Mike Donnerstag | 12/07/2019 20:20:18 |
![]() 231 forum posts 53 photos | I have an original Myford small vice for the vertical milling slide. I wondered whether anyone else has had a problem with the fact that the base of the fixed jaw has not been machined square but instead has an arris that pushes any square-edged material out of the vice slightly when the jaws are tightened. I was hoping to use the base of the vice as a reference surface. Am I wrong to expect to be able to do this? Does anyone have an easy solution to this? Am I missing something? Many thanks, Mike |
Mick B1 | 12/07/2019 21:47:03 |
2444 forum posts 139 photos | Don't really know what you mean by 'arris', and internet definitions don't really help. My vice (which I *think* is a Myford) does seem to hold material square with in a thou or two on my double-swivel vertical slide. If it didn't, I don't really see why I shouldn't skim it square with a decent carbide endmill - it's machinable. The finish wouldn't be as perfect as I'd like, but it'd be better than an out-of-square jaw. If yours is not machinable, I'd say that's a good enough reason to spend not too much money on one that is - occasionally you might need to cut a special location. |
John Haine | 12/07/2019 21:55:26 |
5563 forum posts 322 photos | Do you mean the small radius? I think it's there to prevent a stress build up if the corner was sharp. I've got used to putting a bit of packing in under the work. |
Michael Gilligan | 12/07/2019 22:14:05 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Mick B1 on 12/07/2019 21:47:03:
Don't really know what you mean by 'arris', and internet definitions don't really help.. . The definition given by Collins is good [well at least it equates to my previous understanding], but I'm afraid it is almost exactly opposite to Mike's usage: **LINK** https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/arris I'm almost sure that Mike is referring to a small radius at the internal corner, between two faces. MichaelG. |
Michael Gilligan | 12/07/2019 22:21:07 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Mike Donnerstag on 12/07/2019 20:20:18:
Does anyone have an easy solution to this? . An easy solution might be to add a packing-piece to the fixed jaw, perhaps secured with little neodymium magnets. MichaelG. |
Berty | 13/07/2019 00:23:18 |
15 forum posts | I have heard of Arris Rail as in fencing. (A length of wood cut diagonally to form a triangular shaped end cross section). If the bottom jaw had this shape, in a much reduced form of course, then as Mike says, it would push the work out of the jaws. Berty
|
John Baguley | 13/07/2019 01:01:08 |
![]() 517 forum posts 57 photos | Hello Mike, I'm not sure without looking in the workshop but on mine I think I just machined the corner square with an endmill for the reason you state. It doesn't really get used nowadays as all my milling is done in the milling machines. John |
Andrew Moyes 1 | 13/07/2019 03:38:17 |
158 forum posts 22 photos | I've checked mine and for all practical purposes it's a square corner. Put it this way, it's never been an issue with the radius on any workpiece. Perhaps the milling cutter had become worn when yours was made. There is a 1/16" X 1/16" undercut on the moving jaw that ensures the jaws close tightly. I think you would be justified in cleaning out the corner or undercutting but the problem will be avoiding spoiling the sliding surface. Perhaps go in at a slight angle with a dovetail cutter? It would raise the stress as has been pointed out but I'd have thought there is enough in hand in the design. |
Michael Gilligan | 13/07/2019 08:11:20 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Mike, A picture of the problem area might be useful ... worth a thousand words, they say. MichaelG. |
Mike Donnerstag | 13/07/2019 10:34:17 |
![]() 231 forum posts 53 photos | Apologies to all, I had obviously misunderstood the word 'arris'. Next time I'll stop trying to be clever and use common English! The photo below shows the radius at the base of the fixed jaw. I have been using packing, though I have no accurate parallels, so I expect the accuracy of the setup will be compromised. Would it be a good idea to run a narrow slitting saw at 45deg into the corner to remove the radiused section? Using a radius gauge, I found that the radius at base of the jaw is about 1/16". I'm surprised that Myford did not machine this truly square, or is this a common occurrence on machine vices?
|
Journeyman | 13/07/2019 10:48:06 |
![]() 1257 forum posts 264 photos | The small radius in the corner is probably for stress relief, I would call it a fillet! You could fix a secondary jaw in place if you can drill a couple of holes through the fixed jaw (or even glue it) permanent packing. Many vices have replaceable jaws, you could even make a set with horizontal and vertical grooves for holding round stock. John |
Grindstone Cowboy | 13/07/2019 11:05:41 |
1160 forum posts 73 photos | I guess that's an internal arris I'd go with the slitting saw idea, I can't imagine there would be a problem with stress unless you're really overtightening the vice. If it's a worry then wouldn't a very small round nosed cutter (at 45 degrees) make a nicely rounded clearance cut? |
Mike Donnerstag | 13/07/2019 12:11:45 |
![]() 231 forum posts 53 photos | I like the idea of the round nosed cutter, which I assume would 'spread out' any stresses in the corner. I also like the idea of the replaceable jaws, though it would reduce the capacity of the vice. Does anyone have any photos of their own modified Myford vice? Or perhaps a better alternative vice that fits the standard-sized milling stand. I also have a Groz 3-way swivelling vice, something like this: However, the centres for the bolt holes won't fit the standard milling stand. Does anyone have any thoughts on this? Is it simply too big to be used for milling on the Myford? |
Michael Gilligan | 13/07/2019 14:36:11 |
![]() 23121 forum posts 1360 photos | Posted by Journeyman on 13/07/2019 10:48:06:
... You could fix a secondary jaw in place if you can drill a couple of holes through the fixed jaw (or even glue it) permanent packing. Many vices have replaceable jaws, you could even make a set with horizontal and vertical grooves for holding round stock. .
< all groan > MichaelG. |
Alan Vos | 13/07/2019 14:58:56 |
162 forum posts 7 photos | Posted by Mike Donnerstag on 13/07/2019 10:34:17: The photo below shows the radius at the base of the fixed jaw. As an aside, I suggest using washers with a larger outside diameter to secure the vice. The washer under the top bolt is tipped into the slot. To work properly, the washers need to bridge the slot, plus a bit. There is probably a formula. You may need to put a flat on the side of larger washers. Or drill two holes in a strip of metal. Or whatever arrangement takes your fancy. |
Mike Donnerstag | 13/07/2019 15:25:44 |
![]() 231 forum posts 53 photos | Alan Vos: You're right - I hadn't noticed that! I will find or make more appropriate washers for the vice. Many thanks. |
Mick B1 | 13/07/2019 20:18:33 |
2444 forum posts 139 photos | Seeing that radius at the base of your fixed jaw - from a firm like Myford - surprises me. I now don't think it's Myford as it has no name on it. It was clearly designed to fit Myford slides, though, from the screwhole spacing. It came in a blue plastic box - long since lost in house moves - and I bought it at the Olympia show in 2003 for about 20 quid, and it's served me well since. I thought all small milling vices were undercut like this to clear dirt and debris and ensure the location faces were definitive - to me, the radiused design looks like a bit of a rookie error. Edited By Mick B1 on 13/07/2019 20:18:50 |
Mike Donnerstag | 13/07/2019 20:29:19 |
![]() 231 forum posts 53 photos | That looks far more like what I would expect of a milling vice! Comparing the photos also serves to illustrate that I need better lighting in my workshop!! |
Martyn Duncumb | 13/07/2019 20:37:32 |
55 forum posts 3 photos | Mike, I too have a Myford vice, purchased 40+ years ago, which is the same as yours with a radius at the bottom of the fixed jaw. I always assumed they were all made like this. Have no idea why though. Martyn |
John Haine | 13/07/2019 20:54:23 |
5563 forum posts 322 photos | I assume (to repeat) it's there to avoid stress concentration. |
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Sign up to our newsletter and get a free digital issue.
You can unsubscribe at anytime. View our privacy policy at www.mortons.co.uk/privacy
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.