Mark P. | 10/01/2014 17:46:37 |
![]() 634 forum posts 9 photos | Hi all. I have been making a set of 4 stainless pistons for my motorbike,on completion I find that they are all .03mm undersize they should be 30.18mm I've ended up with 30.15mm. The question is will they be OK to use or shall I remake them? I think that they should be OK as the seals should take up the.03. Regards Mark P. |
David Jupp | 10/01/2014 18:29:38 |
978 forum posts 26 photos | Since your life, and perhaps the lives of others could depend on the brakes, it might be better to make sure your new pistons are within the original dimensional specifications just to be sure (if you can find out what the spec was). I'd be surprised if anyone here will tell you it's OK - especially with no detail of the seal arrangement, fluid pressures etc. |
Ian P | 10/01/2014 19:25:38 |
![]() 2747 forum posts 123 photos | Whether 0.03mm difference matters can only be determined with reference to all the original data and its unlikely that you will be able to get that. First question though is, where did you get the 30.18 dimension from, was it by measuring the old piston? If it was then it seems an odd number. If you use the same instrument to measure the originals and the ones you have made then it does not matter that it is not calibrated to a traceable standard as you are just using it as a comparator really. If it were my vehicle I would accept that size difference and ride or drive it without the slightest concern (The diameter difference is less than a 0.1% change) Probably the most important single factor is the actual surface finish which needs to be perfect. Ian P
|
Mark P. | 10/01/2014 20:32:54 |
![]() 634 forum posts 9 photos | Hi Ian I got the dimension 30.18mm by measuring the origional piston, I suspect that the true size should be 30.00mm. I have a very very fine surface finish done with 24000 grade paper. I think I will go with them. Mark P. |
JasonB | 10/01/2014 20:46:23 |
![]() 25215 forum posts 3105 photos 1 articles | Nothing odd about 30.18mm though I suspect it should be 30.16mm which is 1 3/16" What make is the bike, would it have been imperial? What does your insurance company say about having home made parts? J Edited By JasonB on 10/01/2014 20:47:56 |
blowlamp | 10/01/2014 21:13:25 |
![]() 1885 forum posts 111 photos | If the pistons are a decent fit in the bore and are nicely gripped by the seals, then I can't see there being a problem. As the pressure increases the tighter the seal will hold against both piston and bore, due to the deformation of the seal.
Martin. |
Ian P | 10/01/2014 21:21:29 |
![]() 2747 forum posts 123 photos | Jason I only have casual knowledge of motorbikes but 'fitted with disk brakes made to imperial dimensions' does not seem likely. Good question about the insurance aspect but it must be possible to insure vehicles that the manufacturers parts are no longer available. I would rather trust parts I made myself than those from some backstreet operation. Ian P
|
Clive Hartland | 10/01/2014 22:18:27 |
![]() 2929 forum posts 41 photos | The seals will have a chamfer on the contact side and as the pressure of the brake is removed the chamfer draws the piston back a small amount to stop the piston and pad from binding on the disc. I doubt the 0.03mm will make the slightest difference to this action at all. If anything it may increase this drawback which may give you some extra movement when the brake is applied. Clive |
RJW | 10/01/2014 22:48:32 |
343 forum posts 36 photos | Almost there Clive, piston seals are generally of a square cross section, and it's the base of the seating groove in the caliper that's angled, this angle tilts the seal in the groove so that the inner edge (facing the inside of the caliper and bearing on the piston) is of a slightly smaller diameter! Such a miniscule difference in piston size in my view ain't going to cause any grief as long as there's no excessive wear in the caliper bore where it operates, the piston doesn't seal the bore, the seal does, but the clearance shouldn't be enough to cause the seal to be deformed by a sloppy piston fit and leak! As for 'home made', why not? as long as it's well machined and polished and of decent material who is to say it's not an aftermarket product, there are loads of companies making these products as conversions for the classic car market! John |
Bezzer | 10/01/2014 23:37:40 |
203 forum posts 16 photos | What bike? you'll find that the OE workshop manual and even a Haynes one has the brake piston tolerance sizes for most models. I've made stainless pistons for several of my past bikes using the manual specs. As an example a close one to the OP ones are 30.23 to 30.28mm on 4 pot Suzuki front calipers which is found in both Haynes and the OE manual.. Edited By Mick Berrisford on 10/01/2014 23:38:46 |
stevetee | 11/01/2014 01:36:31 |
145 forum posts 14 photos | 0.03mm sounds a bit like 0.0011" thats one and a tenth thouths in English. Just how accurate do you think they need to be? All machined parts have a tolerance .... a thou undersize is nothing, now if they were a bit oversize I would be more worried as they would be likely to sieze in the casting as the pistons heat up in use. As long as they are smooth then I for one would say they would be fine at the size they are. If I was a production engineer and you wanted me to put a tolerance on them then I would say they should be the nominal size +000" - 0.002" or 0.05mm in metrickery. |
Involute Curve | 11/01/2014 10:02:09 |
![]() 337 forum posts 107 photos | I make my own callipers, and pistons all the time, you will be fine with this tolerance, I made a jig years ago for testing how much you could get away with in this respect, I also used this same jig to gauge the pull back effect of differing tapers on the seal seat outer face and its amazing how big a gap they will seal. Shaun |
Brian Wood | 11/01/2014 10:26:08 |
2742 forum posts 39 photos | Mark, It may add confidence to this discussion with some measurements from salvaged brake pistons from our old Landrover. These were for drum brakes, but the principle concerning lip seals still applies. The larger are 31.66-31.68 mm diameter, the smaller are 25.32-25.33 mm in diameter. There were 4 of each size. They are hardened with a chromed finish. The brake cylinders in which they operated were all aluminium alloy, it was those that corroded from the conbined effects of road salt and agricutural manure spray that found it's way into the drums. a devastating mixture. It would eat holes in a chassis in a few seasons! I hope that helps with the tolerance concerns. Brian
. |
Mark P. | 11/01/2014 16:03:36 |
![]() 634 forum posts 9 photos | Well who's a numpty then? Thanks Mick I looked in the manual after you had reminded me, never thought to look in there! Anyway the ones I have made are in tolerance (30.12mm - 30.2mm) Thanks for the replies panic over. Regards Mark P. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.