only around 1.4 mm in extent, you can go down to a 4mm setting burr [I say this based on my own full set of Busch 413 burrs] and still do what you need to do with it. It appears the Busch 413 burr range are made of tungsten vanadium steel In spite of my mention earlier of HSS burrs as a potentially more long-lasting option than the Busch 413's, I don't actually know if "tungsten vanadium" burrs are inferior for your purposes to those varieties of the same style of burr described as "HSS". Other, more knowledgeable, forum members are in a better position to advise you on that. Edited By Bill Phinn on 06/09/2021 22:21:31 Btw, it turns out the burrs are all the same price between 4mm and 8mm. Which would you advise me to use? J |
Pete. | 06/09/2021 23:33:51 |
![]() 910 forum posts 303 photos | Posted by John Smith 47 on 06/09/2021 18:48:57:
Posted by Pete. on 06/09/2021 18:18:06:
Are you using mild steel on a diamond stone? This would explain you noticing the coarse side not being as effective as it was new. Er yes. It that likely to be problematic? I thought that they are designed for sharpening knives - if so why would some relatively soft mild steel be a problem? John, diamond stones are intended for hard materials, when you use them it creates fine particles that form a slurry with the lapping fluid, this washes away. When you use soft mild steel, it gums up the diamond stone, this is most probably why you've noticed it performing less well in a very short space of time. |
William Chitham | 07/09/2021 12:56:15 |
156 forum posts 56 photos | I have skipped through this thread rather but if I have the gist of it correct then maybe this machine currently for sale on the Home Workshop **LINK**site might serve: For Sale: Gravograph bevelling machine
|
John Smith 47 | 07/09/2021 16:35:30 |
393 forum posts 12 photos | Posted by William Chitham on 07/09/2021 12:56:15:
I have skipped through this thread rather but if I have the gist of it correct then maybe this machine currently for sale on the Home Workshop **LINK**site might serve: For Sale: Gravograph bevelling machine
|
John Haine | 07/09/2021 16:45:10 |
5563 forum posts 322 photos | Video at **LINK** Basically it uses a pointed engraving-style "D bit" with a 90 degree point. This is rotating in a recess inn the base which has a fence machined into it. You hold the material to be cut against the fence and push it past the cutter which mills the edge. As the material is hand held and fingers are close to the cutter you'd need to be very careful especially cutting steel where the cutting forces will be much larger than the engraving plastic shown. But basically a variant on the "milling with a mitred cutter" approach. For production I do suggest that you consult on the best manufacturing approach for this component - which may involve a re-design. |
John Smith 47 | 07/09/2021 16:47:28 |
393 forum posts 12 photos | Posted by Pete. on 06/09/2021 23:33:51:
Posted by John Smith 47 on 06/09/2021 18:48:57:
Posted by Pete. on 06/09/2021 18:18:06:
Are you using mild steel on a diamond stone? This would explain you noticing the coarse side not being as effective as it was new. Er yes. It that likely to be problematic? I thought that they are designed for sharpening knives - if so why would some relatively soft mild steel be a problem? John, diamond stones are intended for hard materials, when you use them it creates fine particles that form a slurry with the lapping fluid, this washes away. When you use soft mild steel, it gums up the diamond stone, this is most probably why you've noticed it performing less well in a very short space of time. Good to know. Edited By John Smith 47 on 07/09/2021 16:50:49 |
Bill Phinn | 07/09/2021 18:44:19 |
1076 forum posts 129 photos | Posted by John Smith 47 on 06/09/2021 23:07:20:One more question, what speed should I be using if I do use a Proxxon MF70 (which seems to spin at 5,000 to 20,000 rpm, albeit with (if memory serves) just a 100watt motor, so presumably the ability to generate a lot of heat but without very much torque...)
The slowest speed available, and with plenty of good lube such as Rocol RTD. Posted by John Smith 47 on 06/09/2021 23:23:38:
Btw, it turns out the burrs are all the same price between 4mm and 8mm. Which would you advise me to use?
Yes, the price of all of them at Cookson is equally scandalous. HS Walsh would be a better source. To save money and to keep the speed down at the cutting edge I'd buy/use the 4mm ones. If you do choose the Proxxon route with these burrs you're going to need to get on top of several things: 1. As the metal is very thin at 1mm you're going to have to have very little excess protruding from the top of the vice [yes, you'll need a vice] if you want to avoid chatter. 2. The burrs have fairly long shanks - too long, frankly, to give the required stiffness at the cutting end when held in the standard Proxxon collet. The solution is to cut the shank short to minimize stick-out. 3. You're going to need some way of clocking in your vice so that its jaws are perfectly parallel with long edge of the table. Once you've achieved this you'll be able to cut the chamfer on a long piece all in one go and cut it into sections of the desired length afterwards. For long runs I tend to use a cordless drill on the nut on the end of the x axis as a powerfeed. |
Robert Butler | 07/09/2021 19:44:34 |
511 forum posts 6 photos | The Proxon Mill is around £350 the Gravograph device is £150 + carriage. The OP suggested he didn't wish to acquire equipment which would have no further use after completing the exercise. The Proxon depending on future intentions may be of no further use as it is only intended for light use on small components and £200 more expensive! The Gravograph machine would appear to be exactly what is required and the Proxon a compromise. If the project is of prime importance buy the Gravograph, job done. Robert Butler
|
John Smith 47 | 08/09/2021 11:46:49 |
393 forum posts 12 photos | Hello All However I shall get back with some photos once I have got some results. Although fwiw, most of the kit has not yet actually arrived in any case.
PS If nothing else I should have a good set of tools when this is all over! |
Tony Pratt 1 | 08/09/2021 12:47:07 |
2319 forum posts 13 photos | You can never have too many tools! Tony |
John Smith 47 | 09/09/2021 12:40:10 |
393 forum posts 12 photos | Posted by Tony Pratt 1 on 08/09/2021 12:47:07:
You can never have too many tools! Tony Yup. ...And you can never have a large enough workshop in which to store 'em! |
John Smith 47 | 16/09/2021 23:49:19 |
393 forum posts 12 photos | UPDATE:
[The green arrow shows the small amount of the original face that I am deliberately leaving.] But it's good enough to take the parts to my diamond whetstone to finish off. PROBLEM SOLVED |
JasonB | 17/09/2021 06:55:19 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | Try the same setup but on the belt, it will cut faster and you won't have the velcro issue, that's what I used when I did my example. |
Dave S | 17/09/2021 07:20:25 |
433 forum posts 95 photos | And why I suggested a belt. If you get the direction of travel wrong you might still get some rounding - you want the belt travelling: \ Dave |
John Smith 47 | 20/09/2021 14:59:31 |
393 forum posts 12 photos | Posted by JasonB on 17/09/2021 06:55:19:
Try the same setup but on the belt, it will cut faster and you won't have the velcro issue, that's what I used when I did my example. What was putting me off using using the belt is that there is always a slight 'thump' where the sandpaper has been joined. But, yes... good thinking, now that the slight curse of velcro has emerged.
And I can't find any way to tighten the belt... other than using the belt tightening lever which has a fixed action. Do you think that there is a meaningful difference the size that manufacturers make their sanding belts between "914 mm" and "915 mm" ? J Edited By John Smith 47 on 20/09/2021 15:01:54 |
Tony Pratt 1 | 20/09/2021 15:13:36 |
2319 forum posts 13 photos | Do you think that there is a meaningful difference the size that manufacturers make their sanding belts between "914 mm" and "915 mm" ? J No Tony |
Rod Renshaw | 20/09/2021 15:22:43 |
438 forum posts 2 photos | Usual advice from the makers of diamond "whetstones" and wheels is to use them only for hard materials (carbide or ceramic etc) and not steels which are mostly "soft" in this context, and to use only very light pressure. Diamond is very hard but rather brittle, too much pressure will either fracture the diamonds or tear them from the wheel, and as has been said soft materials will clog the surface. Rod |
John Smith 47 | 20/09/2021 16:20:04 |
393 forum posts 12 photos | Posted by Rod Renshaw on 20/09/2021 15:22:43:
Usual advice from the makers of diamond "whetstones" and wheels is to use them only for hard materials (carbide or ceramic etc) and not steels which are mostly "soft" in this context, and to use only very light pressure. Diamond is very hard but rather brittle, too much pressure will either fracture the diamonds or tear them from the wheel, and as has been said soft materials will clog the surface. Rod My SHARPAL Diamond Whetstone is specifically designed for use with knives which one tends to find are made out of steel. I can see no mention of "a very light pressure". In fact I have heard people claim that a light pressure is bad for a diamond whetstone and that they prefer to be worked hard. J |
John Smith 47 | 20/09/2021 16:27:59 |
393 forum posts 12 photos | Fwiw, I have managed to get a bit more tension into the belt by jamming something (a nut & bolt) under the spring. ==> The ("915mm" |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.