By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
Forum sponsored by:
Forum sponsored by Forum House Ad Zone

Gauge Blocks

All Topics | Latest Posts

Search for:  in Thread Title in  
Ian S C10/01/2015 11:04:04
avatar
7468 forum posts
230 photos

When we were setting up our engine/propeller over haul shop back in the 1960's someone mentioned that two surface tables similar to the one with the bent prop on it were wrung together and hung above the entrance of the factory they were made in.... maybe, maybe not.

Ian S C rex aviation engine and propeller shop (640x427).jpg

Hopper10/01/2015 13:12:39
avatar
7881 forum posts
397 photos
Posted by Russell Eberhardt on 10/01/2015 10:35:29:
Posted by Jerry Wray on 09/01/2015 14:27:32:

Oh No! Not van de Waals forces! There has been much correspondence amongst physicist disputing the existence of these. Perhaps we should all back-off until we have read the latest research papers, Then we might be able to take a view.

For the uninitiated these forces have been in dispute for at least forty years.

Jerry

Well, they certainly existed 50 years ago when I studied physics at university although it has only recently become possible to measure them. Of course the theory has been disputed. That's science. If we accept everything as true we don't progress.

Try telling the geckos that the forces don't exist and they'll all fall off the glass of their vivariums!

Russell.

And off the walls and ceilings of my workshop here in the tropincs, including the motion detectors of my newly installed burglar alarm with rather annoying results!

Larry Coleman 110/01/2015 14:35:03
avatar
102 forum posts
59 photos

I think we all may be missing the point here, Forget the oil, Has anyone thought we may have improved the way a surface finish is accomplished as well as the end result.

Now I do know if you want to remove oil of a surface Ultrasonic Vapour degreaser is the way using freon 13. The military eccept it. And a vapour degreaser cleans in pure fluid because it is condensed by the cooling ring.

Anyway a very interesting conversation.

Larry

Neil Lickfold10/01/2015 22:57:08
1025 forum posts
204 photos

Jason interesting post.

So I just got 15 blocks and cleaned them as I normally do, then assembled them. My mic reads to .001mm,

Then I redid the test again, and this time put a thin film of non scented baby oil on them. I got the same measurement.

I really was expecting a measurable error of at least 4 to 5 um. I put together 1.01 to 1.6 and got 17.555mm should have been 17.550, but with the error of the blocks added up that makes it about right. I think baby oil is parafin oil as it just calls it light mineral oil.

Neil L

jason udall11/01/2015 10:28:39
2032 forum posts
41 photos
My point really is..we are not alone in considering the impact. .it seems to have been an issue in at least 1922..

Michael Gilligan11/01/2015 11:25:36
avatar
23121 forum posts
1360 photos

Posted by Michael Gilligan on 01/11/2014 15:02:05:

... Careful reading of Appendix B in the NIST document [referenced above] should clarify the matter.

... it's only a couple of pages; unless you follow all the references

.

Quite so, Jason

MichaelG.

.

For those who didn't read it, here is the reference again.

jason udall11/01/2015 20:31:57
2032 forum posts
41 photos
Michael...facinating..in particular the assessment of contact area from resistivity. ..
Particularly liked the noted reduction in wring as the slip "wears" or possibly "polishes". ...
Michael Gilligan20/02/2015 22:54:13
avatar
23121 forum posts
1360 photos

Just a quick PostScript

[we don't really want to resume the debate, do we]

Have a look at this, from NPL.

MichaelG.

Neil Wyatt21/02/2015 16:21:46
avatar
19226 forum posts
749 photos
86 articles

It's very telling that the NPL talk of 'achieving an uncertainty' rather than 'achieving an accuracy'.

Neil

Michael Gilligan21/02/2015 16:59:21
avatar
23121 forum posts
1360 photos
Posted by Neil Wyatt on 21/02/2015 16:21:46:

It's very telling that the NPL talk of 'achieving an uncertainty' rather than 'achieving an accuracy'.

.

It's much better use of English, I would say.

MichaelG.

.

Edit: This is a good place to start.

Edited By Michael Gilligan on 21/02/2015 17:07:33

All Topics | Latest Posts

Please login to post a reply.

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!

Find Model Engineer & Model Engineers' Workshop

Sign up to our Newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.

You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
cowells
Sarik
MERIDIENNE EXHIBITIONS LTD
Subscription Offer

Latest "For Sale" Ads
Latest "Wanted" Ads
Get In Touch!

Do you want to contact the Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop team?

You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.

Click THIS LINK for full contact details.

For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.

Digital Back Issues

Social Media online

'Like' us on Facebook
Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter
 Twitter Logo

Pin us on Pinterest

 

Donate

donate