sean logie | 03/09/2016 14:13:13 |
![]() 608 forum posts 7 photos | Posted by Bazyle on 03/09/2016 12:41:43:
More photos. You have the apron but are missing the entire saddle and cross slide. The other part is only the top of the topslide which also needs a base. Most likely to get a whole topslide which appear every couple of weeks on ebay. Remember ML7 and super7 parts are not compatible. Beware. This is not what it says. Though it might fit (with a LOT of work) and might have been stripped off a Myford it is definitely not an original, not complete, and way overpriced for a few miscellaneous lumps of metal. the topslide i have linked will do then Bazyle ?
sean |
sean logie | 03/09/2016 14:17:02 |
![]() 608 forum posts 7 photos | Posted by sean logie on 03/09/2016 14:13:13:
Posted by Bazyle on 03/09/2016 12:41:43:
More photos. You have the apron but are missing the entire saddle and cross slide. The other part is only the top of the topslide which also needs a base. Most likely to get a whole topslide which appear every couple of weeks on ebay. Remember ML7 and super7 parts are not compatible. Beware. This is not what it says. Though it might fit (with a LOT of work) and might have been stripped off a Myford it is definitely not an original, not complete, and way overpriced for a few miscellaneous lumps of metal. the topslide i have linked will do then Bazyle ?
found this also https://www.gumtree.com/p/lathes/slide-from-old-myford-lathe/1183325768
sean
|
Bazyle | 03/09/2016 16:32:21 |
![]() 6956 forum posts 229 photos | The gumtree link looks pretty good but is it actually myford? The advert says the lathe was sold so was that without its saddle? Perhaps the lathe sold was a myford and this was a non-myford part that happened to be with it and was therefore assumed to be myford by association not wisdom. One thing that puzzles me about it is I don't see screw holes in the second photo for attaching the apron so was perhaps attached from the front. It would adapt if the size of the V on the saddle will match so worth a call to the seller to get a measurement. Note the first photo shows the gib strip which is needed but if the V is a little too wide you can take up an eighth with a thicker one. The second photo shows the back of a dial so if it is myford it is the 'superior model' that actually had one. Not sure which topslide you linked to. I linked to one what would do and is the slightly better slot plus hole fixing type but there seem to be two bidders already. The screw only that Jon Gibbs linked is nice, The later development I think but you need rather more than just that. |
Georgineer | 03/09/2016 23:23:47 |
652 forum posts 33 photos | If I can address various points from various posts: The parts Bazyle linked to under 'this is not what it says' are not Myford. The seller tells me that he assumed them to be Myford because they were in a box with an ML1 bed. The '80 thou per turn' dial was an approximation by Myford to the 83.3 thou actually given by the 12 tpi thread on ML1234. Early lathes didn't have a dial at all. There was a seller on ebay making resettable dials with 83 divisions, but I haven't seen them advertised lately. From my researches(and I am perfectly willing to be challenged) I believe that the ML3 was the 'Standard' version of the 'Superior' ML4 with the same centre height, bed length, mandrel threads and other major dimensions. The only differences I can find are that until 1938 the ML3 headstock was cast in rather than bolted on, and that it used plain bearings in the cast iron head rather than the ML4's bronze bearings. Some people favour this arrangement as it lasts longer. The ML3 was discontinued in 1941. Accordingly I believe that any ML4 part should fit the OP's ML3. The topslide thread, handle and bracket shown in the link are attractive because they are late ones with the cast bracket bearing an engraved line to aid reading the dial. Earlier ones had a flat plate with no marking at all. The ML1 and ML2 were smaller versions of the ML3 and ML4, and I believe that their history ran in parallel. They had a 3 1/8" centre height (compared with 3 1/2" ), measured 15" between centres (compared with 24" ) and had 3 1/2" cross slide travel (compared with 4 1/2" ). All early ML1234 lathes had a choice of a 7/8" x 9 tpi or 7/8" x 12 tpi Whitworth mandrel thread. The later ML4 (and I presume ML2) had a 1 1/8" x 12 tpi thread identical to the ML7 but the register was 1 1/8" diameter, not the 1 1/4" of the ML7. This means that ML7 fitments will thread onto the ML4 nose, but do not engage with the register. It should be possible to secure a collar to the existing register and turn it to the ML7 dimensions, making it truly interchangeable. The later ML4 was available with tumbler reverse, though I don't know when it was introduced or whether it was available on the other models. I hope this clarifies some of the puzzles. George Edited By JasonB on 04/09/2016 13:43:51 |
Georgineer | 03/09/2016 23:26:30 |
652 forum posts 33 photos | Is it possible to edit a post? The forum software has decided to change my closing parentheses into stupid smily face things. George |
Nicholas Farr | 04/09/2016 08:42:41 |
![]() 3988 forum posts 1799 photos | Posted by Georgineer on 03/09/2016 23:26:30:
Is it possible to edit a post? The forum software has decided to change my closing parentheses into stupid smily face things. George Hi George, you have about half an hour after you have posted to edit it, just click on the edit post in the green bar, so you would have had time to edit your previous post. After this timeout, only moderators can edit your posts. Regards Nick. |
Ian S C | 04/09/2016 13:15:32 |
![]() 7468 forum posts 230 photos | At the end of the text in the brackets, don't put a punctuation mark before the closing bracket, different marks, and bracket give different smily faces. Ian S C |
JasonB | 04/09/2016 13:51:13 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | From the other thread
Sean said What is this Speedy Builder replied - Er , looks like a top slide clamp to lock the slide for milling ?? J |
sparky mike | 04/09/2016 18:22:40 |
259 forum posts 77 photos | Hi Sean, I have just added an album entitled ML4 parts. photos may help you on your lathe. My lathe is mostly original with a few additions. Mike. Edited By sparky mike on 04/09/2016 18:23:22 |
sean logie | 04/09/2016 18:34:42 |
![]() 608 forum posts 7 photos | Posted by sparky mike on 04/09/2016 18:22:40:
Hi Sean, I have just added an album entitled ML4 parts. photos may help you on your lathe. My lathe is mostly original with a few additions. Mike. Edited By sparky mike on 04/09/2016 18:23:22 you have a pm
|
sean logie | 04/09/2016 18:38:18 |
![]() 608 forum posts 7 photos | I'v sent you a PM Mike |
Neil Wyatt | 04/09/2016 19:25:39 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | > The '80 thou per turn' dial was an approximation by Myford to the 83.3 thou actually given by the 12 tpi thread on ML1234. LOL! Elsewhere someone said they couldn't accept a Chinese lathe that had dials approximating 1mm to 40 thou, a much smaller error than the Myford approach! Neil |
sean logie | 06/09/2016 07:50:38 |
![]() 608 forum posts 7 photos | Right ... getting desperate now lol , is there anyway of getting a ml7 topslide and the topslide baseplate to work on my ml3 cross carrage. . I came across a guy that makes discontinued parts for my lathe ,I've emailed him ,but surely that'll cost a fortune and I'm on a tight budget for this project. What do you guys think . Sean |
sean logie | 06/09/2016 07:52:15 |
![]() 608 forum posts 7 photos | I meant cross slide Sean |
Brian Wood | 06/09/2016 08:30:42 |
2742 forum posts 39 photos | Hello Sean, |
Bazyle | 06/09/2016 09:53:50 |
![]() 6956 forum posts 229 photos | He is missing the saddle.so no V to measure but Lathes.co.uk says ML7 parts aren't compatible here. The Gumtree link was the most promising but needed measurement and communication. You can't hurry this if you are expecting to get a specific original saddle there might only be one every 6 months. It will be cheaper to buy another lathe than custom or new parts. Since almost no lathes ever get separated from their saddle when someone decides to break a lathe and sell the parts there shouldn't be much demand for this part. As you could do with some local help and advice you need to put out feelers for other technical people near you who are not necessarily making it obvious but may have a lathe and other tools. eg aircraft modellers, car restorers, farmers, agricultural engineers, builders. |
sean logie | 06/09/2016 10:11:05 |
![]() 608 forum posts 7 photos | There's a ml2 that's been fitted out with ml7 parts ,I can't remember where I sawas it , hence the reason I'm asking about the topslide and top slide mounting plate . Sean |
Bazyle | 06/09/2016 10:53:37 |
![]() 6956 forum posts 229 photos | The ML7 topslide base has a spigot on the underside see last photo on this listing. and is waaay more expensive than a ML1234 one. Any small flat bottomed one would do - Chinese, hobbymat, Drummond etc but actually less common than the genuine article. The two main parts of the topslide should always be together and sold as a complete unit with screw etc. I did see one on ebay last month split in two and frankly think that is some shyster trying to screw someone for the second part after they bought the first. I'm getting a little confused by a few of the recent posts and the names being used so lets just clarify a few things. The big 3ft long lump is the 'bed'. The part you have still in your photo attached to the leadscrew that sits in front of the bed is the 'apron'. This attaches to the 'saddle' which sits on the bed (like horse saddle) so needs to have underneath the V to mate with the dovetail shape of the bed (Later Myfords were square not dovetail). The saddle will incorporate on top a male dovetail for the 'cross slide' that moves front to back. This cross slide has several T slots on top that are aligned down the length of the bed, not aligned along the length of the slide as with some new Chinese lathes. Any flat bottomed topslide or even a plain toolpost can be mounted using these T slots. "Topslide mounting plate" is not a standard term so I'm not quite sure if you are talking about the "topslide base" half of a topslide assembly or mixing up with the cross slide and really meaning the saddle.
|
sean logie | 06/09/2016 11:03:53 |
![]() 608 forum posts 7 photos | Interesting that any flat bottomed topslide will do so to speak . The part that the topslide sits on to allow it to swivel is the base/mount I'm meaning . Which one of the flat bottom topslide would you suggest . Feel like I'm getting somewhere now ,thanks for your input Bazyle Sean |
Bazyle | 06/09/2016 11:59:36 |
![]() 6956 forum posts 229 photos | Well I'm still going to say an original ML1234 because they are the cheapest and most common. I have one on my Drummond because of that. Just checked none on ebay at the moment and the last one I linked went for a lot more than I expected. Also I see there are a lot of ML7 bases on there which is perhaps why you asked. I do see this which is too small but shows all the bits you are missing. I keep forgetting the other bit. That photo above of the two bits of iron are probably a cross slide screw cutting stop. I've not heard of one for a myford like that but if you google "boxford screwcutting stop" images you see the equivalent with its centre screw which is why it probably isn't compatible with a myford. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.