Parting off tool - straight or angled.

[This posting has been removed]

I use the 1.5 x 10 M42 plain with angled sides. Much stronger than the plain hss bit.

I will assume that the horizontal tool is the HSS unit and the angled tool is the carbide insert type they have listed ?

Do you mean the holders? if so the angled one saves having to grind the top of the tool, just touch up the end on a grinder. Down side is that if you advance the tool for a deep cut then that means ctr height has to be reset so pros and cons for each.

When asking questions of this sort about items available on the web it makes it much easier if links can be provided so people can see what is being asked about rather than having to guess.

[This posting has been removed]

[This posting has been removed]

[This posting has been removed]

[This posting has been removed]

Well according to the catalogue, the angled one isn't suitable for use with mini-lathes as it raises the cutting edge to high.

Other than that, flat for brass, angled for steel maybe. ????

Bill

[This posting has been removed]

Bill double check yourself from this link

Note: This tool holder is not suitable for Mini-Lathes since the 4° angle raises the tool too high for these machines. Please choose the Horizontal parting tool holder 090-070-00356 for use with Mini-Lathes.

I'm not familiar with Seig stuff, so I don't know what defines a Mini-Lathe.

Bill

Edited By peak4 on 31/01/2019 19:28:29

[This posting has been removed]

I bought a QCTP set and regretted it. The parting tool holder was angled. It never gets used now and eventually the holder will likely get butchered to accommodate some other cutter.

I always use my HSS parting tools dead horizontal, on steel, brass or whatever. No angle ground on the top of the blade either. No problems at all, parting up to 2" diameter steel on an 80-year-old hobby lathe. The do work best inverted and in a rear toolpost though. Seems to let the chips fall out without jamming up the works.

Hi Hopper,

I too always use the parting off tool mounted in the rear toolpost,but never tried parting off as shown in your picture !! I seldom use a steady but I can see how useful it could be when dealing with big dia bars.

Thanks for the post.

You're welcome. Yes, handy when dealing with bar too big to fit up the chuck or spindle hole. Also means you part off exactly how much you need for the job in hand from the end of your piece of stock. So you can even machine the job to finish where it sticks out of the steady, then part it off to final length. That way you don't end up with a box full of noggin ends that were left in the chuck after parting off the job.

Even when parting off, or knurling, shorter jobs, putting the steady between the tool and the chuck takes strain off the headstock bearings and spindle, which are  a tad undersized on the aged Drummond Flagellator and prone to shimmying about a bit if pushed.

Edited By Hopper on 01/02/2019 11:39:00

Why should the rear tool post give a better result then the standard tool post ?

Hi Brian. Long time no see.

For one thing, the chips fall out of the groove and don't jam up between the sides of the groove and the tool.

For another, more widely debated, thing, forces on the headstock bearings are downwards towards the more solid lower half of the headstock rather than the flimsier top bearing covers.

Why should the rear tool post give a better result then the standard tool post ?

When the parting too is inverted in the rear tool post, if it digs in it can "escape" into fresh air, whereas a front mounted tool will get dragged into (and under) the workpiece and probably break was the reason I recall being given.

Isn't the idea with the angled holder to give easier sharpening of the tool blank ? The top rake is provided by the tool holder, so only the front face of the tool blank requires grinding. On a "flat" holder, top rake as to be ground in, which can lead to more wastage on the tool blank when regrinding is required.

Nigel B