Kenneth Deighton | 15/09/2014 20:04:23 |
69 forum posts | When using a Myford fixed steady (1412) on my ML7R , I find it very inconvenient to keep tapping the lower supports to centralize the metal, has anyone made adjustable threaded ones to replace the solid lower supports ? any advice would be appreciated. Thankyou. |
Clive Hartland | 15/09/2014 21:27:39 |
![]() 2929 forum posts 41 photos | Kenneth, when i set up the fixed steady I put the job in the chuck and set the fixed steady right up against the chuck jaws and adjust the sliding jaws at that position. Once the jaws are locked in position I then set the fixed steady up in its working position. Generally i find it works quite well. There will be other ways of doing it as forum members post their methods. Clive |
"Bill Hancox" | 15/09/2014 23:00:12 |
![]() 257 forum posts 77 photos | Kenneth In addition, ensure the work has been turned concentric to center where the fixed steady jaws will come to bear and keep the jaws well oiled where they contact the work. Bill |
Michael Gilligan | 15/09/2014 23:18:19 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Kenneth, By some serendipitous coincidence, I happened upon this Myford Patent a few days ago. You may find it interesting. MichaelG. |
Harold Hall 1 | 16/09/2014 09:56:33 |
418 forum posts 4 photos | You may find Kenneth my web pages on using fixed and travelling steadies useful. This can be found here Incidentally, if you need to support a part quite close to the chuck then a three jaw chuck is unlikely to be accurate enough. This, especially at larger diameters and in particular if the reverse jaws have to be used. My web pages cover this and many other aspects of using steadies. The reason for this is that the workpiece is likely to walk out of the chuck jaws, and quite quickly if the error is too large. Also, unless the workpiece is supported by the tailstock centre, then Clive's method is essential in my opinion. Harold |
Kenneth Deighton | 16/09/2014 20:03:46 |
69 forum posts | Thank you Michael , I think that this is the answer to my problem, also thanks to all the other friends thoughts
Ken.. |
Neil Wyatt | 16/09/2014 20:45:58 |
![]() 19226 forum posts 749 photos 86 articles | That patent idea looks very fiddly. How about the mini-lathe style that uses a threaded adjuster through the end of the steady finger and screwing into a hole in the finger fixing bolt? The fingers have slots for the fixing bolts. They are very easy to adjust Neil P.S. simple mod for owners - saw or file off the front corners in the gap, then you can fit larger stock without threading on from the end and it won't compromise the strength of the steady casting. |
Enough! | 16/09/2014 22:26:33 |
1719 forum posts 1 photos | That looks exactly like the the (minilathe) steady that I modified to fit my ML7. I didn't think of opening the gap as you suggested though, Neil. Thanks for that. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.